Wednesday, 8 September 2010
Raymond Hewlett was a convicted paedophile who had been imprisoned for some of his crimes, amongst those crimes against children was "drugging" and "subduing" with the use of chemicals.
There is "thought" that Madeleine may have been drugged or "subdued" in some way just prior to her abduction.
Hewlett was known to have been in the vicinity when Madeleine was abducted, yet solely because of the incompetence (or maybe even worse) of the Portuguese police coordinator Goncalo Amaral who was sacked from his position and who later took "early retirement", this man who should have been arrested and thoroughly questioned, was NOT!
There have been reports that people have reported seeing Madeleine in a white van van immediately after her abduction.
Raymond Hewlett said he has never owned a white van, yet acquaintances of Hewlett have maintained that Hewlett DID have a white van hidden somewhere at the time of Madeleine's abduction.
When Hewlett and his partner Mariana and their family left Portugal for Germany, they started their journey in a white van. Tragically en-route Hewlett's small son fell out of the van while travelling through Spain, yet neither Hewlett or Mariana realised that their child had fallen from the van! Apparently not until they had travelled a few miles on did they realise he was missing, they then had to turn their van around and travel back.
It is not known whether they came upon the scene at the roadside, but Hewlett's poor little lad was tragically killed in the accident, it is so very sad, a child that was clearly disadvantaged in life and had so little, lost his life by falling from his parents van and apparently was not even missed, it makes you want to weep.
The Spanish police apparently impounded the van and apparently may still have this van in their possession.
Hewlett and Mariana's child was apparently interred in an unmarked grave and his parents were reported to want to continue with their journey very quickly, "in indecent haste" one report writes.
It is well known that this family lived a hand to mouth existence, so how could they and their five children simply carry on by rail to Germany affording the fair for two adults and five children? They would also have to feed their children and themselves on the way. How did they manage to have so much money with them to enable them to do all of this?
There were reports that Hewlett suddenly had money and did not ever seem to be short of money, this happened not long after Madeleine was abducted, why was this never investigated?
Hewlett's partner Mariana has been likened to Kate, true in one photograph I have seen she does resemble her a little, why wasn't this fully investigated? It is of absolute vital importance because of a number of reports that maintain they saw a female resembling Kate's description handing over a child, it was not Kate, because Kate's whereabouts can be accounted for at those times, so who was it? One such report comes from the father of a Portuguese police officer, who claims to have had four adults in his cab, one a woman resembling Kate McCann and another a male resembling Robert Murat. However, it has subsequently come to light that the date that the cab driver gave as the date he said the incident took place was an incorrect date, as Madeleine had NOT then gone missing. There were so many lies and spinning of this story going on at the time that it is almost impossible to get at the truth. However, for a police investigation wanting to get to truth of who took Madeleine and why, all avenues should have been investigated and must still be investigated. One of the most obvious solutions to getting at the truth, would be to try and see if the taxi driver could have perhaps accidentally mixed the dates up? Was he in the habit of logging each fare at the time he did it? If so, then this is unlikely to carry much weight, unless of course he mistook the date, it happens, but how likely this is depends very much on the personality of the cab driver himself, which is yet another reason why he should have been interviewed. However, the proclivity is there that if he did not log details at the time and only did this every few days, then there could have been room for error.
Could this person he maintains he saw have been Mariana in the act of handing the child over, or possibly moving her on? Where is this jeep with foreign number plates, was this ever traced? Could this whole incident possibly be linked with the incident reported in the Barcelona night club in some way?
Who knows? With the utter garbage that has been written about this poor child's parents it makes it virtually impossible to get to the truth, one can only hope that the McCanns private investigators have more luck!
But whatever the answers are, there 'are' answers, and they 'are' there. Someone in Praia da Luz knows what happened to Madeleine McCann and who took her and why. It is just a matter of piecing them all the pieces together, Raymond Hewlett a convicted paedophile and his name keeps popping up in relation to Madeleine's disappearance like the proverbial bad penny. Before he died, Hewlett has said he had an alibi for the night Madeleine went missing but refused to divulge it, this is not alibi, this is just avoiding telling the truth, and if he did have an alibi for that night perhaps his partner Mariana, now living in Germany, may like to tell police about it? In fact, why haven't police formally interviewed Mariana? There are strong reasons why she should be spoken to, not only did she vaguely resemble Kate at the time of Madeleine's disappearance, Mariana's own distinct features are quite masculine, she also dresses in a very masculine way (unlike Kate McCann), this woman does resemble the description of the "man" said to have carried Madeleine away that night, in fact Mariana resembles"sketchman" more than sketchman does! There is definitely a case to made for the formal questioning of Mariana.
There are 6 or 7 people that need to be formally and seriously questioned about Madeleine's abduction, one of those has died, the others are; Hewlett's partner Mariana; Robert Murat and his now wife Michaela; Sergy Malinka; Goncalo Amaral and Ricardo Paiva.
I write this because I am trying to be as honest as I can. Writing about the disappearance of a child is such an emotive issue and in this particular case, I defy any "sane" person not to have great sympathy or feel great empathy for Madeleine's parents, this is an ongoing nightmare that this unfortunate couple cannot wake up from.
I have no desire or wish to harm any other innocent person, however this is all very noble as a child has been abducted and she remains missing and her parents seem to be bashing their heads against a brick wall to try and get the authorities to act in this case. In probability the only evidence that is available and despite the Portuguese police attempts to keep it hidden but nonetheless keeps cropping up, actually points to Madeleine still being alive. All things considered, I believe it is right to name names and to keep pushing the Portuguese government and Portuguese police and the British government and the British police to investigate this case properly, because one overriding fact is, that the case of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann has NEVER been investigated properly officially and this is a travesty of justice for the little girl and her parents. The Portuguese police refuse to cooperate with anyone or any other agency concerning Madeleine's disappearance and the British police have behaved in nothing short of an apathetic way and they too, cannot escape criticisms, the Leicestershire police come across as lazy and ignorant and on several occasions have been found wanting. They have allowed the stalking of the McCanns to go unchecked on their very doorstep, when a "crew" of miscreants among them, disgraced ex-solicitor and seeker of fame and attention Tony Bennett; attention seeker and generally thick and nasty person Deborah Butler, who was outed by the Sunday Express as being a vile stalker of the McCanns and who is also a proven liar and waster of police time and resources; Grenville and Helene Green and Sharon Brady all these people took it upon themselves to write vile untruths and print them up in libellous leaflet form and actually distribute them in the McCanns home village and in the very street where they lived and the Leicestershire police actually claimed to have no knowledge of this, despite it being on the BBC national news, on several local radio stations, (their own included) local papers and the national press! So these people broke the law and got away with a vile crime. The Leicestershire police keep saying it is a Portuguese investigation but that is the whole point, the Portuguese police are NOT investigating this and the investigation has been shelved for almost 2 years, yet this is the lie that the Leicestershire police keep trotting out. Incompetent bunch of morons, this is exactly the kind of attitude they had towards a disabled mother who felt so helpless and unable to defend her disabled daughter and herself form anti-social behaviour that she took their lives - despicable behaviour by the police.
It is not the ordinary people that have forgotten how to report things they feel are not right, it is the abject failure of BOTH the British and the Portuguese police, to take those reports and investigate them properly and it is the abject failure of the Portuguese government to oversee its own police force and force them to investigate Madeleine's disappearance properly.
This case can and MUST be the subject of a complete review, both in the UK and in Portugal. The outgoing labour government and the then Home Secretary Alan Johnson, ordered the British police to carry out this review, this is now in doubt with the new coalition government, who have backtracked on everything they have promised, they are now penny pinching and it looks like the much awaited and promised review is now not going to happen and apparently no explanation has been offered to the parents of Madeleine.
While in opposition David Cameron (now the Prime Minister of Britain) met the McCanns and promised his help, it is about time he honoured those promises, or was this just another pre-election promise he had no intention of keeping? Along with a whole string of other broken pledges and promises?
Meanwhile the Portuguese government must order a full PUBLIC review of this case, they must formally question Goncalo Amaral and Ricardo Paiva. It must be discovered for certain if Robert Murat had anything to do with Madeleine's disappearance, I say this not without reason, after reading extensively into what he and others have said about him in the Portuguese police files and how he changed his alibi a couple of times and the reports about his behaviour at the time were so bizarre they are alarming. There are also reports about the "odd" actions and behaviour of his mother, there does exist a strange fact within the Murat family, where close family members do not seem to know how they are related and there is this totally bizarre phenomena where in a small sleepy fishing village on the Algarve, several striking Robert Murat lookalikes reside and Robert Murat had an affair with the wife of one of his lookalikes, not only that he actually lived under the same roof as his lover and her former husband, Luis Antonio, who also worked as a pool-man at the Mark Warner Ocean Complex at the time Madeleine disappeared. From reading the files, the Murat part of this investigation was never really carried out properly and it is still unknown if Murat and Goncalo Amaral knew each other or knew of each other prior to Madeleine's disappearance. Amaral appears to have totally ignored the amount of mystery surrounding Robert Murat.
The Madeleine investigation was never updated, it was never reviewed properly and because of the ludicrous Portuguese secrecy rules, the investigation itself and the people who were supposed to be carrying out the investigating never knew what their own objectives were, they were never fully briefed, never even given a photo of Madeleine when they were supposed to be searching for her in the early days, in fact the only people h who had the photos printed up were her parents and it was Goncalo Amaral who decided to try and use this as some strange reason that they were covering up their daughter;s disappearance, apparently Goncalo Amaral the chief inspector s coordinator of the investigation did not want to have publicity, so everyone was working in the dark - literally! Amaral was the chief cause of why this this investigation totally lost its way. Goncalo Amaral made every single mistake under the sun that there was to make, yet we are expected to believe he was this "incredible" detective with all this wonderful experience while at the same time expected to believe that it is normal that he makes every single mistake there was to make? Sorry this does not wash, all these mistakes allowed Madeleine's abductors to get clean away and this whole case is enshrined by incompetence, secrecy, lies, leaks and smears trying to pin the blame of Madeleine's disappearance on her parents - why?
I am just an ordinary person, I did not expect to find myself in this position to keep lobbying the police and the government of both countries over the disappearance of this little girl, but now that I do find myself in this position I am not going to drop this until the truth comes out and those responsible are made to pay for what they have done, and above all Madeleine is found and returned to her parents.
To Goncalo Amaral
When I take a look at this investigation and scratch the surface and see all that just isn't right, it is unconscionable that while a child is still missing and her parents and family are still suffering, that we can just pass by on the other side and do nothing, so I will never do that. While I (and others) continue to keep this case and Madeleine high profile, the perpetrators who took Madeleine and those that know what happened to her, will never, ever be safe from detection, of this I promise you. One day Goncalo Amaral, your sins will find you out!
From a report dated 1st September 2010
A paedophile suspected of being involved in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann 'confessed' to knowing what happened to the little girl on his deathbed, it has been claimed.
Raymond Hewlett wrote to his estranged son denying he played a part in the three-year-old’s abduction, but claimed he knew she had been ‘stolen to order’ by a gypsy gang.
Cancer sufferer Hewlett, who has a record of raping and abducting children, had previously claimed to have seen the missing toddler twice before she vanished in 2007.
But he vowed only to reveal where he was the night she went missing if he was paid thousands of pounds.
Kate and Gerry McCann’s private detectives refused the request.
Today his son Wayne claimed to the Sun that the letter was delivered to him by a mystery man a week after he died in April.
Wayne, who has had no contact with his father for 20 years, claimed his father insisted he had nothing to do with Madeleine’s disappearance – but that he knew who did.
He said: ‘He said a very good gipsy friend he knew in Portugal had got drunk and “let it out” that he had stolen Maddie to order as part of a gang.
‘My dad said this gang had been operating for a long time and had snatched children before for couples who couldn’t have children of their own.Private detectives working for the McCanns are said to be ‘extremely interested’ in the claims and are preparing to interview Wayne.
‘Maddie had been targeted. They took photos of children and send them to the people they were acting for. And they said Yes or No.’
Wayne, 40, says he burned the letter because it ‘unnerved’ him so much.
The Sun reported they learned of the existence of the note through another source and confirmed they had not been approached by Wayne originally.
Madeleine went missing from The Ocean Club Hotel in Praia da Luz in the Portuguese Algarve while her parents dined at a restaurant on the resort.
Hewlett was living with his family on a campsite an hour’s drive away at the time.
Monday, 23 August 2010
People Like Debbie Butler, Tony Bennett, Joana Morais and Amberslu*, Brenda Ryan, Vanessa Sluming, Grenville and Helene Green, Sharon Bradford, Sharon Lawrence, are just sub-humans, I doubt if Madeleine was found tomorrow that they would stop, the hate by now is ingrained in their mentally disturbed psyches and ignoring them does not make a scrap of difference, in fact their mental illnesses have worsened, which makes the needs for blogs and forums like this one to counteract their lies and disinformation all the more necessary.
Sunday, 11 April 2010
By Lucy Panton , 11/04/2010
BRITISH police are to launch a new probe into missing Madeleine McCann after massive failures were found in the Portuguese investigation.
Our top child protection cop Jim Gamble has completed a fresh look at the three-year-old investigation for the Home Office.
He told ministers there were huge holes in the original inquiry that need to be revisited if they want to "come close" to reaching UK standards.
It will come as a bitter pill for Portuguese investigators who have fended off criticism since Maddie disappeared in 2007
Portugese police left 'gaping' holes
But parents Kate and Gerry McCann, both 41 and both doctors, are "delighted" at the move.
Failures in the original investigation are said to be "so gaping" that British authorities feel it is their duty to look at it again.
This time police will review all the leads using technology and standards expected in a homicide or kidnap case in the UK.
Mr Gamble, head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre, found a basic failure to collate information and join up links that should have been made.
Telephone records were not properly analysed, missing early opportunities for leads.
And Kate and Gerry McCann were named as Arguidos, or formal suspects, by Portuguese police - something that the review says would not have happened if the probe had been carried out in the UK.
Mr Gamble found no evidence sufficient to make them suspects. His findings have now been formally submitted to the Home Office with recommendations to re-investigate.
The damning review has now set the Association of Chief Police Officers the difficult task of trying to decide who takes on the mammoth task. It is already predicted to be "an extremely costly" investigation that, even if done properly, will probably never be solved.
Damning: Jim Gamble
A source said: "It is something that has to be reviewed. It is only right that the McCanns are given the satisfaction that everything that could be done has been done. It now comes down to who is up to the job."
The Home Secretary Alan Johnson is expected to announce that the new probe will NOT be carried out by Leicestershire police, the McCanns' local force. The review has highlighted failures within their handling of the case and ruled them out of the review.
Instead ACPO are now asking around their top cops to see who could take on the very difficult and complex investigation.
The source added: "It will be extremely costly and sadly is unlikely to result in a positive outcome.
"As much as we would all like this to end with good news for the McCanns, the fact is there have been a lot of missed opportunities and no-one will ever be able to reclaim the time and evidence lost."
Two thousand pages of evidence released earlier claimed Portuguese detectives failed to follow up leads.
Home Secretary Alan Johnson ordered officials to examine the "feasibility" of British detectives having a fresh look at all the evidence back in March.
Kate and Gerry McCann, of Rothley, met Mr Johnson to plead for help in their search for their daughter who vanished aged three from a holiday apartment in Praia da Luz, Portugal.
Wednesday, 7 April 2010
Human Rights lawyer Dr Marcos Aragao Correia has made and lodged the appeal against the decision not to send Goncalo Amaral to trial, for the alleged torture of Leandro Silva. The appeal was sent to the court last week. Because of this appeal, the decision of the judge of not sending Amaral to trial is suspended, and this means Amaral will *STILL BE AN ARGUIDO* for that criminal procedure. Dr Marcos aragao Correia has also decided not only to work for free - as he as always done until now concerning Leonor and Leandro, but he also paid all the judicial taxes for that appeal! Making a stark contrast to Goncalo Amaral, the disgraced former detective in the Madeleine McCann case, who has been finding many ways to make an obscene amount of money off of the back of an innocent missing Madeleine and buying up luxury apartments worth 600.000 euros allegedly in another persons name and driving around in a 60.000 euro Jaguar bought out of earnings made out of that child, by tormenting her parents with lies and defamation. Hopefully, the appeal when it is heard, will not be heard by the same judge and the 2nd judge will come to a different conclusion and send Goncalo Amaral for trial, where everyone knows he should go.
A n Open Letter To Goncalo Amaral from the human rights lawyer Dr Marcos Aragao Correia:
To Mr "Beast" Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral:
Just a few words about your new, false and defaming complaint against me to the Portuguese Bar, because we know that you Mr "Beast" Gonçalo, and your "satanic" followers, use to read this website.
How can you even insinuate that you’re not a beast? Don’t you have mirrors in your luxury apartment?
For Jesus sake, don’t lie so much! We know that your horns can not be seen cause their are well hidden, but please don’t try to hide your apparent "bestiality"! It’s too much!
So, you say that you’re not a beast? Hypocrite you are!
- Perhaps The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to Madeleine, Kate and Gerry?
- Perhaos The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to Joana, Leonor and Leandro?
- Perhaps The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to Diana, Ana and José?
- Perhaps The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to all the children victims of violence, and their parents, by allegedly protecting the criminals involved on Joana and Madeleine kidnappings?
- Perhaps The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to all the good Portuguese and British citizens by incentivizing a fascist country and a fascist police based on fake criminal investigations using torture?
Is not enough?
So, do you still maintain you’re not a beast?
Of course you are, and me and my witnesses are just going to confirm that to the Bar.
And may I inform you that the appeal of Leandro to the superior Court of Évora is already done and delivered in the Court of Faro? Yes, it’s true, so don’t sing victory yet.
And by the way, even if the fascist regime continues to protect you, don’t worry: true Justice will always be done in the end! I’m not atheist neither a Satan follower! So, True Divine Justice will always win in the end! Do you want to wait to see? Maybe it will be too late then... So, here’s my advice to you: repent of all the evil you are, ask forgiveness to all these innocent children and their parents, and divulge the names of all the criminals involved in those monstrous crimes against them, and only then I’ll stop calling what you apparently are: a BEAST! A ferocious beast from the depths of Hell.
WE ARE WATCHING YOU.
So Goncalo Amaral and his wife are preparing to move into a large luxury apartment costing €600.000 euros? This apartment is situated right in front of his existing apartment and has allegedly been purchased by Amaral registered in another person's name? Who's name is that Marcos? Could it be Sofia Amaral? Or another of his family, or a friend perhaps?
I understand too that he has a special parking place to park his luxury limousine €60.000 Jaguar motor car, which he is still driving around in?
All bought and paid for by missing abducted Madeleine McCann.
Shame on Goncalo Amaral and shame on those who help him to do this. When they do things like this, perhaps they should not complain about being called a "Beast"? That is mild, they could be called a lot worse! Like a vile pimp, living off immoral earnings by cashing in on an innocent child's disappearance! And now I understand that Paypal have unfrozen the account that Joana Morais and others set up, in which to persuade people to give money to Goncalo Amaral and meantime he has just purchased in secret a €600.000 luxury apartment? And he has Joana Morais taking pensions off of pensioners by getting them to make donations to a man living this lifestyle? How dishonest and corrupt is this? And have none of them any shame?And these people have the temerity to accuse the McCanns and the fund, even though that fund is open, honest and above board and is used solely to fund the search for Madeleine?Amaral, Joana Morais and the rest are just damned vile hypocrites!When is the Portuguese government and judiciary going to do something about this man? Portugal looks to be still a fascist police state and this man Goncalo Amaral, appears to be right in the thick of it. Is the Portuguese government and judiciary scared of Amaral? Scared that he may open his mouth and start incriminating them? I can only think this may be true, or else someone would have acted to stop this allegedly corrupt man in his tracks, he is ruining the reputation of Portugal, they have to be seen to do something about this man and pretty damned quick too!
*** Goncalo Amaral Aka "The Beast" *** Purchases €600.000 luxury apartment and registers it in another's name! *** Still Driving Around in his €60.000 luxury Jaguar Motor Car *** Yet Completely without morals and scruples takes money from pensioners to fund his lifestyle *** Joana Morais - Helps with this "Fund raising" to maintain the luxury lifestyle of Goncalo Amaral ***
Sunday, 21 March 2010
: Rosie sums up murat Vs Tanner.by dcb2 » Sun Mar 21, 2010 2:42 am "Claudia79 Today at 01:03amethyst wrote:The coordinator (Amaral) still nowhere to be seen does NOT interview her or even speak to her , even though we know he speaks fairly good English.----------does he?
- If Amaral wanted to get to the truth so desperately like he maintains, why did he NEVER speak to Mr Mrs McCann?
- Why did Amaral FAIL to COORDINATE the search he was paid to COORDINATE?
- Why does Amaral blame everyone else for his shortcomings and his failures?
- And why does he ("probably") PAY people like you to come onto blogs and forums in the UK to spread these malevolent LIES?
By getting the truthful answers to these questions, we will be closer to discovering who took Madeleine McCann and why MUCH, MUCH CLOSER!
You are nothing but a LIAR Claudia, employed and paid by another LIAR.
You have been sussed!
Bye Bye time for you to disappear, (just like your "friend" Alsabella, when she was sussed.)
What did Madeleine McCann a small innocent little girl ever do to you?
What did Joana Cipriano ever do to you?
"I Clauidia" Beware The "Ides" of "May" - Karma Is Almost Upon You!'
GONCALO AMARAL DOES SPEAK FAIRLY GOOD ENGLISH "BETTER THAN MOST PEOPLE REALISE"
And that is a FACT!
Saturday, 20 March 2010
- A child is abducted from her bed.....
- The PJ coordinator decides to stay drinking with his pals rather than attend the scene of a serious crime to actually do his job and "COORDINATE" it.
- A witness who believes she may have seen something comes forward and reports what she has seen to the police.
- The coordinator (Amaral) still nowhere to be seen does NOT interview her or even speak to her , even though we know he speaks fairly good English.
- Some time later this witness is then taken to a van with blacked out windows and asked to observe Robert Murat walking along the street.
- The coordinator, "coordinating" the investigation into a missing child, is still NOT present in this van (despite giving the impression to certain newspapers that he was)
- The witness categorically states that Robert Murat was NOT the man she saw walking along with a child in his arms that night of Thursday May 3, 2007.
- The witness then repeats this testament in her witness statement (where again the coordinator who was supposed to be "coordinating" was not in fact coordinating and was NOT present.
- The said "coordinator then gets sacked from this investigation after five months of not coordinating it, (five months of NOT doing his job properly) five months during which he has not even bothered to speak to the parents of the missing child, (despite speaking fairly good English)
- The non coordinating "coordinator" gets the sack for serious professional misconduct. He then takes early retirement from his non coordinating "coordinator's" position and has a grudge against the parents of a missing child.
- The now sacked non coordinating "coordinator" decides to write a book, where he blatantly libels the other argudio in that investigation Robert Murat.
- Robert Murat seemingly ignores the Portuguese press attempts to assassinate his character of which the non coordinating "coordinator" Goncalo Amaral was responsible for the lies and leaks that appeared in the press in Portugal and were the basis for the British press reports!
- In 2008 Robert Murat successfully sues the British press for libel and defamation, while ignoring the the true source of the stories, coming from the non coordinating "coordinator" and the Portuguese press! (still with me?)
- We then hear absolutely nothing from former arguido Robert Murat until 2010.
- Murat was actually made an arguido (suspect) in Madeleine's disappearance under the instructions of (wait for it....) the non coordinating "coordinator" Goncalo Amaral himself.
- Meanwhile the non coordinating "coordinator" Goncalo Amaral has landed himself in all kinds of bother, he has been convicted of a criminal offence, perverting the course of justice, concealing a torture, convicted of perjury and just plain lying all over the place.
- Goncalo Amaral has been exposed as the main protagonist in other controversial investigations and now there appears to be some kind of link, "linking him in with Casa Pia". (Casa Pia is the Portuguese orphanage at the center of child pornography and abuse allegations embroiling many police, doctors and judiciary, politicians etc.)
- Not only the above (there is much more still to emerge) but the non coordinating "coordinator", decided to make himself an obscene amount of money off of the back of an innocent missing child, who's investigation he did not bother to "coordinate" by accusing her parents of murdering her and concealing her body and writing this all down in a book!
- This book which has now been banned and the ban upheld twice.
- These are the self same parents Goncalo Amaral, despite being the non coordinating "coordinator" NEVER bothered to meet and talk to NOT one single time, despite him (Amaral the non coordinating "coordinator") speaking fairly good English!
- However in the non coordinating "coordinator's" book, he also accuses outright one Robert Murat! Which Murat completely ignores and decides instead to accuse a witness who was only giving a statement to police, of saying that she saw him at the scene
- Bizarre? Yes it certainly is! Even more bizarre when you realise the witness has never once accused Murat, in fact she said the man she saw was NOT him!
- So now we are at this strange place of Murat after being silent for all this time, suddenly decides to register a case against a witness, who was only doing her civic duty and reporting to police what she saw, or she thought she saw!
- Murat ignores the outright accusations of Amaral the non coordinating "coordinator".
- Murat ignores all the other people that are in the official files as saying they thought him and his behaviour very odd.
- Murat ignores all the other eye witnesses who have no axe to grind when they reported as seeing him outside the apartment where the child disappeared from.
- Murat totally ignores a police sworn and signed statement of a person who maintains that he Murat, behaved oddly, by throwing things out of an upstairs window into the street below where he could have hurt or killed passers by, (including children) ignored that this witness said that Murat tried to have sex with animals, has killed animals and tried to rape his cousin.
- Murat has totally ignored reports that he has changed his alibi several times (It is all there in the official files)
Yet bizarrely Murat files an intention to sue Jane Tanner for libel, because she said she did NOT see him that night.
Now you can call me cynical if you like but look at the timing. How convenient was it that this story emerge now right in the middle of the non coordinating "coordinator's" unsuccessful attempts to have the ban on his book overturned?
Amaral non coordinating "coordinator" knew of Murat's intention, he had to as he himself said he was called as a witness!
The non coordinating "coordinator", knew of the court dates set. The non coordinating "coordinator" has a grudge against the McCanns and their friends, he blames them for him losing his coordinating position despite never actually bothering to do his job and coordinate!Odd? More than just a little odd, this is the non story that will suddenly sprout legs and do "completely" for Amaral, like no other story has yet done for him completely.
The truth about Murat and Amaral will come out when Murat is questioned over why he decided to bring this action against Jane Tanner. *Mark my words*, do you honestly think that her legal team will allow this to slip through the net?
Who put Murat up to trying to prosecute Jane Tanner for simply being a witness and telling what she thought she saw?
Why did Murat ignore all those other appalling blemishes on his character, reported by other people and decide to prosecute JT for saying she did NOT see Murat? This is one "witness interference" that Amaral is going to wish he stayed well clear of.
Remember my words
"From little acorns, mighty oaks do grow"!
Saturday, 13 March 2010
I hope they get what they deserve, I hope each of the people that wrote to the BBC website and threatened Kate McCann now realise that they have been reported to the police and of course the BBC will have also spoken to Forumotion.
I hope they now realise that their IPs will be checked and their ISPs will be contacted and informed and I hope they realise that they are all in danger of having their internet connections taken away.
They are wholly despicable vile creatures who feel so inferior that they try to make themselves feel better by attacking the parents of a missing abducted child!
Perhaps now this has happened the government will also act to stop these foul sub-humans from spreading their filth on the internet.
Their forums and blog are absolutely littered with libellous comments which defame Kate and Gerry and their family and friends, these too will now be close examined and too late to remove them, many of us have got the screenshots and so each of those members on those sites now need to be very worried because each and every one of the, is now in real danger of being prosecuted, not only for libel, but for threatening behaviour and that is Laffin Assasin, Photon, Autumn, just to name but a few.
I hope they are worried - I have it on good authority that they should be!
Thank you to Tony of Hounding of the McCanns
Just A Thought You Know
Chaos for bringing us this news.
BBC pulls forum after threats made to Kate McCannSaturday, 13 March 2010 18:52 Raiden Madeleine McCann .The BBC was forced to remove an on-line bulletin board after it was attacked and threats made against Kate McCann, the mother of missing Madeleine McCann.The Aled Jones bulletin board hosted on the BBC site was closed following a sustained attack from members who left messages of hatred and threats directed at Kate McCann this site can reveal. We spoke to a BBC insider from the technical department who confirmed the site was closed down because of "specific threats made towards the welfare of Mrs McCann by members".Madeleine was nearly four when she disappeared from a holiday apartment in the resort of Praia da Luz in May 2007 and remains missing.The insider speaking to us under the agreement of anonymity revealed that the decision was made to close down the bulletin board after it became clear that members of the site were using the site to target Kate McCann accusing her of killing her daughter Madeleine and concealing the crime along with husband Gerry McCann and the friends who were holidaying with them at the time.The attack was coordinated and carried out by members of Forumotion's Missing Madeleine site, a site that harbours extremists who are encouraged to attack and threaten Madeleine's parents in a shared belief that this will expose the truth regarding her disappearence.Brenda Ryan, the owner of the 3 Arguidos website who normally orchestrates such on-line attacks in the past was quick to condemn it saying "Do any of you realise how this could and probably will be played out in the press, Goncalo (the disgraced ex-cop who said Maddie is dead and who is being sued for libel and defamation by the McCanns) supporters force Celebrity to close his website due to continued hatred and harassment of the McCanns?"Our contact in the BBC declined to comment further due to BBC restrictions however they did confirm that the specific threats made against Kate's welfare would be dealt with by the appropriate authorities.Both Brenda Ryan and Susan Menez, owners of the 3 Arguidos and Missing Madeleine forums respectively declined to comment to us.Kate McCann will appear on the Aled Jones show on Sunday 14th March as scheduled.We will bring you further updates on this story as and when we can.
Sunday, 7 March 2010
If only a mere part of what I have read in the papers this week is true, then dear little Madeleine McCann and her distraught parents, never stood a chance against this man Goncalo Amaral aka "Gonc". For anyone reading this blog who doesn't know, Goncalo Amaral is the disgraced former Portuguese policia judiciaria coordinator, who was sacked from the Madeleine investigation after five months, for serious professional misconduct, he also lost his position as Portimao police chief and was designated a desk job. Amaral has since taken "voluntary" early retirement and now receives a hefty police pension.
If only the hour long coffee breaks and three hour long lunches taken by Amaral while he was supposed to be looking for a missing child, that we all thought were so scandalous where the only thing we had to worry about with this man, Goncalo Amaral!
Amaral currently has several criminal charges being brought against him for a variety of reasons, which range from the alleged torture of Leandro Silva, to deliberately breaking his country's strict secrecy laws. Amaral is also due to answer the charge of libel and defamation and deliberately hindering and impeding the search for missing Madeleine McCann, through a book that he has written. A book which has been banned from worldwide sale under an injunction, which Amaral has twice tried unsuccessfully to have lifted. In this book Amaral claims that Kate and Gerry McCann somehow were responsible for their daughter's death and that they for some bizarre reason, decided to hide the body, retrieve it some 25 days later, drive it around in a hire car under the gaze of the entire world's press, before magically finding yet another impenetrable hiding place, in a country the couple had only come to stay in for one week while taking a family vacation. Amaral and his now deceased friend Guilhermino Encarnacao, were the source of the leaking, the smearing and the character assassination of Kate and Gerry McCann in the Portuguese press. Goncalo Amaral also had the McCanns made arguidos (suspects) in their daughter's disappearance on DNA evidence that KNEW did NOT exist! This suggests that Amaral went to the Portuguese prosecutor and they both decided to lie and make the McCanns suspects, or that he lied to the prosecutor about the DNA evidence that never was, either is a very serious charge.
Goncalo Amaral was warned by John Lowe the head of the Birmingham FSS, that there was no conclusive evidence that Madeleine's body had ever been in the hire car BEFORE he made the McCanns arguidos, using this non evidence to do so. Add to this, that it took Amaral 5 months to come to do this and suddenly he went from keeping these parents hanging about, not informing them about the search for their daughter, having them met with a barrage of unfounded and unsubstantiated claims, a different one for every hour it seemed, updated virtually every hour, of every day in the Portuguese press and world's media and on newspaper websites accusing them of all kinds of heinous things, to having them told by Ricardo Paiva that they were due to be formally questioned by the PJ and having them wait for weeks knowing this. The McCanns not only distraught and traumatised over the abduction of their missing daughter, and not knowing where she was, or what was happening to her, and realising that the Portuguese police who were supposed to be searching for their daughter, had NOT been since day 3 of the investigation, so coming to terms with the fact that no one was searching for Madeleine, also had to endure this psychological torture, on a drip, drip effect each minute of each and every day for five months, at the hands of Goncalo Amaral and Guilhermino Encarnacao, through unsubstantiated leaks to the Portuguese press. Any lesser people would have got the hell out of Portugal, but no, the McCanns stayed and they stayed because they wanted to help the search for their daughter and they were willing to "take anything thrown at them" and to go through anything in order to help get their daughter back, so for weeks lived with this terrible psychological battering and waited to be questioned and then suddenly the questioning came, almost in indecent haste it came and four months down the line, they still had NOT met with Goncalo Amaral, the person charged with finding their daughter and to this day have never once met or spoken with him.
Gerry McCann was told they had evidence that his wife had harmed Madeleine and that he should confess, when Mr McCann asked to see the evidence he was refused, when Mr McCann asked what the evidence was he was not told, instead the officers waved a piece of paper in his face and screamed that they had the evidence here in their hands. Mr McCann said they could not have the evidence because he knew they were both innocent. The "evidence" being waved about on a piece of paper so threateningly in front of Mr McCann's face, turned out to be the NON evidence of the dogs, which had already been ruled as inconclusive and the DNA sample taken from the hire car hired 25 days AFTER Madeleine disappeared and the sample gathered from the car, some THREE months AFTER her disappearance when tested was found inconclusive and could have belonged to anyone of the McCann family, and in fact could have belonged to any one of a percentage of the population, including the person who carried out the tests on the sample in Birmingham, England.
Kate McCann was questioned by a detective that had previously been the family's liaison officer, one Ricardo Paiva. Paiva had previously assured Kate McCann that the PJ believed Madeleine was abducted and that the couple had nothing to do with her disappearance. It was Ricardo Paiva that broke the news prior to the formal questioning of the McCanns, that they were more than likely going to be made arguidos, it was Ricardo Paiva that witnessed the complete emotional breakdown of Kate McCann as this terrible news and what it meant to the search for their daughter began to sink in. It was Ricardo Paiva that at that time reassured Kate that he believed them and it was Ricardo Paiva that could not look Kate in the eye, when they attended for formal questioning, prior to being made arguidos. It was Ricardo Paiva that tried to plea bargain with Kate McCann, telling her that if she confessed, that she would serve two years in prison and that her husband would even be allowed to keep his job. It was Ricardo Paiva that put it about that Kate had refused to answer 48 questions. It was Ricardo Paiva and Goncalo Amaral that compiled those questions, questions that were specifically designed, if answered by Kate McCann to entrap her with the guilt for the disappearance of her daughter, this was why her Portuguese lawyer advised her not to answer those questions. If you read over those questions, some of them Kate McCann could not possibly have known the answer to. No 18 for instance: How were the authorities contacted and which police force was alerted? Apart from asking how the police were first contacted, how on earth was Kate McCann expected to know which police force was alerted? How would she know that the Portuguese police had at least 3 structures to their police, the PJ, the GNR and the PSP? The woman had never been to Portugal before and had only been on holiday in the country for a few days, what a completely stupid question, one designed so that she could NOT answer it. Number 22. Did you call Sky News? By this time the PJ knew very well that the McCanns did NOT call Sky News, Sky News had told them directly that they had NOT done this, so why ask this question? 26. Is it true that during the searches you remained seated on Maddie’s bed without moving? If Goncalo Amaral had bothered to attend the scene of this major crime unfolding on HIS patch, INSTEAD of electing to stay drinking with his friends and eating shrimp, he would have known the answer to this question. In fact this was completely untrue and so to was the lie stated in Amaral's book about the McCanns praying on the floor of Madeleine's room. But I would suggest that even if they did remain seated and unmoving on Madeleine's bed, why would this be deemed as wrong? To me it would suggest that they were deeply traumatised and needed help and pretty quickly!
So after this the McCanns were made arguidos as explained on NO evidence at all, had Goncalo Amaral waited a further 8 days, instead of wasting weeks and months and then in the end rushing to make them arguidos, had he waited, he would have been UNABLE to make the McCanns arguidos, because the law changed in Portugal and he would have had to supply evidence to make them suspects, evidence Amaral did NOT have! Having done this, Amaral then sought to blacken the McCanns characters still further, by accusing them of running back to the UK after being made arguidos. 1) Amaral NEGLECTING to say that they had delayed returning home because they knew they were to be formally questioned by the PJ and had been kept waiting for the questioning for several weeks. 2) Under the terms of their arguido, they were told they would be legally required to report back to Portugal if and when required to do so. If they failed to comply with this then they could be arrested by the UK police. 3) Kate was threatened during her questioning that if they stayed in Portugal, the Portuguese authorities may take the twins away from them and may place them in the Portuguese care system. (A care system that has the sex scandal of Casa Pia childrens home to its name, which is now lumbering its way through the Portuguese courts, maning government officials, local government officials, celebrities, doctors, the judicary and the judicial police too! Knowing this, why wouldn't the McCanns want to get their children out of that country and home to safety? They had already had lost one child to abduction and were being accused of murdering her, while the real criminals, the abductors were being allowed by Amaral to get away scot free!)
Now during one of Amaral's many court cases/trial his appeal to have the ban on his libellous book lifted, he presented as a witness for himself, no other than the currently serving PJ inspector, Ricardo Paiva! The same Ricardo Paiva that had stabbed Kate McCann in the back and blatantly lied to her! The same ricardo Paiva that was instrumental in Kate being made a suspect in her own daughter's disappearance and the same Ricardo Paiva that had promised Kate and Gerry McCann that the PJ were doing everything they could to find Madeleine, when in fact they were doing absolutely nothing but trying to find ways to pin the child's disappearance on them, the search that in all but name had ceased on DAY 3 after poor Madeleine disappeared.
Chief Inspector and coordinator Paulo Rebelo who had taken over when Amaral was sacked from the investgation had presented evidence to Portugal's atorney general and two prosecutors who had deemed that the case was to be shelved and that there was no evidence to say that the parents had harmed their child in any way, shape or form and had cleared the McCanns and removed their arguido status. It was also said that there was NO evidence to suggest that Madeleine had died, or was alive. Rebelo then handed the shelved investigation over to "Ricardo Paiva" who was suposed to oversee any information coming into the investigation and ask for the case to be re-opened if any new information became available.
Ricardo Paiva believes that Madeleine is dead. Ricardo Paiva is a very close friend of Goncalo Amaral, so close that he attends private functions at Amaral's home and he also attended Amaral's lavish 50th birthday party, complete with non stop flowing champagne and expensive fireworks and the finest food and cigars and wine, a birthday party where Amaral's wife lavished a several carat £10.000 studded diamond earring for her 50 year old husband's newly pierced ear! A birthday party where Ricardo Paiva was alleged to be among the "thugs" alleged to have been sent by Amaral, to harrass and threaten his former lover and her husband as they stood smoking a cigarette in the street watching the fireworks. Ricardo Paiva alleged to be among those that stood and watched while the couples lawyer was attacked and pulled through the open window of his car and where the husband of the Amaral's former lover was slapped and punched and physically abused. Where this couple have been threatened in their own home by Amaral, recorded on tape and can be listened to and the transcript available to read on this blog.
This is on and the same Ricardo Paiva that is supposed to be able to put all personal feelings to one side and be able to judge candidly whether any new information has come into the "sheleved" investigation, enough to take to Portuguese attorney general and request that the investigation be re-opened. Yet this man Chief Inspector Ricardo Paiva a close friend of sacked and now widely discredited Goncalo Amaral, appeared in court as a witness FOR Goncalo Amaral during his appeal hearing and while under cross examination from the McCanns libel lawyer, Dra Isabel Duarte he calmly proclaims under oath;
1) That he believe that Madeleine McCann was dead.
2) That when he was working on the Madeleine McCann case under his then boss Goncalo Amaral, that they had NO time to investigate any other theories, other than the parents were responsible for their daughter's disappearance, which of course meant that any information and sightings and clues to the girls whereabouts were NOT investigated.
3) That of course his former boss was not responsible for hindering the search for Madeleine as there was planety of information still coming into the investigation.
Lawyer Isabel Duarte then asks Ricardo Paiva who is still under oath, how can he possibly look for a live child, that he believes to be dead?
Paiva was then asked if all of this information was still coming into the investigation then what has happened to all of this information?
Paiva under oath was forced to answer, that he had been placing all the information that came into this investigation in a file.
On learning this, Isabel Duarte went to the PJ facility where this file was held and under the freedom of information act asked to view this "file". Imagine her shock and horror and later the McCanns shock and horror and disbelief to find that this "file" was several thousand pages big and it contained information deemed highly credible sent in by the McCanns private investigators and Leicestershire police, but was just shoved into this file and NOT actioned upon! Not only this, there are pages and pages of sightings containing children who bore more than a passing resemblance to Madeleine UNACTIONED. Then there are the 1000's pages of information that has come from people who have contacted the investgation believing they may hold vital information as to Madeleine's location. Most of the thousands of pages of information in this dossier, have NOT been investigated, people being spoken to who all sya they gave their information and expected to be contacted by the investgation team but had heard nothing further, it is shocking and it must be absolutely soul destroying for Madeleine and her parents, so imagine how they felt when they discovered that Ricardo Paiva had taken all of this information, placed it in his "file" most of it remaining uninvestigated and then marking the filr "NOT RELEVANT TO THE INVESTIGATION"! How would Ricardo Paiva know this if he had not looked at it, let alone investigated it? How would he know what was relevant and what wasn't if he had not looked at it?
How could Ricardo Paiva come to an unbiased decision if he believed that Madeleine was dead and that his friend Goncalo Amaral was right when on no evidence he had accused the child's father? How could Ricardo Paiva a currently serving police inspector, be deemed as unbiased when he has been in court backing up his best friend disgraced and sacked former PJ coordinator Goncalo Amaral's right to write libellous comments in his book? How can Ricardo Paiva be unbiased when he backs up his fried Goncalo Amaral's right to make an obscene amount of money off of the back of an innocent missing child that he had failed, by accusing her parents of killing her and hiding her body?
Paiva could not answer how he could use his judgement and come to the decision that the case should remain closed, if the information was not being investgated, if he Ricardo Paiva had not even been looking at the information coming in, let alone investigating it?
Image borrowed from Hounding of the McCanns, thank you Tony.
The revelations that have emerged this week have been nothing short of astonishing that individuals within a police force have apparently been given carte blanche to behave in any way they saw fit and seemingly not to care what happened to a small child who was abducted from Prai da Luz, Portugal May 3, 2007.
Officers have been allowed to get away with behaviour that could be easily be termed as a gross deriliction of duty and negligence in the extreme.
Former officers have been allowed to swan about Portugal, getting paid for writing books and selling the rights of the book to TV companies to make documentaries heavily slanted and biased which are based on the book written by Amaral, which accused the McCanns of killing thier daughter and hiding her body. Amaral has been allowed to spread his malevolent lies around the TV and radio studios of Portugal and Europe and in various newspapers, all the while cashing in on Madeleine's name. Amaral even tried to sell an interview with himself to Sky News for £80.000, fortunately Sky told Amaral they were not interested! But Portugal had been allowing this man to do this and get away with it, until Amaral started harming the search for little Madeleine so much and excrably harming the reputation of her parents so much so, that in the end the McCanns had no option but to use the courts to have him stopped. Remember these are people that have never been charged of any wrongdoing about anything in their entire lives, yet were being forced to suffer inexplicably like this at the hands of Goncalo Amaral, the man who blundered his way through the investigation. In fact amaral made every single mistake there was to make, so much so, that people have questioned that these mistakes were not accidental, but deliberate, in order to deliberately frustrate and impede the inquiry into Madeleine McCann's abduction!
Make you own mind up about this astonishing sequence of events, but also remember this below, it concerns the alleged torture of yet another person claiming that Goncalo Amaral is a violent thug and remember that Goncalo Amaral is already a proven liar and perjurer, what else could he be?
Leandro Silva alleges that Goncalo Amaral beat him so badly that he received injuries serious enough to warrant his admission to hospital for four days and then forced him to take one month off of his work to recover.
In May 2009, Goncalo Amaral was found guilty for his part in the proven torture of Mr Silva's partner, Leonor Cipriano. Perjury, lying and concealing evidence of a torture were among Amaral's convictions and his suspended prison sentence is currently under appeal. Mrs Cipriano was found guilty of the murder of her daughter Joana, who remains missing to this day. The case made legal history in Portugal, being the only murder trial to be held in the absence of a body. This was why a confession from the mother was vital, without her confession there could not have been a trial. It was later proven that Leonor Cipriano was indeed tortured into confessing to the murder, a confession made in the absence of her lawyer and a confession she has since retracted and has never repeated. There lies the first anomaly, under Portuguese law, her confession should have confirmed by her in court at her trial and it never was.
Many in Portugal, including top lawyers, judges and prosecutors maintain that her guilt was never proved beyond reasonable doubt and that the evidence used to convict Leonor Cipriano was at best vaguely circumstantial and at worse completely unsafe, in fact, one of the judges that presided over her trial insisted on going down on record as believing that Leonor is innocent and that she has been wrongly convicted. Since her conviction her sentence was reduced from 20 years to 16 years under appeal and her alleged torture under Goncalo Amaral and his men has been proven, this is nay other modern European country would be enough to see Leonor walk free from prison, her conviction ruled unsafe, or at the very least a retrial ordered, but her appeal against her conviction and subsequent sentence has been astonishingly been turned down, under the guise that no new evidence has come to light to warrant this. Apparently, in Portugal, the discovery of the fact that Leonor Cipriano was taken from her prison cell during the night, to the PJ facility, where a plastic bag was placed over her head and then she was forced to kneel on ashtrays and then beaten with a cardboard tube, punched and kicked and tortured for over 24 hours, while being forced to soil herself because she was not allowed to go to the bathroom, or have a drink of water and then while in a completely disorientated state of mind delerious with pain and dehydration with a build up of toxins in her blood, terrified and in terrible pain, was forced into confessing to murdering her own child, cutting the body up and feeding it to the pigs, (without a trace of evidence being found anywhere) is NOT deemed as new evidence, or reason to rule a mistrial or unsafe conviction! I would like to know what was behind this judge's decision and if this judge was indeed, one of the "many judge friends" that Goncalo Amaral announced to the world that he had, just a short time ago!
Ask yourselves if you have ever seen so much concerning one man and his "friends" in any other case/cases, in any other country in the world? Have you ever seen such events anywhere, where a man like this has been left free to go about his business? Ask yourself also and in all honesty, would you trust Goncalo Amaral. while you are asking yourselves, think of these photographs of the bruised and battered face and body of tortured and wrongly convicted Leonor Cipriano, yet another Goncalo Amaral "controversy"!
Why aren't the Portuguese police investigating Amaral who has even given false accounts in order to claim legal aid, where he omitted to state he owned a large house, in large grounds with a swimming pool amongst his assets?
Why are they not investigating Goncalo Amaral a former policeman and head of the drug squad where he was involved in yet another controversy? The case of Hugo, where the man was falsely accused and despite being able to provide many witnesses that testified he was in his wife's home town at a family function, Amaral made him go to court where the man was sent for trial in neighbouring Spain, and Hugo became so scared and so distraught that he attempted suicide while in jail, fortunately the Spanish judge dismissed all charges against him and gave him an unconditional discharge the victim of mistaken identity, his victim even said that he did not know of, or recognise Hugo. Yet Amaral forced this man to stand trial in Portugal and astonishingly he was sent to Spain for the Spanish to sort out. It later emerged that it suited amaral to have Hugo charged, because this helped to PROTECT drug traffickers, yet again Amaral was allowed to get away with what appears to be illegal activities.
To this day Goncalo Amaral is still free and still be allowed to swan about his country accusing innocent people of heinous crimes.
When are the Portuguese going to do something about him? It is extraordinary that this man has gone unchallenged up to now!
Amaral has even got a person by the name of Joana Morais acting as fund raiser for him, she surfs the net asking for donations into what she calls Amaral's defence fund. Meanwhile while she is taking money from pensioners who can least afford it, her hero Goncalo Amaral, is running around Portimao in a £60.000 luxry Jaguar motor car, paid for out of the money earned for hum by innocent missing Madeleine McCann! Paypal has recently suspended all donations into this account pending investigations into its alleged legality. In any case, amaral has plenty if money for his own defence without taking the money from pensioners, he could sell his Jaguar luxury limo for a start!
Now the British home secretary Alan Johnson is said to be trying to persuade Portugal to reopen the Madeleine McCann investigation and is also said to be trying to carry out a review of the case here in Britain.
If nothing is done about Amaral and this madness he has created, a major diplomatic incident is going to occur and yet despite this late time, the Portuguese government could still salavge some fo their reputation by taking some very simple steps and actions.
1) Arrest Amaral 2) make him a witness (under Portuguese law he will be forced to answer questions) 3) Ensure that Amaral is charged and held to account for his other misdemeanors. 3) Conduct a full review of the Madeleine McCann investigation 4) Re-open the Madeleine investigation 5) Hold a full open and independant inquiry into the whole business 6) On NO account let inspector Ricardo Paiva anywhere near the Madeleine investigation 7) Suspend Paiva from duty pending a full investigation into his conduct.
Having done this, the rest of the world would then see Portugal behaving like any other modern country and the damage done by Goncalo Amaral and lowlives who abducted Madeleine McCann, would then start to be repaired.
It is the only way, there is simply no other way open to Portugal at this late stage. Inaction and dithering, secrecy and denial has led Portugal to this point, to lead her out of it will take humility, respect for the law, transparency and accountability and Portugal can do this, in my opinion she simply has no other choice!
In any case whatever happens, Goncalo Amaral is "Going, Going, Gonc"!
Monday, 15 February 2010
You will find no dirt here, I do not take or make payment to anyone, my conscience is clear, how about yours?
I would never coerce a pensioner into giving up her small pension in order to fund a corrupt policeman's legal case, in his wish to write a book he had no business writing and to enable him to carry on living a lifestyle he clearly cannot afford without the input of money earned off of the back of a child he failed to find and who he failed on every single level.
Why should you ask for money from people who cannot afford it, to enable Goncalo to swan aound in his £40.000 Jaguar motor car? You have a strange idea of democracy Joana, democracy does not come with one "Carnation" revolution, democracy is more than turning up at a court house to shout at broken people and rudely thrust flowers in their faces in the hope of causing them still more pain and hurt, democracy is a long and hard fight, that we should never give up, but what you call democracy, and the type of democracy that you and your fat friend want, is NOT democracy, in fact it is the opposite and the enemy of democracy and free speech. Democracy and free speech is freedom to speak, freedom to write, freedom to criticise governments, freedom to speak as you find, but only freedom to speak and write the TRUTH, freedom of speech is NOT freedom to libel, persecute and vilify and write books presenting a "thesis" as the truth, when it is nothing but lies, born out of the most damaging duplicitous behaviour, purposefully thought up to avenge oneself, because oneself feels anger at losing his job! Or using the excuse of a threat to free speech and democracy as a way to get at people and falsely make them worry in order to carry on making money and covering ones own lies and ones own wrongdoings and tracks with still more lies. That Joana is the arc enemy of any democracy and free speech. What you and Goncalo Amaral are defending and fighting for the right for, is actually fascist (and look over my posts I NEVER not ever use the word fascist lightly) How Goncalo silenced the McCanns while peddling his lies is how history shows us people like Hitler controlled people, he brow beat them, brainwashed them and tortured and killed people and ruled them by fear, so please do not bandy the word fascist around like confetti, the way I have seen you doing on your blog, I take that as a grave insult and a total injustice to those who have truly suffered at the hands of a fascist dictator, very much like your own country. If you use the word fascist just to make your writings look powerful then you water down the meaning of that terrible, terrible word and when that word is watered down, which word steps up to take the place in order that we described the true enemy of democracy and free speech?
The McCanns are not the enemy of free speech, all they seek to do is to be allowed to search for their daughter in peace, without being falsely accused by a corrupt convicted ex policeman, is this really too much to ask?
Be careful Joana of the things you accuse others of, history has taught us some very harsh lessons in the past and will no doubt do again in the future.Both you and your "friend" Goncalo wrote things and when nothing happened to stop you, you both became bolder and bolder and you both wrote the most terrible things because you both thought you could get away with it. You both are guilty of serious crimes against democracy and free speech, you used lies, innuendos and half truths to fool people, to present things in such a way that they look true, when in fact they were nothing but the vicious meanderings of a slighted man and you who saw fit to back him. You are in some ways worse than your friend Goncalo Joana, because you know deep down in your soul that you are wrong, yet stubbornness, false pride and jingoism spurred you on. Be honest with yourself for the first time in 3 years Joana and admit that Madeleine has long gone from your arguments, that you barely even give her a thought these days, the reason why you are here in such a malevolent fashion is because you dislike intensely the McCanns, simply because you see them as bringing shame upon your country So you will back anyone and anything that personally attacks that couple and you ought to feel a deep sense of shame for that and for things that you have written about them, all the more because you know inside that the things you have allowed to be published on your blog are simply not true and are the result of hysterical spiteful minds, your own included.Goncalo Amaral knows what he has done, he knows how he has fooled his country-folk into believing events that are simply untrue, he has a different agenda to you Joana, yet you aid and abet him, when it all comes tumbling down like a pack of cards, where does that leave you and the rest of the vile spiteful people like you? Standing around outside draughty courthouses with a bunch of wilting "Red Carnations"?
Wednesday, 13 January 2010
Tuesday 12th January 2010 The Start Of The McCanns Legal Action Against Disgraced Former Portuguese Detective Goncalo Amaral
A BBC East Midlands Today Reporter Asks :.. "Mr Amaral are you hurting the McCanns"?
This is the caliber of person that the misfortunate parents of missing Madeleine McCann had to organise the search for their daughter. Amaral showed himself in his true colours yesterday.
Yesterday morning Amaral started off the day showing his arrogance and contempt for the judge, contempt for the McCanns and contempt for the entire court by arriving late for proceedings on the very first day.
Yesterday afternoon Amaral showed more arrogance and more contempt for court and the judge by arriving 30 minutes late back from lunch. (Remember Amaral is quite partial to late liquid lunches!)
Yesterday afternoon Amaral demonstrated yet further contempt for the judge and for court, by falling asleep during court proceedings.
Things did not go well for Amaral, his witnesses failed to perform and far from going any way to proving his case, they actually disproved it further.
With this in mind, when court was adjourned for the day Amaral left the court and immediately using foul language verbally assaulted Mr Mrs McCann. "F*ck the McCanns" he said when asked a simple polite question. If it wasn't bad enough that many of Amaral's lies were exposed and ridiculed in court yesterday by his own witnesses, he emerged from court and very unprofessionally used foul language directed towards the parents of a missing girl, but he did this in English and Mr Amaral, has made much of the fact that he could not speak to Mr Mrs McCann when their daughter disappeared because he did not speak English! Well he had no trouble understand the rapidly speaking reporter and Amaral certainly had no difficulty understand English and returning that foul retort! Proving that once again Goncalo Amaral has been misleading the public and lying to them, of course he can speak English, we have always known he could, nice of him to prove this at last!
What about Madeleine McCann's right to free speech? What about Madeleine McCanns human rights? What about Madeleine McCann's right to be searched for? What about the McCanns right to expect a detective to do his job properly? What about the McCanns rights to not have salacious lies spread about them by a police officer who was failing on every count?
Mr Amaral has been whingeing and whining about his rights to "freedom of Speech", in fact everything in Mr Amaral's life is about him and how hard up he is and how hard done by he is.
Indeed everything that has gone wrong in Amaral's life is always the fault of someone else! Amaral never takes any responsibility for anything. It was the McCanns fault their child was abducted. It was the McCanns fault that he (Amaral) failed to do his job properly; It was the McCanns fault that he insulted the British police and got himself the sack; It was the McCanns fault that their salary is higher than his! It was the McCanns fault that he was passed over for promotion; It was the McCanns fault that he had to work; It was the McCanns fault they lived in a big house; It was the British media's fault; It was the British government's fault; It was Alipio Rbeiro's fault; It was Sofia's (Amaral's wife) fault that he (Amaral) had several affairs; It was Sofia's fault that he drove his police car while drunk with his own little girl in it; It was Sofia's fault that he threatened to hit her; It was Sofia's fault that he threatened to strangle her; It was Sofia's fault that he threatened her with death; It was Sofia's fault that one Christmas she was so scared for her daughter's welfare that she ran into a police station and reported her husband violence; It was DR Aragao's fault that he (Amaral) sent thugs out to assault him and pull him out of his car window; It was Mr Mrs Bras fault that he (Amaral) sen thugs out to beat and punch Mr Bras in his face; It was Dr Aragao and the couple's fault that they had to flee to the Public Security Police for protection; It was Dr Aragao and the Bras couple's fault that they had to make official complaints about Amaral; It was Mrs Ana Bras' fault that she felt the need to write to the attorney general, not once but TWICE pleading for him to help protect them from Amaral; It was someone else's fault that Amaral became a corrupt convicted criminal; It was someone else's fault that Amaral got himself into over half a million euros in debt; It was Leonor Cipriano's fault that Amaral allowed her to be tortured while in police custody; It was Leonor Cipriano's fault that she was forced to confess to murdering her own child by means of torture etc (it goes on and on and on)
Yes I suppose it is also someone else's fault that Amaral in his latest trouble (that someone else made for him of course) has so far produced a string of lacklustre witnesses that were somehow supposed to prove that what he had written in his book was the truth and therefor, he was allowed to write it and therefor, had not defamed Kate and Gerry McCann and had not committed libel.
It was definitely the prosecutor's fault that when pressed by Judge Rodrigues about if he thought Madeleine McCann was dead, the prosecutor replied "50 - 50" in other words he did not know, in other words what Amaral has written in his book is NOT true and cannot be proved to be true, so therefor saying that Madeleine had died in apartment 5a and that her parents concealed her body (for some bizarre reason) is definitely UNTRUE, do therefor when publishing this knowingly in a book and then travelling around the world saying this, Amaral is committing libel and he is defaming and harming the McCanns character and reputations.
It was Ricardo Paiva's fault when he said under oath that because of Amaral's thesis, there was no time to investigate other possibilities for Madeleine's disappearance. In other words Amaral was so obsessed in proving the McCanns harmed their daughter and concealed her body, there was no time left to actually search for the child!
Just before court was adjourned for lunch today, Moita Flores dropped his "mate" Amaral firmly in it, by calmly quoting that Amaral's book was only a hypothesis, it was NOT the absolute truth"! Nice one Mr Flores, glad we finally agree on something, if you can see that his book is not the absolute truth, then you can surely see that he should not be making such statements as: "Madeleine died in apartment 5a earlier and the parents hid her body" that is a libellous remark and this is what the McCanns want stopped, they want people like Amaral to stop telling lies about them. They gave him every opportunity to stop, he didn't so they had to have him stopped, I suppose this is their fault too Mr Amaral?
Moita Flores who testified for Amaral in court today aided a paedophile in getting off of his crimes and sick assaults on children! When he was a PJ detective he along with another PJ detective Dias Andre' saw the case of someone which held a large quantity of paedophilia, then suddenly they both testified and said that it just contained a speech! Both men retired early from the PJ with considerable wealth, people do not understand how Dias Andre' had so much money in order to sustain his lavish lifestyle!
Of course some people pretend to be in debt, to divert attention away from their wrongdoing, very clever. Some people have put all their money and property into the name of his relatives and wife.
The case Continues Today!