Still Missing ~ Still Missed ~ Still searching.
Anyone who thinks they have any information please see contact details below. The Portuguese police cordinater Goncalo Amaral, has repeatedly frustrated the search for Madeleine. Mr Amaral has already been found guilty of concealing evidence of torture in the case of another missing child, is also facing a raft of other charges, he is due to appear in court for libel and defamation of Madeleine's parents, Drs Kate & Gerry McCann.
I would like to unreservedly apologise to vivanora for my shockingly poor spelling. I realise that in the midst of her and her fellow paedo supporters attempts to lynch two innocent people she must have far more important things to do than spellcheck each and every one of my posts. I will attempt to use the spellcheck facility on my computer before I post from now on, so as to allow vivanora more time to spend doing what is most important to her, pitchforking. I also sincerely hope that one day soon she finds her life, the one she lost many years ago, and that in doing so she can be rehabilitaed into decent society, and become a useful and worthwhile member of her local community.
Quote ___________________________________ Stella by Starlight Post subject: Re: SKY NEWS GERRY McCann (LIVE)Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:48 pm
Mafia Boss
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 3:33 pm Posts: 3975 The guy coughing in the background, especially when he said there is no evidence she is dead, had me in stitches.... Who is he? ___________________________________
Unquote
Apparently the diseased minds think it is funny and amusing that they think Madeleine is dead!
Is it any wonder they think that Madeleine's abduction a 'joy' to discuss.
Tell us Bennett, did you all group you chairs together to make it look like there were many more people there?
Regarding the Meeting That Bennett Said Went So Well...
I wonder, what the supposed two German attendees thought of the discussion on UKIP? And who were these German attendees? Neo Natzis perhaps?
Quote: __________________________________ AntiCS Post subject: Re: INVITATION TO A MEETING ON SAT 1 AUGUST TO DISCUSS MADELEINEPosted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:21 am On Parole
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:05 pm Posts: 1090 Location: In Hope .... of justice for Madeleine
To those people whose "wider agenda" at the meeting had more to do with UKIP politics than with justice for Maddie - shame on you. My aversion to the UKIP surpasses my contempt of the McCanns. __________________________________ UNQUOTE
Post subject: Re: Police investigating malicious pro-McCann forums & blogs New postPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 6:13 pm Mafia Boss
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 11:58 pm Posts: 3278 TM I regret to say, you are like a stuck gramaphone record. How TB decides to pursue people who have abused him is a matter for him regardless of what you repeatedly harp on about with your very limited knowledge of the law. If you had any comprehension for one thing you would understand that Tony would need to pay a lawyer to take a civil action against people who he is not even clear who they are. He could and undoubtedly would incur a huge costs bill that would get him nowhere. Asking the police to investigate them and deal with them if possible is the simple and obvious route to seek redress.
What is obvious is that they wished to argue that the statement was the truth but the Appeal Court would not allow the defence.
It may be obvious to you, but it is not to a rational person. You have not read the article and you have not read the Appeal Court judgment, neither have you studied and worked in criminal justice as I have. Many people who lack education and insight, perceive things are "just obvious", that demonstrates a mind that just does not want to bother to even inquire, tunnel vision. I can understand why people take the attitude against you that they do.
There is a difference between disagreeing with Mr Bennett and just conducting an endless slanging match with little knowledge to even back up what you say. You do yourself no credit, including by repeatedly harping on about a subject that Tony and I are trained in. You, quite obviously, are not!
Poor,poor viv, such a confused mind! We all remember when you said you were NOT a solicitor, after claiming you were!
8 comments:
With any luck, the ship will go down quickly, sucking those 'rats' down with it.
I would like to unreservedly apologise to vivanora for my shockingly poor spelling. I realise that in the midst of her and her fellow paedo supporters attempts to lynch two innocent people she must have far more important things to do than spellcheck each and every one of my posts. I will attempt to use the spellcheck facility on my computer before I post from now on, so as to allow vivanora more time to spend doing what is most important to her, pitchforking. I also sincerely hope that one day soon she finds her life, the one she lost many years ago, and that in doing so she can be rehabilitaed into decent society, and become a useful and worthwhile member of her local community.
Quote
___________________________________
Stella by Starlight Post subject: Re: SKY NEWS GERRY McCann (LIVE)Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:48 pm
Mafia Boss
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 3:33 pm
Posts: 3975 The guy coughing in the background, especially when he said there is no evidence she is dead, had me in stitches.... Who is he?
___________________________________
Unquote
Apparently the diseased minds think it is funny and amusing that they think Madeleine is dead!
Is it any wonder they think that Madeleine's abduction a 'joy' to discuss.
Tell us Bennett, did you all group you chairs together to make it look like there were many more people there?
Aw, Vile, read on your blog that you've been banging your head. Now, it explains the brain damage you obviously suffer from.
Regarding the Meeting That Bennett Said Went So Well...
I wonder, what the supposed two German attendees thought of the discussion on UKIP? And who were these German attendees? Neo Natzis perhaps?
Quote:
__________________________________
AntiCS
Post subject: Re: INVITATION TO A MEETING ON SAT 1 AUGUST TO DISCUSS MADELEINEPosted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:21 am
On Parole
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:05 pm
Posts: 1090
Location: In Hope .... of justice for Madeleine
To those people whose "wider agenda" at the meeting had more to do with UKIP politics than with justice for Maddie - shame on you.
My aversion to the UKIP surpasses my contempt of the McCanns.
__________________________________
UNQUOTE
See For Yourselves What A Sick Nazi Lover Tony Bennett Is!
So viv is now a trained solicitor. AGAIN??!
Post subject: Re: Police investigating malicious pro-McCann forums & blogs
New postPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 6:13 pm
Mafia Boss
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 11:58 pm
Posts: 3278
TM I regret to say, you are like a stuck gramaphone record. How TB decides to pursue people who have abused him is a matter for him regardless of what you repeatedly harp on about with your very limited knowledge of the law. If you had any comprehension for one thing you would understand that Tony would need to pay a lawyer to take a civil action against people who he is not even clear who they are. He could and undoubtedly would incur a huge costs bill that would get him nowhere. Asking the police to investigate them and deal with them if possible is the simple and obvious route to seek redress.
What is obvious is that they wished to argue that the statement was the truth but the Appeal Court would not allow the defence.
It may be obvious to you, but it is not to a rational person. You have not read the article and you have not read the Appeal Court judgment, neither have you studied and worked in criminal justice as I have. Many people who lack education and insight, perceive things are "just obvious", that demonstrates a mind that just does not want to bother to even inquire, tunnel vision. I can understand why people take the attitude against you that they do.
There is a difference between disagreeing with Mr Bennett and just conducting an endless slanging match with little knowledge to even back up what you say. You do yourself no credit, including by repeatedly harping on about a subject that Tony and I are trained in. You, quite obviously, are not!
Poor,poor viv, such a confused mind! We all remember when you said you were NOT a solicitor, after claiming you were!
Is Viv saying that TB is trained in pretendy internet law????
She did after all say, trained the same as her.
Post a Comment