Wednesday, 8 September 2010

The Name "Hewlett" is The Name That Will Just Not Go Away!

The name Hewlett will just not go away in connection with abducted Madeleine McCann.

Raymond Hewlett was a convicted paedophile who had been imprisoned for some of his crimes, amongst those crimes against children was "drugging" and "subduing" with the use of chemicals.

There is "thought" that Madeleine may have been drugged or "subdued" in some way just prior to her abduction.

Hewlett was known to have been in the vicinity when Madeleine was abducted, yet solely because of the incompetence (or maybe even worse) of the Portuguese police coordinator Goncalo Amaral who was sacked from his position and who later took "early retirement", this man who should have been arrested and thoroughly questioned, was NOT!

There have been reports that people have reported seeing Madeleine in a white van van immediately after her abduction.

Raymond Hewlett said he has never owned a white van, yet acquaintances of Hewlett have maintained that Hewlett DID have a white van hidden somewhere at the time of Madeleine's abduction.

When Hewlett and his partner Mariana and their family left Portugal for Germany, they started their journey in a white van. Tragically en-route Hewlett's small son fell out of the van while travelling through Spain, yet neither Hewlett or Mariana realised that their child had fallen from the van! Apparently not until they had travelled a few miles on did they realise he was missing, they then had to turn their van around and travel back.
It is not known whether they came upon the scene at the roadside, but Hewlett's poor little lad was tragically killed in the accident, it is so very sad, a child that was clearly disadvantaged in life and had so little, lost his life by falling from his parents van and apparently was not even missed, it makes you want to weep.
The Spanish police apparently impounded the van and apparently may still have this van in their possession.
Hewlett and Mariana's child was apparently interred in an unmarked grave and his parents were reported to want to continue with their journey very quickly, "in indecent haste" one report writes.
It is well known that this family lived a hand to mouth existence, so how could they and their five children simply carry on by rail to Germany affording the fair for two adults and five children? They would also have to feed their children and themselves on the way. How did they manage to have so much money with them to enable them to do all of this?

There were reports that Hewlett suddenly had money and did not ever seem to be short of money, this happened not long after Madeleine was abducted, why was this never investigated?

Hewlett's partner Mariana has been likened to Kate, true in one photograph I have seen she does resemble her a little, why wasn't this fully investigated? It is of absolute vital importance because of a number of reports that maintain they saw a female resembling Kate's description handing over a child, it was not Kate, because Kate's whereabouts can be accounted for at those times, so who was it? One such report comes from the father of a Portuguese police officer, who claims to have had four adults in his cab, one a woman resembling Kate McCann and another a male resembling Robert Murat. However, it has subsequently come to light that the date that the cab driver gave as the date he said the incident took place was an incorrect date, as Madeleine had NOT then gone missing. There were so many lies and spinning of this story going on at the time that it is almost impossible to get at the truth. However, for a police investigation wanting to get to truth of who took Madeleine and why, all avenues should have been investigated and must still be investigated. One of the most obvious solutions to getting at the truth, would be to try and see if the taxi driver could have perhaps accidentally mixed the dates up? Was he in the habit of logging each fare at the time he did it? If so, then this is unlikely to carry much weight, unless of course he mistook the date, it happens, but how likely this is depends very much on the personality of the cab driver himself, which is yet another reason why he should have been interviewed. However, the proclivity is there that if he did not log details at the time and only did this every few days, then there could have been room for error.
Could this person he maintains he saw have been Mariana in the act of handing the child over, or possibly moving her on? Where is this jeep with foreign number plates, was this ever traced? Could this whole incident possibly be linked with the incident reported in the Barcelona night club in some way?

Who knows? With the utter garbage that has been written about this poor child's parents it makes it virtually impossible to get to the truth, one can only hope that the McCanns private investigators have more luck!

But whatever the answers are, there 'are' answers, and they 'are' there. Someone in Praia da Luz knows what happened to Madeleine McCann and who took her and why.  It is just a matter of piecing them all the pieces together, Raymond Hewlett a convicted paedophile and his name keeps popping up  in relation to Madeleine's disappearance like the proverbial bad penny. Before he died, Hewlett has said he had an alibi for the night Madeleine went missing but refused to divulge it, this is not alibi, this is just avoiding telling the truth, and if he did have an alibi for that night perhaps his partner Mariana, now living in Germany, may like to tell police about it? In fact, why haven't police formally interviewed Mariana? There are strong reasons why she should be spoken to, not only did she vaguely resemble Kate at the time of Madeleine's disappearance, Mariana's own distinct features are quite masculine, she also dresses in a very masculine way (unlike Kate McCann), this woman does resemble  the description of the "man" said to have carried Madeleine away that night, in fact Mariana resembles"sketchman" more than sketchman does! There is definitely a case to made for the formal questioning of Mariana.

There are 6 or 7 people that need to be formally and seriously questioned about Madeleine's abduction, one of those has died, the others are; Hewlett's partner Mariana; Robert Murat and his now wife Michaela; Sergy Malinka; Goncalo Amaral and Ricardo Paiva.

I write this because I am trying to be as honest as I can. Writing about the disappearance of a child is such an emotive issue and in this particular case, I defy any "sane" person not to have great sympathy or feel great empathy for Madeleine's parents, this is an ongoing nightmare that this unfortunate couple cannot wake up from.
I have no desire or wish to harm any other innocent person, however  this is all very noble as a child has been abducted and she remains missing and her parents seem to be bashing their heads against a brick wall to try and get the authorities to act in this case. In probability the only evidence that is available and despite the Portuguese police attempts to keep it hidden but nonetheless keeps cropping up, actually points to Madeleine still being alive. All things considered, I believe it is right to name names and to  keep pushing the Portuguese government and Portuguese police and the British government and the British police to investigate this case properly, because one overriding fact is, that the case of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann has NEVER been investigated properly officially and this is a travesty of justice for the little girl and her parents. The Portuguese police refuse to  cooperate with anyone or any other agency concerning Madeleine's disappearance and the British police have behaved in nothing short of an apathetic way and they too, cannot escape criticisms, the Leicestershire police come across as lazy and ignorant and on several occasions have been found wanting. They have allowed the stalking of the McCanns to go unchecked on their very doorstep, when a "crew" of miscreants among them, disgraced ex-solicitor and seeker of fame and attention Tony Bennett; attention seeker and generally thick and nasty person Deborah Butler, who was outed by the Sunday Express as being a vile stalker of the McCanns and who is also a proven liar and waster of police time and resources; Grenville and Helene Green and Sharon Brady all these people took it upon themselves to write vile untruths and print them up in libellous leaflet form and actually distribute them in the McCanns home village and in the very street where they lived and the Leicestershire police actually claimed to have no knowledge of this, despite it being on the BBC national news, on several local radio stations, (their own included) local papers and the national press! So these people broke the law and got away with a vile crime. The Leicestershire police keep saying it is a Portuguese investigation but that is the whole point, the Portuguese police are NOT investigating this and the investigation has been shelved for almost 2 years, yet this is the lie that the Leicestershire police keep trotting out. Incompetent bunch of morons, this is exactly the kind of attitude they had towards a disabled mother who felt so helpless and unable to defend her disabled daughter and herself form anti-social behaviour that she took their lives - despicable behaviour by the police.

It is not the ordinary people that have forgotten how to report things they feel are not right, it is the abject failure of BOTH the British and the Portuguese police, to take those reports and investigate them properly and it is the abject failure of the Portuguese government to oversee its own police force and force them to investigate Madeleine's disappearance properly.

This case can and MUST be the subject of a complete  review, both in the UK and in Portugal. The outgoing labour government and the then Home Secretary Alan Johnson, ordered the British police to carry out this review, this is now in doubt with the new coalition government, who have backtracked on everything they have promised, they are now penny pinching and it looks like the much awaited and promised review is now not going to happen and apparently no explanation has been offered to the parents of Madeleine.

While in opposition David Cameron (now the Prime Minister of Britain) met the McCanns and promised his help, it is about time he honoured those promises, or was this just another pre-election promise he had no intention of keeping? Along with a whole string of other broken pledges and promises?

Meanwhile the Portuguese government must order a full PUBLIC review of this case, they must formally question Goncalo Amaral and Ricardo Paiva. It must be discovered for certain if Robert Murat had anything to do with Madeleine's disappearance, I say this not without reason, after reading extensively into what he and others have said about him in the Portuguese police files  and how he changed his alibi a couple of times and the reports about his behaviour at the time were so bizarre they are alarming.  There are also reports about the "odd" actions and behaviour of his mother, there does exist a strange fact within the Murat family, where close family members do not seem to know how they are related and there is this totally bizarre phenomena where in a small sleepy fishing village on the Algarve, several striking Robert Murat lookalikes reside and Robert Murat had an affair with the wife of one of his lookalikes, not only that he actually lived under the same roof as his lover and her former husband, Luis Antonio, who also worked as a pool-man at the Mark Warner Ocean Complex at the time Madeleine disappeared. From reading the files, the Murat part of this investigation was never really carried out properly and it is still unknown if Murat and Goncalo Amaral knew each other or knew of each other prior to Madeleine's disappearance. Amaral appears to have totally ignored the amount of mystery surrounding Robert Murat.

The Madeleine investigation was never updated, it was never reviewed properly and because of the ludicrous Portuguese secrecy rules, the investigation itself and the people who were supposed to be  carrying out the investigating never knew what their own objectives were, they were never fully briefed, never even given a photo of Madeleine when they were supposed to be searching for her in the early days, in fact the only people h who had the photos printed up were her parents and it was Goncalo Amaral who decided to try and use this as some strange reason that they were covering up their daughter;s disappearance, apparently Goncalo Amaral the chief inspector s coordinator of the investigation did not want to have publicity, so everyone was working in the dark - literally! Amaral was the chief cause of why this this investigation totally lost its way. Goncalo Amaral made every single mistake under the sun that there was to make, yet we are expected to believe he was this "incredible" detective with all this wonderful experience while at the same time expected to believe that it is normal that he makes every single mistake there was to make? Sorry this does not wash, all these mistakes allowed Madeleine's abductors to get clean away and this whole case is enshrined by incompetence, secrecy, lies, leaks and smears trying to pin the blame of Madeleine's disappearance on her parents - why?

I am just an ordinary person, I did not expect to find myself in this position to keep lobbying the police and the government of both countries over the disappearance of this little girl, but now that I do find myself in this position I am not going to drop this until the truth comes out and those responsible are made to pay for what they have done, and above all Madeleine is found and returned to her parents.

To Goncalo Amaral

When I take a look at this investigation and scratch the surface and see all that just isn't right, it is unconscionable that while a child is still missing and her parents and family are still suffering, that we can just pass by on the other side and do nothing, so I will never do that. While I (and others) continue to keep this case and Madeleine high profile, the perpetrators who took Madeleine and those that know what happened to her, will never, ever be safe from detection, of this I promise you. One day Goncalo Amaral, your sins will find you out!

Rosie

'I know who took Madeleine McCann'

Deathbed letter from paedophile suspect makes abduction clue claim


From a report dated 1st September 2010
A paedophile suspected of being involved in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann 'confessed' to knowing what happened to the little girl on his deathbed, it has been claimed.
Raymond Hewlett wrote to his estranged son denying he played a part in the three-year-old’s abduction, but claimed he knew she had been ‘stolen to order’ by a gypsy gang.
Cancer sufferer Hewlett, who has a record of raping and abducting children, had previously claimed to have seen the missing toddler twice before she vanished in 2007.

But he vowed only to reveal where he was the night she went missing if he was paid thousands of pounds.
Kate and Gerry McCann’s private detectives refused the request.
Today his son Wayne claimed to the Sun that the letter was delivered to him by a mystery man a week after he died in April.
Wayne, who has had no contact with his father for 20 years, claimed his father insisted he had nothing to do with Madeleine’s disappearance – but that he knew who did.
He said: ‘He said a very good gipsy friend he knew in Portugal had got drunk and “let it out” that he had stolen Maddie to order as part of a gang.


‘My dad said this gang had been operating for a long time and had snatched children before for couples who couldn’t have children of their own.
‘Maddie had been targeted. They took photos of children and send them to the people they were acting for. And they said Yes or No.’
 Private detectives working for the McCanns are said to be ‘extremely interested’ in the claims and are preparing to interview Wayne.
Wayne, 40, says he burned the letter because it ‘unnerved’ him so much.

The Sun reported they learned of the existence of the note through another source and confirmed they had not been approached by Wayne originally.
Madeleine went missing from The Ocean Club Hotel in Praia da Luz in the Portuguese Algarve while her parents dined at a restaurant on the resort.
Hewlett was living with his family on a campsite an hour’s drive away at the time.

Source:
Daily Mail

Monday, 23 August 2010

It's Been a while!

It has been over three months since this blog was updated, I purposefully have left it this long to see what happened. Over the years we have been told by people to ignore certain people and they will stop their despicable behaviour towards the McCanns and little Madeleine, anything is worth a try! So we tried it and sadly nothing changed, they did not stop their venom, their nastiness, which proves it is a psychological need of those people to reach out and hurt others. The fact that after over 3 years 3 months, these people are still spreading their malicious vile lies and innuendos speaks volumes, not about Kate and Gerry McCann or those that want to help and support them, but it says more about themselves and their need to spread lies and hurt to two people who only want to be left alone to find their child.
People Like Debbie Butler, Tony Bennett, Joana Morais and Amberslu*, Brenda Ryan, Vanessa Sluming, Grenville and Helene Green, Sharon Bradford, Sharon Lawrence, are just sub-humans, I doubt if Madeleine was found tomorrow that they would stop, the hate by now is ingrained in their mentally disturbed psyches and ignoring them does not make a scrap of difference, in fact their mental illnesses have worsened, which makes the needs for blogs and forums like this one to counteract their lies and disinformation all the more necessary.

Sunday, 11 April 2010

BRITS LAUNCH "MADDIE" PROBE


BRITISH police are to launch a new probe into missing Madeleine McCann after massive failures were found in the Portuguese investigation.
Our top child protection cop Jim Gamble has completed a fresh look at the three-year-old investigation for the Home Office.
He told ministers there were huge holes in the original inquiry that need to be revisited if they want to "come close" to reaching UK standards.
It will come as a bitter pill for Portuguese investigators who have fended off criticism since Maddie disappeared in 2007


Portugese police left 'gaping' holes

But parents Kate and Gerry McCann, both 41 and both doctors, are "delighted" at the move.
Failures in the original investigation are said to be "so gaping" that British authorities feel it is their duty to look at it again.
This time police will review all the leads using technology and standards expected in a homicide or kidnap case in the UK.
Mr Gamble, head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre, found a basic failure to collate information and join up links that should have been made.
Telephone records were not properly analysed, missing early opportunities for leads.
And Kate and Gerry McCann were named as Arguidos, or formal suspects, by Portuguese police - something that the review says would not have happened if the probe had been carried out in the UK.
Mr Gamble found no evidence sufficient to make them suspects. His findings have now been formally submitted to the Home Office with recommendations to re-investigate.
The damning review has now set the Association of Chief Police Officers the difficult task of trying to decide who takes on the mammoth task. It is already predicted to be "an extremely costly" investigation that, even if done properly, will probably never be solved.


Damning: Jim Gamble

A source said: "It is something that has to be reviewed. It is only right that the McCanns are given the satisfaction that everything that could be done has been done. It now comes down to who is up to the job."
The Home Secretary Alan Johnson is expected to announce that the new probe will NOT be carried out by Leicestershire police, the McCanns' local force. The review has highlighted failures within their handling of the case and ruled them out of the review.
Instead ACPO are now asking around their top cops to see who could take on the very difficult and complex investigation.
The source added: "It will be extremely costly and sadly is unlikely to result in a positive outcome.
"As much as we would all like this to end with good news for the McCanns, the fact is there have been a lot of missed opportunities and no-one will ever be able to reclaim the time and evidence lost."
Two thousand pages of evidence released earlier claimed Portuguese detectives failed to follow up leads.
Home Secretary Alan Johnson ordered officials to examine the "feasibility" of British detectives having a fresh look at all the evidence back in March.
Kate and Gerry McCann, of Rothley, met Mr Johnson to plead for help in their search for their daughter who vanished aged three from a holiday apartment in Praia da Luz, Portugal.

Wednesday, 7 April 2010


Human Rights lawyer Dr Marcos Aragao Correia has made and lodged the appeal against the decision not to send Goncalo Amaral to trial, for the alleged torture of Leandro Silva. The appeal was sent to the court last week. Because of this appeal, the decision of the judge of not sending Amaral to trial is suspended, and this means Amaral will *STILL BE AN ARGUIDO* for that criminal procedure. Dr Marcos aragao Correia has also decided not only to work for free - as he as always done until now concerning Leonor and Leandro, but he also paid all the judicial taxes for that appeal! Making a stark contrast to Goncalo Amaral, the disgraced former detective in the Madeleine McCann case, who has been finding many ways to make an obscene amount of money off of the back of an innocent missing Madeleine and buying up luxury apartments worth 600.000 euros allegedly in another persons name and driving around in a 60.000 euro Jaguar bought out of earnings made out of that child, by tormenting her parents with lies and defamation. Hopefully, the appeal when it is heard, will not be heard by the same judge and the 2nd judge will come to a different conclusion and send Goncalo Amaral for trial, where everyone knows he should go.

A n Open Letter To Goncalo Amaral from the human rights lawyer Dr Marcos Aragao Correia:

QUOTE:__________________________________________

To Mr "Beast" Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral:
 
Just a few words about your new, false and defaming complaint against me to the Portuguese Bar, because we know that you Mr "Beast" Gonçalo, and your "satanic" followers, use to read this website.
How can you even insinuate that you’re not a beast? Don’t you have mirrors in your luxury apartment?

For Jesus sake, don’t lie so much! We know that your horns can not be seen cause their are well hidden, but please don’t try to hide your apparent "bestiality"! It’s too much!
So, you say that you’re not a beast? Hypocrite you are!
Just remember,


- Perhaps The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to Madeleine, Kate and Gerry?
- Perhaos The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to Joana, Leonor and Leandro?
- Perhaps The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to Diana, Ana and JosĂ©?
- Perhaps The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to all the children victims of violence, and their parents, by allegedly protecting the criminals involved on Joana and Madeleine kidnappings?
- Perhaps The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to all the good Portuguese and British citizens by incentivizing a fascist country and a fascist police based on fake criminal investigations using torture?
Is not enough?
So, do you still maintain you’re not a beast?
Of course you are, and me and my witnesses are just going to confirm that to the Bar.
And may I inform you that the appeal of Leandro to the superior Court of Évora is already done and delivered in the Court of Faro? Yes, it’s true, so don’t sing victory yet.
And by the way, even if the fascist regime continues to protect you, don’t worry: true Justice will always be done in the end! I’m not atheist neither a Satan follower! So, True Divine Justice will always win in the end! Do you want to wait to see? Maybe it will be too late then... So, here’s my advice to you: repent of all the evil you are, ask forgiveness to all these innocent children and their parents, and divulge the names of all the criminals involved in those monstrous crimes against them, and only then I’ll stop calling what you apparently are: a BEAST! A ferocious beast from the depths of Hell.


WE ARE WATCHING YOU.


UNQUOTE________________________________________

So Goncalo Amaral and his wife are preparing to move into a large luxury apartment costing €600.000 euros? This apartment is situated right in front of his existing apartment and has allegedly been purchased by Amaral registered in another person's name? Who's name is that Marcos? Could it be Sofia Amaral? Or another of his family, or a friend perhaps?

I understand too that he has a special parking place to park his luxury limousine €60.000 Jaguar motor car, which he is still driving around in?

All bought and paid for by missing abducted Madeleine McCann.

Shame on Goncalo Amaral and shame on those who help him to do this. When they do things like this, perhaps they should not complain about being called a "Beast"? That is mild, they could be called a lot worse! Like a vile pimp, living off immoral earnings by cashing in on an innocent child's disappearance! And now I understand that Paypal have unfrozen the account that Joana Morais and others set up, in which to persuade people to give money to Goncalo Amaral and meantime he has just purchased in secret a €600.000 luxury apartment? And he has Joana Morais taking pensions off of pensioners by getting them to make donations to a man living this lifestyle? How dishonest and corrupt is this? And have none of them any shame?And these people have the temerity to accuse the McCanns and the fund, even though that fund is open, honest and above board and is used solely to fund the search for Madeleine?Amaral, Joana Morais and the rest are just damned vile hypocrites!When is the Portuguese government and judiciary going to do something about this man? Portugal looks to be still a fascist police state and this man Goncalo Amaral, appears to be right in the thick of it. Is the Portuguese government and judiciary scared of Amaral? Scared that he may open his mouth and start incriminating them? I can only think this may be true, or else someone would have acted to stop this allegedly corrupt man in his tracks, he is ruining the reputation of Portugal, they have to be seen to do something about this man and pretty damned quick too!

*** Goncalo Amaral Aka "The Beast" *** Purchases €600.000 luxury apartment and registers it in another's name! *** Still Driving Around in his €60.000 luxury Jaguar Motor Car *** Yet Completely without morals and scruples takes money from pensioners to fund his lifestyle *** Joana Morais - Helps with this "Fund raising" to maintain the luxury lifestyle of Goncalo Amaral ***

DON'T GIVE MONEY TO GONCALO AMARAL HE IS RICH ENOUGH WITH "HIDDEN" WEALTH!

Sunday, 21 March 2010

Oh Dear It Seems That Yesterday I Upset the "Right Wing" Apparatchik "Claudia79"


Goncalo Amaral


She came out fighting in her defence of her fallen "hero" Goncalo Amaral! Claudia was in full apparatchick mode and wasted not a minute trying to shoot me down in flames, but in her haste, she forgot how much I know about her and her "hero" Goncalo Amaral.
They say "the truth hurts"!




(Thanks To PFA and JATYK)


QUOTE:________________________


: Rosie sums up murat Vs Tanner.by dcb2 » Sun Mar 21, 2010 2:42 am "Claudia79 Today at 01:03amethyst wrote:The coordinator (Amaral) still nowhere to be seen does NOT interview her or even speak to her , even though we know he speaks fairly good English.----------does he?


Reply By Claudia 79


Mr Amaral certainly does not speak English. He has asked me for help translating some e-mails and other things so I am positive about that. And coordinators don't interview witnesses or suspects. They coordinate.


UNQUOTE:_________________________




"Number 1........ Dear Liar Claudia


You do not need to be a translator to understand that actually SPEAKING the language, is a far cry from writing it and understanding it and comprehending the written language. Should you not actually know this Claudia? Or do you really think that everyone (except you) is stupid?


Number 2........


When you see your "friend" again, tell him he ought to be very careful who he speaks to, I wouldn't want to make him paranoid but.......................


Number 3........


So now we have it from the horses sorry your mouth (same difference) What we said about you being a PJ plant on the Daily Express blog was absolutely true.


*********************



Claudia, the fact that when you were asked all these questions on the Daily Express blog, you LIED and LIED and LIED repeatedly. Which makes you nothing but a dirty LIAR who cannot be trusted, not then, not now and not ever.

Question that people should now ask you is why you LIED? They may not ask you Claudia, but I will, because I am not afraid of you, I hate LIARS, especially those that lie with the sole purpose of actually deceiving people who trusted you.

The people over here on blogs and forums like the former forum the 3 arguidos, who trusted you and offered you friendship and respect and you took that, and LIED back at them, right in their faces.


The fact that you came to that blog, (and other such places) knowing it was a national newspaper blog and read by many people in the UK and you were ("probably") PAID by Goncalo Amaral to spread his lies and misinformation, spread the leaks, the innuendos and to purposefully blacken the characters of two innocent people, now we know that you were a ("probably") fully PAID member of spreading DISINFORMATION. And your aim? What was your aim in all of this Claudia? Shall I tell your friends that you have been deceiving and LYING to all of them all of this time, or do you want to do it? Your aim and the aim of your right wing "friend" a coordinator of the right wing policia judiciaria, was to totally frustrate, hinder, hamper and utterly destroy the search for that innocent little child.


Tell us Claudia, (and be very careful to tell the truth now, because you have no idea what I know) please tell those people who trusted and respected you, why you blatantly lied to them and why you did NOT want Madeleine McCann found. Tell these people how a friend of mine and myself sent off an email to a certain person in Portugal, in the Policia Judiciaria one evening and before the morning broke, both you and your friend "Alsabella" knew of that email, knew of the content and were speaking of it on the Daily Express blog and laughing at parts of it. We have the email saved, we have the screenshots, don't bother to deny it and make yourself look an even bigger LIAR (If that is at all possible)! The offices it was sent to were closed for day, so how did you get hold of that email, read it and start work on it to destroy the content immediately? In fact why did you deem the content of that email so important that it you thought it warranted immediate attention and destruction? Could it be that this email hit very very close to the truth? It did, didn't it Claudia? Don't worry though, obviously we have not forgotten this email and your response to it and with what later transpired in 2009, it turns out we were probably banging very loudly on the door of the truth.

Thing is Claudia, how did you know this?


Why did you try and destroy two innocent people, what had they ever done to you? More, what did that poor little girl ever do to you, that you would allow yourself to be ("probably") PAID to destroy any chance of ever finding that child?


Remember that wooden parquet flooring that you and your friend swore was there? We told you repeatedly that it was NOT in that apartment, but for some reason both you and your former "friend" went into overdrive and went to great lengths to spread the totally false conception that there was this wooden flooring in apartment 5a, at the time we could not understand why you would do this, we realised it must have significance as we also realised very early on that everything you did on that blog (and others) had a reason and that purpose was usually to blacken the McCanns characters and destroy any hope of ever finding Madeleine, by persuading people to think that she was dead and that her parents concealed her body. In fact your "party" line was almost exactly the same as your "friend" Amaral's, just as he much later wrote in his book. The reason why it was so important to you and your friend "Alsabella" that everyone think that there was wooden flooring in that apartment, was because it was part of Amaral's "thesis" that Madeleine's blood was found seeped into the wooden block tiles. I remember when the first photos were released that clearly showed there were NO wooden tiles in apartment 5a, you and your "friend" went into almost hysterical overdrive, to say that there was wooden flooring and that the photos were wrong, taken in the wrong apartment etc etc, we were not wrong, there is NO wooden block flooring in apartment 5a, yet you and your "friend" done your ("probable") PAID job of spreading DISINFORMATION so well, that even to this very day some people still believe your lies and still think there are wooden tiles in that apartment that were found to have Madeleine's blood on them.


Here you still are Claudia, still to this very day defending your right wing "friend" Goncalo Amaral and telling your lies and spreading your disinformation. You even opened your blog "Proud of the PJ", so proud of them were you, that when an active PJ detective met with a mysterious "accident" and the poor man was murdered killed, you were so proud of the PJ that you did NOT even bother to give it a mention on your blog, not one single solitary line. Now I think that a person running a blog that names it "PROUD OF THE PJ" and does not give a mention to a serving PJ member's death, is a bit of an enigma, I wonder if others think this too? Don't worry that did not go unnoticed, we did point it out to you at the time, it is all a matter of record.


What are you Claudia? Part of some underground right wing movement that wants Portugal to return to the bad old days? Where right wing cops ruled the country and people were terrified of them? Was Madeleine taken for sale to top up the funds of your "Right Wing Movement"? Was Joana Cipriano taken to sell for the same reason? I wonder now how your friends and those that have hung on your every Right Wing word feel, knowing that you have been lying to them all this time and leading them to think things that were just not true? Will they ever believe a word you say anymore?


Goncalo Amaral, NEVER attended the scene of a serious crime unfolding on his patch, he preferred to stay drinking with his buddies. As a police chief inspector AND coordinator that was a very strange thing to do. As you point out Claudia, Amaral is paid to "COORDINATE" and he could not be bothered to even turn up to do his job.


He did NOT even bother to turn up the next day either, as you have told us you have Goncalo Amaral's ear (be careful Amaral has a thing about ears), well perhaps you could ask him, when was the first time that he attended the scene in Praia da Luz? Please ask him if the very first time he attended the scene was when he turned up with the TV company to make his "mockumentary " documentary? You know the DVD he made, where he sold the rights of his book of lies to the TV company for an undisclosed sum said to run into SIX FIGURES. Where he was filmed standing in the road outside doing that thing with his hands, that thing which all psychologists say points to the fact that the person doing this is telling bare faced lies. (Do you do that too Claudia?)


How can a person write a book filled with such information about the apartment, when he had up to that time NEVER even been inside it? How can a person write a book accusing two people of concealing the body of their beloved child when he has NEVER once met those people and never once spoken to them, DESPITE GONCALO AMARAL SPEAKING FAIRLY GOOD ENGLISH?



  • If Amaral wanted to get to the truth so desperately like he maintains, why did he NEVER speak to Mr Mrs McCann?

  • Why did Amaral FAIL to COORDINATE the search he was paid to COORDINATE?

  • Why does Amaral blame everyone else for his shortcomings and his failures?

  • And why does he ("probably") PAY people like you to come onto blogs and forums in the UK to spread these malevolent LIES?

By getting the truthful answers to these questions, we will be closer to discovering who took Madeleine McCann and why MUCH, MUCH CLOSER!


You are nothing but a LIAR Claudia, employed and paid by another LIAR.


You have been sussed!


Bye Bye time for you to disappear, (just like your "friend" Alsabella, when she was sussed.)


What did Madeleine McCann a small innocent little girl ever do to you?


What did Joana Cipriano ever do to you?



"I Clauidia" Beware The "Ides" of "May" - Karma Is Almost Upon You!'


GONCALO AMARAL DOES SPEAK FAIRLY GOOD ENGLISH "BETTER THAN MOST PEOPLE REALISE"


And that is a FACT!

Saturday, 20 March 2010

The Strange Oddity That Is The Murat Vs Tanner Debacle!


Robert Murat Sharing a Smoke With His Portuguese Police "Friends"
Isn't it a strange coincidence that Amaral appears as a witness FOR Robert Murat, at a time when he (Amaral) is being widely discredited? Isn't it strange, that if Antonio Cabrita, Amaral's lawyer's secretary had not been in contact with "swine flu" and this bizarrely lead to Antonio Cabrita being quarantined, (why?) giving him the excuse NOT to attend court and getting the whole hearing adjourned, the the Murat Vs Tanner oddity would have happened at another time when Amaral's hearing was INACTIVE.
Call me cynical, but Amaral obviously knew of the Murat hearing as he was going to appear as a witness, he knew the dates of the hearings, so he managed to get his own book ban hearing adjourned. As it is, this along with everything else that Amaral touches these days blew up in his face. I think Amaral is suffering with "reverse Midas touch"
How odd is this Murat vs Tanner thing?
It is patently absurd!
A brief run down....
  • A child is abducted from her bed.....
  • The PJ coordinator decides to stay drinking with his pals rather than attend the scene of a serious crime to actually do his job and "COORDINATE" it.
  • A witness who believes she may have seen something comes forward and reports what she has seen to the police.
  • The coordinator (Amaral) still nowhere to be seen does NOT interview her or even speak to her , even though we know he speaks fairly good English.
  • Some time later this witness is then taken to a van with blacked out windows and asked to observe Robert Murat walking along the street.
  • The coordinator, "coordinating" the investigation into a missing child, is still NOT present in this van (despite giving the impression to certain newspapers that he was)
  • The witness categorically states that Robert Murat was NOT the man she saw walking along with a child in his arms that night of Thursday May 3, 2007.
  • The witness then repeats this testament in her witness statement (where again the coordinator who was supposed to be "coordinating" was not in fact coordinating and was NOT present.
  • The said "coordinator then gets sacked from this investigation after five months of not coordinating it, (five months of NOT doing his job properly) five months during which he has not even bothered to speak to the parents of the missing child, (despite speaking fairly good English)
  • The non coordinating "coordinator" gets the sack for serious professional misconduct. He then takes early retirement from his non coordinating "coordinator's" position and has a grudge against the parents of a missing child.
  • The now sacked non coordinating "coordinator" decides to write a book, where he blatantly libels the other argudio in that investigation Robert Murat.
  • Robert Murat seemingly ignores the Portuguese press attempts to assassinate his character of which the non coordinating "coordinator" Goncalo Amaral was responsible for the lies and leaks that appeared in the press in Portugal and were the basis for the British press reports!
  • In 2008 Robert Murat successfully sues the British press for libel and defamation, while ignoring the the true source of the stories, coming from the non coordinating "coordinator" and the Portuguese press! (still with me?)
  • We then hear absolutely nothing from former arguido Robert Murat until 2010.
  • Murat was actually made an arguido (suspect) in Madeleine's disappearance under the instructions of (wait for it....) the non coordinating "coordinator" Goncalo Amaral himself.
  • Meanwhile the non coordinating "coordinator" Goncalo Amaral has landed himself in all kinds of bother, he has been convicted of a criminal offence, perverting the course of justice, concealing a torture, convicted of perjury and just plain lying all over the place.
  • Goncalo Amaral has been exposed as the main protagonist in other controversial investigations and now there appears to be some kind of link, "linking him in with Casa Pia". (Casa Pia is the Portuguese orphanage at the center of child pornography and abuse allegations embroiling many police, doctors and judiciary, politicians etc.)
  • Not only the above (there is much more still to emerge) but the non coordinating "coordinator", decided to make himself an obscene amount of money off of the back of an innocent missing child, who's investigation he did not bother to "coordinate" by accusing her parents of murdering her and concealing her body and writing this all down in a book!
  • This book which has now been banned and the ban upheld twice.
  • These are the self same parents Goncalo Amaral, despite being the non coordinating "coordinator" NEVER bothered to meet and talk to NOT one single time, despite him (Amaral the non coordinating "coordinator") speaking fairly good English!
  • However in the non coordinating "coordinator's" book, he also accuses outright one Robert Murat! Which Murat completely ignores and decides instead to accuse a witness who was only giving a statement to police, of saying that she saw him at the scene
  • Bizarre? Yes it certainly is! Even more bizarre when you realise the witness has never once accused Murat, in fact she said the man she saw was NOT him!
  • So now we are at this strange place of Murat after being silent for all this time, suddenly decides to register a case against a witness, who was only doing her civic duty and reporting to police what she saw, or she thought she saw!
  • Murat ignores the outright accusations of Amaral the non coordinating "coordinator".
  • Murat ignores all the other people that are in the official files as saying they thought him and his behaviour very odd.
  • Murat ignores all the other eye witnesses who have no axe to grind when they reported as seeing him outside the apartment where the child disappeared from.
  • Murat totally ignores a police sworn and signed statement of a person who maintains that he Murat, behaved oddly, by throwing things out of an upstairs window into the street below where he could have hurt or killed passers by, (including children) ignored that this witness said that Murat tried to have sex with animals, has killed animals and tried to rape his cousin.
  • Murat has totally ignored reports that he has changed his alibi several times (It is all there in the official files)

Yet bizarrely Murat files an intention to sue Jane Tanner for libel, because she said she did NOT see him that night.

Now you can call me cynical if you like but look at the timing. How convenient was it that this story emerge now right in the middle of the non coordinating "coordinator's" unsuccessful attempts to have the ban on his book overturned?

Amaral non coordinating "coordinator" knew of Murat's intention, he had to as he himself said he was called as a witness!

The non coordinating "coordinator", knew of the court dates set. The non coordinating "coordinator" has a grudge against the McCanns and their friends, he blames them for him losing his coordinating position despite never actually bothering to do his job and coordinate!Odd? More than just a little odd, this is the non story that will suddenly sprout legs and do "completely" for Amaral, like no other story has yet done for him completely.

The truth about Murat and Amaral will come out when Murat is questioned over why he decided to bring this action against Jane Tanner. *Mark my words*, do you honestly think that her legal team will allow this to slip through the net?

Who put Murat up to trying to prosecute Jane Tanner for simply being a witness and telling what she thought she saw?

Why did Murat ignore all those other appalling blemishes on his character, reported by other people and decide to prosecute JT for saying she did NOT see Murat? This is one "witness interference" that Amaral is going to wish he stayed well clear of.

Remember my words

"From little acorns, mighty oaks do grow"!

Minute For Madeleine McCann

Locate IP Address on Map