Madeleine Beth McCann

The Name "Hewlett" is The Name That Will Just Not Go Away!

2010-09-08T14:22:00.003+01:00

The name Hewlett will just not go away in connection with abducted Madeleine McCann.

Raymond Hewlett was a convicted paedophile who had been imprisoned for some of his crimes, amongst those crimes against children was "drugging" and "subduing" with the use of chemicals.

There is "thought" that Madeleine may have been drugged or "subdued" in some way just prior to her abduction.

Hewlett was known to have been in the vicinity when Madeleine was abducted, yet solely because of the incompetence (or maybe even worse) of the Portuguese police coordinator Goncalo Amaral who was sacked from his position and who later took "early retirement", this man who should have been arrested and thoroughly questioned, was NOT!

There have been reports that people have reported seeing Madeleine in a white van van immediately after her abduction.

Raymond Hewlett said he has never owned a white van, yet acquaintances of Hewlett have maintained that Hewlett DID have a white van hidden somewhere at the time of Madeleine's abduction.

When Hewlett and his partner Mariana and their family left Portugal for Germany, they started their journey in a white van. Tragically en-route Hewlett's small son fell out of the van while travelling through Spain, yet neither Hewlett or Mariana realised that their child had fallen from the van! Apparently not until they had travelled a few miles on did they realise he was missing, they then had to turn their van around and travel back.
It is not known whether they came upon the scene at the roadside, but Hewlett's poor little lad was tragically killed in the accident, it is so very sad, a child that was clearly disadvantaged in life and had so little, lost his life by falling from his parents van and apparently was not even missed, it makes you want to weep.
The Spanish police apparently impounded the van and apparently may still have this van in their possession.
Hewlett and Mariana's child was apparently interred in an unmarked grave and his parents were reported to want to continue with their journey very quickly, "in indecent haste" one report writes.
It is well known that this family lived a hand to mouth existence, so how could they and their five children simply carry on by rail to Germany affording the fair for two adults and five children? They would also have to feed their children and themselves on the way. How did they manage to have so much money with them to enable them to do all of this?

There were reports that Hewlett suddenly had money and did not ever seem to be short of money, this happened not long after Madeleine was abducted, why was this never investigated?

Hewlett's partner Mariana has been likened to Kate, true in one photograph I have seen she does resemble her a little, why wasn't this fully investigated? It is of absolute vital importance because of a number of reports that maintain they saw a female resembling Kate's description handing over a child, it was not Kate, because Kate's whereabouts can be accounted for at those times, so who was it? One such report comes from the father of a Portuguese police officer, who claims to have had four adults in his cab, one a woman resembling Kate McCann and another a male resembling Robert Murat. However, it has subsequently come to light that the date that the cab driver gave as the date he said the incident took place was an incorrect date, as Madeleine had NOT then gone missing. There were so many lies and spinning of this story going on at the time that it is almost impossible to get at the truth. However, for a police investigation wanting to get to truth of who took Madeleine and why, all avenues should have been investigated and must still be investigated. One of the most obvious solutions to getting at the truth, would be to try and see if the taxi driver could have perhaps accidentally mixed the dates up? Was he in the habit of logging each fare at the time he did it? If so, then this is unlikely to carry much weight, unless of course he mistook the date, it happens, but how likely this is depends very much on the personality of the cab driver himself, which is yet another reason why he should have been interviewed. However, the proclivity is there that if he did not log details at the time and only did this every few days, then there could have been room for error.
Could this person he maintains he saw have been Mariana in the act of handing the child over, or possibly moving her on? Where is this jeep with foreign number plates, was this ever traced? Could this whole incident possibly be linked with the incident reported in the Barcelona night club in some way?

Who knows? With the utter garbage that has been written about this poor child's parents it makes it virtually impossible to get to the truth, one can only hope that the McCanns private investigators have more luck!

But whatever the answers are, there 'are' answers, and they 'are' there. Someone in Praia da Luz knows what happened to Madeleine McCann and who took her and why. It is just a matter of piecing them all the pieces together, Raymond Hewlett a convicted paedophile and his name keeps popping up in relation to Madeleine's disappearance like the proverbial bad penny. Before he died, Hewlett has said he had an alibi for the night Madeleine went missing but refused to divulge it, this is not alibi, this is just avoiding telling the truth, and if he did have an alibi for that night perhaps his partner Mariana, now living in Germany, may like to tell police about it? In fact, why haven't police formally interviewed Mariana? There are strong reasons why she should be spoken to, not only did she vaguely resemble Kate at the time of Madeleine's disappearance, Mariana's own distinct features are quite masculine, she also dresses in a very masculine way (unlike Kate McCann), this woman does resemble the description of the "man" said to have carried Madeleine away that night, in fact Mariana resembles"sketchman" more than sketchman does! There is definitely a case to made for the formal questioning of Mariana.

There are 6 or 7 people that need to be formally and seriously questioned about Madeleine's abduction, one of those has died, the others are; Hewlett's partner Mariana; Robert Murat and his now wife Michaela; Sergy Malinka; Goncalo Amaral and Ricardo Paiva.

I write this because I am trying to be as honest as I can. Writing about the disappearance of a child is such an emotive issue and in this particular case, I defy any "sane" person not to have great sympathy or feel great empathy for Madeleine's parents, this is an ongoing nightmare that this unfortunate couple cannot wake up from.
I have no desire or wish to harm any other innocent person, however this is all very noble as a child has been abducted and she remains missing and her parents seem to be bashing their heads against a brick wall to try and get the authorities to act in this case. In probability the only evidence that is available and despite the Portuguese police attempts to keep it hidden but nonetheless keeps cropping up, actually points to Madeleine still being alive. All things considered, I believe it is right to name names and to keep pushing the Portuguese government and Portuguese police and the British government and the British police to investigate this case properly, because one overriding fact is, that the case of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann has NEVER been investigated properly officially and this is a travesty of justice for the little girl and her parents. The Portuguese police refuse to cooperate with anyone or any other agency concerning Madeleine's disappearance and the British police have behaved in nothing short of an apathetic way and they too, cannot escape criticisms, the Leicestershire police come across as lazy and ignorant and on several occasions have been found wanting. They have allowed the stalking of the McCanns to go unchecked on their very doorstep, when a "crew" of miscreants among them, disgraced ex-solicitor and seeker of fame and attention Tony Bennett; attention seeker and generally thick and nasty person Deborah Butler, who was outed by the Sunday Express as being a vile stalker of the McCanns and who is also a proven liar and waster of police time and resources; Grenville and Helene Green and Sharon Brady all these people took it upon themselves to write vile untruths and print them up in libellous leaflet form and actually distribute them in the McCanns home village and in the very street where they lived and the Leicestershire police actually claimed to have no knowledge of this, despite it being on the BBC national news, on several local radio stations, (their own included) local papers and the national press! So these people broke the law and got away with a vile crime. The Leicestershire police keep saying it is a Portuguese investigation but that is the whole point, the Portuguese police are NOT investigating this and the investigation has been shelved for almost 2 years, yet this is the lie that the Leicestershire police keep trotting out. Incompetent bunch of morons, this is exactly the kind of attitude they had towards a disabled mother who felt so helpless and unable to defend her disabled daughter and herself form anti-social behaviour that she took their lives - despicable behaviour by the police.

It is not the ordinary people that have forgotten how to report things they feel are not right, it is the abject failure of BOTH the British and the Portuguese police, to take those reports and investigate them properly and it is the abject failure of the Portuguese government to oversee its own police force and force them to investigate Madeleine's disappearance properly.

This case can and MUST be the subject of a complete review, both in the UK and in Portugal. The outgoing labour government and the then Home Secretary Alan Johnson, ordered the British police to carry out this review, this is now in doubt with the new coalition government, who have backtracked on everything they have promised, they are now penny pinching and it looks like the much awaited and promised review is now not going to happen and apparently no explanation has been offered to the parents of Madeleine.

While in opposition David Cameron (now the Prime Minister of Britain) met the McCanns and promised his help, it is about time he honoured those promises, or was this just another pre-election promise he had no intention of keeping? Along with a whole string of other broken pledges and promises?

Meanwhile the Portuguese government must order a full PUBLIC review of this case, they must formally question Goncalo Amaral and Ricardo Paiva. It must be discovered for certain if Robert Murat had anything to do with Madeleine's disappearance, I say this not without reason, after reading extensively into what he and others have said about him in the Portuguese police files and how he changed his alibi a couple of times and the reports about his behaviour at the time were so bizarre they are alarming. There are also reports about the "odd" actions and behaviour of his mother, there does exist a strange fact within the Murat family, where close family members do not seem to know how they are related and there is this totally bizarre phenomena where in a small sleepy fishing village on the Algarve, several striking Robert Murat lookalikes reside and Robert Murat had an affair with the wife of one of his lookalikes, not only that he actually lived under the same roof as his lover and her former husband, Luis Antonio, who also worked as a pool-man at the Mark Warner Ocean Complex at the time Madeleine disappeared. From reading the files, the Murat part of this investigation was never really carried out properly and it is still unknown if Murat and Goncalo Amaral knew each other or knew of each other prior to Madeleine's disappearance. Amaral appears to have totally ignored the amount of mystery surrounding Robert Murat.

The Madeleine investigation was never updated, it was never reviewed properly and because of the ludicrous Portuguese secrecy rules, the investigation itself and the people who were supposed to be carrying out the investigating never knew what their own objectives were, they were never fully briefed, never even given a photo of Madeleine when they were supposed to be searching for her in the early days, in fact the only people h who had the photos printed up were her parents and it was Goncalo Amaral who decided to try and use this as some strange reason that they were covering up their daughter;s disappearance, apparently Goncalo Amaral the chief inspector s coordinator of the investigation did not want to have publicity, so everyone was working in the dark - literally! Amaral was the chief cause of why this this investigation totally lost its way. Goncalo Amaral made every single mistake under the sun that there was to make, yet we are expected to believe he was this "incredible" detective with all this wonderful experience while at the same time expected to believe that it is normal that he makes every single mistake there was to make? Sorry this does not wash, all these mistakes allowed Madeleine's abductors to get clean away and this whole case is enshrined by incompetence, secrecy, lies, leaks and smears trying to pin the blame of Madeleine's disappearance on her parents - why?

I am just an ordinary person, I did not expect to find myself in this position to keep lobbying the police and the government of both countries over the disappearance of this little girl, but now that I do find myself in this position I am not going to drop this until the truth comes out and those responsible are made to pay for what they have done, and above all Madeleine is found and returned to her parents.

To Goncalo Amaral

When I take a look at this investigation and scratch the surface and see all that just isn't right, it is unconscionable that while a child is still missing and her parents and family are still suffering, that we can just pass by on the other side and do nothing, so I will never do that. While I (and others) continue to keep this case and Madeleine high profile, the perpetrators who took Madeleine and those that know what happened to her, will never, ever be safe from detection, of this I promise you. One day Goncalo Amaral, your sins will find you out!

Rosie

'I know who took Madeleine McCann'

2010-09-08T10:43:00.000+01:00

Deathbed letter from paedophile suspect makes abduction clue claim

From a report dated 1st September 2010
A paedophile suspected of being involved in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann 'confessed' to knowing what happened to the little girl on his deathbed, it has been claimed.
Raymond Hewlett wrote to his estranged son denying he played a part in the three-year-old’s abduction, but claimed he knew she had been ‘stolen to order’ by a gypsy gang.
Cancer sufferer Hewlett, who has a record of raping and abducting children, had previously claimed to have seen the missing toddler twice before she vanished in 2007.

But he vowed only to reveal where he was the night she went missing if he was paid thousands of pounds.
Kate and Gerry McCann’s private detectives refused the request.
Today his son Wayne claimed to the Sun that the letter was delivered to him by a mystery man a week after he died in April.
Wayne, who has had no contact with his father for 20 years, claimed his father insisted he had nothing to do with Madeleine’s disappearance – but that he knew who did.
He said: ‘He said a very good gipsy friend he knew in Portugal had got drunk and “let it out” that he had stolen Maddie to order as part of a gang.

‘My dad said this gang had been operating for a long time and had snatched children before for couples who couldn’t have children of their own.
‘Maddie had been targeted. They took photos of children and send them to the people they were acting for. And they said Yes or No.’
Private detectives working for the McCanns are said to be ‘extremely interested’ in the claims and are preparing to interview Wayne.
Wayne, 40, says he burned the letter because it ‘unnerved’ him so much.

The Sun reported they learned of the existence of the note through another source and confirmed they had not been approached by Wayne originally.
Madeleine went missing from The Ocean Club Hotel in Praia da Luz in the Portuguese Algarve while her parents dined at a restaurant on the resort.
Hewlett was living with his family on a campsite an hour’s drive away at the time.

Source:
Daily Mail

It's Been a while!

2010-08-23T18:33:00.003+01:00

It has been over three months since this blog was updated, I purposefully have left it this long to see what happened. Over the years we have been told by people to ignore certain people and they will stop their despicable behaviour towards the McCanns and little Madeleine, anything is worth a try! So we tried it and sadly nothing changed, they did not stop their venom, their nastiness, which proves it is a psychological need of those people to reach out and hurt others. The fact that after over 3 years 3 months, these people are still spreading their malicious vile lies and innuendos speaks volumes, not about Kate and Gerry McCann or those that want to help and support them, but it says more about themselves and their need to spread lies and hurt to two people who only want to be left alone to find their child.
People Like Debbie Butler, Tony Bennett, Joana Morais and Amberslu*, Brenda Ryan, Vanessa Sluming, Grenville and Helene Green, Sharon Bradford, Sharon Lawrence, are just sub-humans, I doubt if Madeleine was found tomorrow that they would stop, the hate by now is ingrained in their mentally disturbed psyches and ignoring them does not make a scrap of difference, in fact their mental illnesses have worsened, which makes the needs for blogs and forums like this one to counteract their lies and disinformation all the more necessary.

BRITS LAUNCH "MADDIE" PROBE

2010-04-11T17:46:00.010+01:00

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/778905/Portugese-cops-slammed-for-gaping-holes-in-investigation.html

By Lucy Panton , 11/04/2010

BRITISH police are to launch a new probe into missing Madeleine McCann after massive failures were found in the Portuguese investigation.
Our top child protection cop Jim Gamble has completed a fresh look at the three-year-old investigation for the Home Office.
He told ministers there were huge holes in the original inquiry that need to be revisited if they want to "come close" to reaching UK standards.
It will come as a bitter pill for Portuguese investigators who have fended off criticism since Maddie disappeared in 2007

Portugese police left 'gaping' holes

But parents Kate and Gerry McCann, both 41 and both doctors, are "delighted" at the move.
Failures in the original investigation are said to be "so gaping" that British authorities feel it is their duty to look at it again.
This time police will review all the leads using technology and standards expected in a homicide or kidnap case in the UK.
Mr Gamble, head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre, found a basic failure to collate information and join up links that should have been made.
Telephone records were not properly analysed, missing early opportunities for leads.
And Kate and Gerry McCann were named as Arguidos, or formal suspects, by Portuguese police - something that the review says would not have happened if the probe had been carried out in the UK.
Mr Gamble found no evidence sufficient to make them suspects. His findings have now been formally submitted to the Home Office with recommendations to re-investigate.
The damning review has now set the Association of Chief Police Officers the difficult task of trying to decide who takes on the mammoth task. It is already predicted to be "an extremely costly" investigation that, even if done properly, will probably never be solved.

Damning: Jim Gamble

A source said: "It is something that has to be reviewed. It is only right that the McCanns are given the satisfaction that everything that could be done has been done. It now comes down to who is up to the job."
The Home Secretary Alan Johnson is expected to announce that the new probe will NOT be carried out by Leicestershire police, the McCanns' local force. The review has highlighted failures within their handling of the case and ruled them out of the review.
Instead ACPO are now asking around their top cops to see who could take on the very difficult and complex investigation.
The source added: "It will be extremely costly and sadly is unlikely to result in a positive outcome.
"As much as we would all like this to end with good news for the McCanns, the fact is there have been a lot of missed opportunities and no-one will ever be able to reclaim the time and evidence lost."
Two thousand pages of evidence released earlier claimed Portuguese detectives failed to follow up leads.
Home Secretary Alan Johnson ordered officials to examine the "feasibility" of British detectives having a fresh look at all the evidence back in March.
Kate and Gerry McCann, of Rothley, met Mr Johnson to plead for help in their search for their daughter who vanished aged three from a holiday apartment in Praia da Luz, Portugal.

2010-04-07T16:26:00.005+01:00

Human Rights lawyer Dr Marcos Aragao Correia has made and lodged the appeal against the decision not to send Goncalo Amaral to trial, for the alleged torture of Leandro Silva. The appeal was sent to the court last week. Because of this appeal, the decision of the judge of not sending Amaral to trial is suspended, and this means Amaral will *STILL BE AN ARGUIDO* for that criminal procedure. Dr Marcos aragao Correia has also decided not only to work for free - as he as always done until now concerning Leonor and Leandro, but he also paid all the judicial taxes for that appeal! Making a stark contrast to Goncalo Amaral, the disgraced former detective in the Madeleine McCann case, who has been finding many ways to make an obscene amount of money off of the back of an innocent missing Madeleine and buying up luxury apartments worth 600.000 euros allegedly in another persons name and driving around in a 60.000 euro Jaguar bought out of earnings made out of that child, by tormenting her parents with lies and defamation. Hopefully, the appeal when it is heard, will not be heard by the same judge and the 2nd judge will come to a different conclusion and send Goncalo Amaral for trial, where everyone knows he should go.

A n Open Letter To Goncalo Amaral from the human rights lawyer Dr Marcos Aragao Correia:

QUOTE:__________________________________________

To Mr "Beast" Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral:
　
Just a few words about your new, false and defaming complaint against me to the Portuguese Bar, because we know that you Mr "Beast" Gonçalo, and your "satanic" followers, use to read this website.
How can you even insinuate that you’re not a beast? Don’t you have mirrors in your luxury apartment?

For Jesus sake, don’t lie so much! We know that your horns can not be seen cause their are well hidden, but please don’t try to hide your apparent "bestiality"! It’s too much!
So, you say that you’re not a beast? Hypocrite you are!
Just remember,

- Perhaps The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to Madeleine, Kate and Gerry?
- Perhaos The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to Joana, Leonor and Leandro?
- Perhaps The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to Diana, Ana and José?
- Perhaps The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to all the children victims of violence, and their parents, by allegedly protecting the criminals involved on Joana and Madeleine kidnappings?
- Perhaps The horrors you’ve done and you’re still doing to all the good Portuguese and British citizens by incentivizing a fascist country and a fascist police based on fake criminal investigations using torture?
Is not enough?
So, do you still maintain you’re not a beast?
Of course you are, and me and my witnesses are just going to confirm that to the Bar.
And may I inform you that the appeal of Leandro to the superior Court of Évora is already done and delivered in the Court of Faro? Yes, it’s true, so don’t sing victory yet.
And by the way, even if the fascist regime continues to protect you, don’t worry: true Justice will always be done in the end! I’m not atheist neither a Satan follower! So, True Divine Justice will always win in the end! Do you want to wait to see? Maybe it will be too late then... So, here’s my advice to you: repent of all the evil you are, ask forgiveness to all these innocent children and their parents, and divulge the names of all the criminals involved in those monstrous crimes against them, and only then I’ll stop calling what you apparently are: a BEAST! A ferocious beast from the depths of Hell.

WE ARE WATCHING YOU.

UNQUOTE________________________________________

So Goncalo Amaral and his wife are preparing to move into a large luxury apartment costing €600.000 euros? This apartment is situated right in front of his existing apartment and has allegedly been purchased by Amaral registered in another person's name? Who's name is that Marcos? Could it be Sofia Amaral? Or another of his family, or a friend perhaps?

I understand too that he has a special parking place to park his luxury limousine €60.000 Jaguar motor car, which he is still driving around in?

All bought and paid for by missing abducted Madeleine McCann.

Shame on Goncalo Amaral and shame on those who help him to do this. When they do things like this, perhaps they should not complain about being called a "Beast"? That is mild, they could be called a lot worse! Like a vile pimp, living off immoral earnings by cashing in on an innocent child's disappearance! And now I understand that Paypal have unfrozen the account that Joana Morais and others set up, in which to persuade people to give money to Goncalo Amaral and meantime he has just purchased in secret a €600.000 luxury apartment? And he has Joana Morais taking pensions off of pensioners by getting them to make donations to a man living this lifestyle? How dishonest and corrupt is this? And have none of them any shame?And these people have the temerity to accuse the McCanns and the fund, even though that fund is open, honest and above board and is used solely to fund the search for Madeleine?Amaral, Joana Morais and the rest are just damned vile hypocrites!When is the Portuguese government and judiciary going to do something about this man? Portugal looks to be still a fascist police state and this man Goncalo Amaral, appears to be right in the thick of it. Is the Portuguese government and judiciary scared of Amaral? Scared that he may open his mouth and start incriminating them? I can only think this may be true, or else someone would have acted to stop this allegedly corrupt man in his tracks, he is ruining the reputation of Portugal, they have to be seen to do something about this man and pretty damned quick too!

*** Goncalo Amaral Aka "The Beast" *** Purchases €600.000 luxury apartment and registers it in another's name! *** Still Driving Around in his €60.000 luxury Jaguar Motor Car *** Yet Completely without morals and scruples takes money from pensioners to fund his lifestyle *** Joana Morais - Helps with this "Fund raising" to maintain the luxury lifestyle of Goncalo Amaral ***

DON'T GIVE MONEY TO GONCALO AMARAL HE IS RICH ENOUGH WITH "HIDDEN" WEALTH!

Oh Dear It Seems That Yesterday I Upset the "Right Wing" Apparatchik "Claudia79"

2010-03-21T12:44:00.006Z

Goncalo Amaral

She came out fighting in her defence of her fallen "hero" Goncalo Amaral! Claudia was in full apparatchick mode and wasted not a minute trying to shoot me down in flames, but in her haste, she forgot how much I know about her and her "hero" Goncalo Amaral.

They say "the truth hurts"!

This was taken from PFA yesterday via JATYK http://justathoughtyouknow.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=guests&action=display&thread=313&page=91

(Thanks To PFA and JATYK)

QUOTE:________________________

: Rosie sums up murat Vs Tanner.by dcb2 » Sun Mar 21, 2010 2:42 am "Claudia79 Today at 01:03amethyst wrote:The coordinator (Amaral) still nowhere to be seen does NOT interview her or even speak to her , even though we know he speaks fairly good English.----------does he?

Reply By Claudia 79

Mr Amaral certainly does not speak English. He has asked me for help translating some e-mails and other things so I am positive about that. And coordinators don't interview witnesses or suspects. They coordinate.

UNQUOTE:_________________________

"Number 1........ Dear Liar Claudia

You do not need to be a translator to understand that actually SPEAKING the language, is a far cry from writing it and understanding it and comprehending the written language. Should you not actually know this Claudia? Or do you really think that everyone (except you) is stupid?

Number 2........

When you see your "friend" again, tell him he ought to be very careful who he speaks to, I wouldn't want to make him paranoid but.......................

Number 3........

So now we have it from the horses sorry your mouth (same difference) What we said about you being a PJ plant on the Daily Express blog was absolutely true.

*********************

Claudia, the fact that when you were asked all these questions on the Daily Express blog, you LIED and LIED and LIED repeatedly. Which makes you nothing but a dirty LIAR who cannot be trusted, not then, not now and not ever.

Question that people should now ask you is why you LIED? They may not ask you Claudia, but I will, because I am not afraid of you, I hate LIARS, especially those that lie with the sole purpose of actually deceiving people who trusted you.

The people over here on blogs and forums like the former forum the 3 arguidos, who trusted you and offered you friendship and respect and you took that, and LIED back at them, right in their faces.

The fact that you came to that blog, (and other such places) knowing it was a national newspaper blog and read by many people in the UK and you were ("probably") PAID by Goncalo Amaral to spread his lies and misinformation, spread the leaks, the innuendos and to purposefully blacken the characters of two innocent people, now we know that you were a ("probably") fully PAID member of spreading DISINFORMATION. And your aim? What was your aim in all of this Claudia? Shall I tell your friends that you have been deceiving and LYING to all of them all of this time, or do you want to do it? Your aim and the aim of your right wing "friend" a coordinator of the right wing policia judiciaria, was to totally frustrate, hinder, hamper and utterly destroy the search for that innocent little child.

Tell us Claudia, (and be very careful to tell the truth now, because you have no idea what I know) please tell those people who trusted and respected you, why you blatantly lied to them and why you did NOT want Madeleine McCann found. Tell these people how a friend of mine and myself sent off an email to a certain person in Portugal, in the Policia Judiciaria one evening and before the morning broke, both you and your friend "Alsabella" knew of that email, knew of the content and were speaking of it on the Daily Express blog and laughing at parts of it. We have the email saved, we have the screenshots, don't bother to deny it and make yourself look an even bigger LIAR (If that is at all possible)! The offices it was sent to were closed for day, so how did you get hold of that email, read it and start work on it to destroy the content immediately? In fact why did you deem the content of that email so important that it you thought it warranted immediate attention and destruction? Could it be that this email hit very very close to the truth? It did, didn't it Claudia? Don't worry though, obviously we have not forgotten this email and your response to it and with what later transpired in 2009, it turns out we were probably banging very loudly on the door of the truth.

Thing is Claudia, how did you know this?

Why did you try and destroy two innocent people, what had they ever done to you? More, what did that poor little girl ever do to you, that you would allow yourself to be ("probably") PAID to destroy any chance of ever finding that child?

Remember that wooden parquet flooring that you and your friend swore was there? We told you repeatedly that it was NOT in that apartment, but for some reason both you and your former "friend" went into overdrive and went to great lengths to spread the totally false conception that there was this wooden flooring in apartment 5a, at the time we could not understand why you would do this, we realised it must have significance as we also realised very early on that everything you did on that blog (and others) had a reason and that purpose was usually to blacken the McCanns characters and destroy any hope of ever finding Madeleine, by persuading people to think that she was dead and that her parents concealed her body. In fact your "party" line was almost exactly the same as your "friend" Amaral's, just as he much later wrote in his book. The reason why it was so important to you and your friend "Alsabella" that everyone think that there was wooden flooring in that apartment, was because it was part of Amaral's "thesis" that Madeleine's blood was found seeped into the wooden block tiles. I remember when the first photos were released that clearly showed there were NO wooden tiles in apartment 5a, you and your "friend" went into almost hysterical overdrive, to say that there was wooden flooring and that the photos were wrong, taken in the wrong apartment etc etc, we were not wrong, there is NO wooden block flooring in apartment 5a, yet you and your "friend" done your ("probable") PAID job of spreading DISINFORMATION so well, that even to this very day some people still believe your lies and still think there are wooden tiles in that apartment that were found to have Madeleine's blood on them.

Here you still are Claudia, still to this very day defending your right wing "friend" Goncalo Amaral and telling your lies and spreading your disinformation. You even opened your blog "Proud of the PJ", so proud of them were you, that when an active PJ detective met with a mysterious "accident" and the poor man was murdered killed, you were so proud of the PJ that you did NOT even bother to give it a mention on your blog, not one single solitary line. Now I think that a person running a blog that names it "PROUD OF THE PJ" and does not give a mention to a serving PJ member's death, is a bit of an enigma, I wonder if others think this too? Don't worry that did not go unnoticed, we did point it out to you at the time, it is all a matter of record.

What are you Claudia? Part of some underground right wing movement that wants Portugal to return to the bad old days? Where right wing cops ruled the country and people were terrified of them? Was Madeleine taken for sale to top up the funds of your "Right Wing Movement"? Was Joana Cipriano taken to sell for the same reason? I wonder now how your friends and those that have hung on your every Right Wing word feel, knowing that you have been lying to them all this time and leading them to think things that were just not true? Will they ever believe a word you say anymore?

Goncalo Amaral, NEVER attended the scene of a serious crime unfolding on his patch, he preferred to stay drinking with his buddies. As a police chief inspector AND coordinator that was a very strange thing to do. As you point out Claudia, Amaral is paid to "COORDINATE" and he could not be bothered to even turn up to do his job.

He did NOT even bother to turn up the next day either, as you have told us you have Goncalo Amaral's ear (be careful Amaral has a thing about ears), well perhaps you could ask him, when was the first time that he attended the scene in Praia da Luz? Please ask him if the very first time he attended the scene was when he turned up with the TV company to make his "mockumentary " documentary? You know the DVD he made, where he sold the rights of his book of lies to the TV company for an undisclosed sum said to run into SIX FIGURES. Where he was filmed standing in the road outside doing that thing with his hands, that thing which all psychologists say points to the fact that the person doing this is telling bare faced lies. (Do you do that too Claudia?)

How can a person write a book filled with such information about the apartment, when he had up to that time NEVER even been inside it? How can a person write a book accusing two people of concealing the body of their beloved child when he has NEVER once met those people and never once spoken to them, DESPITE GONCALO AMARAL SPEAKING FAIRLY GOOD ENGLISH?

If Amaral wanted to get to the truth so desperately like he maintains, why did he NEVER speak to Mr Mrs McCann?

Why did Amaral FAIL to COORDINATE the search he was paid to COORDINATE?

Why does Amaral blame everyone else for his shortcomings and his failures?

And why does he ("probably") PAY people like you to come onto blogs and forums in the UK to spread these malevolent LIES?

By getting the truthful answers to these questions, we will be closer to discovering who took Madeleine McCann and why MUCH, MUCH CLOSER!

You are nothing but a LIAR Claudia, employed and paid by another LIAR.

You have been sussed!

Bye Bye time for you to disappear, (just like your "friend" Alsabella, when she was sussed.)

What did Madeleine McCann a small innocent little girl ever do to you?

What did Joana Cipriano ever do to you?

"I Clauidia" Beware The "Ides" of "May" - Karma Is Almost Upon You!'

GONCALO AMARAL DOES SPEAK FAIRLY GOOD ENGLISH "BETTER THAN MOST PEOPLE REALISE"

And that is a FACT!

The Strange Oddity That Is The Murat Vs Tanner Debacle!

2010-03-20T10:50:00.004Z

Robert Murat Sharing a Smoke With His Portuguese Police "Friends"

Isn't it a strange coincidence that Amaral appears as a witness FOR Robert Murat, at a time when he (Amaral) is being widely discredited? Isn't it strange, that if Antonio Cabrita, Amaral's lawyer's secretary had not been in contact with "swine flu" and this bizarrely lead to Antonio Cabrita being quarantined, (why?) giving him the excuse NOT to attend court and getting the whole hearing adjourned, the the Murat Vs Tanner oddity would have happened at another time when Amaral's hearing was INACTIVE.

Call me cynical, but Amaral obviously knew of the Murat hearing as he was going to appear as a witness, he knew the dates of the hearings, so he managed to get his own book ban hearing adjourned. As it is, this along with everything else that Amaral touches these days blew up in his face. I think Amaral is suffering with "reverse Midas touch"

How odd is this Murat vs Tanner thing?

It is patently absurd!

A brief run down....

A child is abducted from her bed.....
The PJ coordinator decides to stay drinking with his pals rather than attend the scene of a serious crime to actually do his job and "COORDINATE" it.
A witness who believes she may have seen something comes forward and reports what she has seen to the police.
The coordinator (Amaral) still nowhere to be seen does NOT interview her or even speak to her , even though we know he speaks fairly good English.
Some time later this witness is then taken to a van with blacked out windows and asked to observe Robert Murat walking along the street.
The coordinator, "coordinating" the investigation into a missing child, is still NOT present in this van (despite giving the impression to certain newspapers that he was)
The witness categorically states that Robert Murat was NOT the man she saw walking along with a child in his arms that night of Thursday May 3, 2007.
The witness then repeats this testament in her witness statement (where again the coordinator who was supposed to be "coordinating" was not in fact coordinating and was NOT present.
The said "coordinator then gets sacked from this investigation after five months of not coordinating it, (five months of NOT doing his job properly) five months during which he has not even bothered to speak to the parents of the missing child, (despite speaking fairly good English)
The non coordinating "coordinator" gets the sack for serious professional misconduct. He then takes early retirement from his non coordinating "coordinator's" position and has a grudge against the parents of a missing child.
The now sacked non coordinating "coordinator" decides to write a book, where he blatantly libels the other argudio in that investigation Robert Murat.
Robert Murat seemingly ignores the Portuguese press attempts to assassinate his character of which the non coordinating "coordinator" Goncalo Amaral was responsible for the lies and leaks that appeared in the press in Portugal and were the basis for the British press reports!
In 2008 Robert Murat successfully sues the British press for libel and defamation, while ignoring the the true source of the stories, coming from the non coordinating "coordinator" and the Portuguese press! (still with me?)
We then hear absolutely nothing from former arguido Robert Murat until 2010.
Murat was actually made an arguido (suspect) in Madeleine's disappearance under the instructions of (wait for it....) the non coordinating "coordinator" Goncalo Amaral himself.
Meanwhile the non coordinating "coordinator" Goncalo Amaral has landed himself in all kinds of bother, he has been convicted of a criminal offence, perverting the course of justice, concealing a torture, convicted of perjury and just plain lying all over the place.
Goncalo Amaral has been exposed as the main protagonist in other controversial investigations and now there appears to be some kind of link, "linking him in with Casa Pia". (Casa Pia is the Portuguese orphanage at the center of child pornography and abuse allegations embroiling many police, doctors and judiciary, politicians etc.)
Not only the above (there is much more still to emerge) but the non coordinating "coordinator", decided to make himself an obscene amount of money off of the back of an innocent missing child, who's investigation he did not bother to "coordinate" by accusing her parents of murdering her and concealing her body and writing this all down in a book!
This book which has now been banned and the ban upheld twice.
These are the self same parents Goncalo Amaral, despite being the non coordinating "coordinator" NEVER bothered to meet and talk to NOT one single time, despite him (Amaral the non coordinating "coordinator") speaking fairly good English!
However in the non coordinating "coordinator's" book, he also accuses outright one Robert Murat! Which Murat completely ignores and decides instead to accuse a witness who was only giving a statement to police, of saying that she saw him at the scene
Bizarre? Yes it certainly is! Even more bizarre when you realise the witness has never once accused Murat, in fact she said the man she saw was NOT him!
So now we are at this strange place of Murat after being silent for all this time, suddenly decides to register a case against a witness, who was only doing her civic duty and reporting to police what she saw, or she thought she saw!
Murat ignores the outright accusations of Amaral the non coordinating "coordinator".
Murat ignores all the other people that are in the official files as saying they thought him and his behaviour very odd.
Murat ignores all the other eye witnesses who have no axe to grind when they reported as seeing him outside the apartment where the child disappeared from.
Murat totally ignores a police sworn and signed statement of a person who maintains that he Murat, behaved oddly, by throwing things out of an upstairs window into the street below where he could have hurt or killed passers by, (including children) ignored that this witness said that Murat tried to have sex with animals, has killed animals and tried to rape his cousin.
Murat has totally ignored reports that he has changed his alibi several times (It is all there in the official files)

Yet bizarrely Murat files an intention to sue Jane Tanner for libel, because she said she did NOT see him that night.

Now you can call me cynical if you like but look at the timing. How convenient was it that this story emerge now right in the middle of the non coordinating "coordinator's" unsuccessful attempts to have the ban on his book overturned?

Amaral non coordinating "coordinator" knew of Murat's intention, he had to as he himself said he was called as a witness!

The non coordinating "coordinator", knew of the court dates set. The non coordinating "coordinator" has a grudge against the McCanns and their friends, he blames them for him losing his coordinating position despite never actually bothering to do his job and coordinate!Odd? More than just a little odd, this is the non story that will suddenly sprout legs and do "completely" for Amaral, like no other story has yet done for him completely.

The truth about Murat and Amaral will come out when Murat is questioned over why he decided to bring this action against Jane Tanner. *Mark my words*, do you honestly think that her legal team will allow this to slip through the net?

Who put Murat up to trying to prosecute Jane Tanner for simply being a witness and telling what she thought she saw?

Why did Murat ignore all those other appalling blemishes on his character, reported by other people and decide to prosecute JT for saying she did NOT see Murat? This is one "witness interference" that Amaral is going to wish he stayed well clear of.

Remember my words

"From little acorns, mighty oaks do grow"!

THE TURKEYS HAVE VOTED FOR CHRISTMAS!

2010-03-13T21:09:00.004Z

It had to happen the imbeciles have donned their turkey panto costumes, and voted for Christmas.
I hope they get what they deserve, I hope each of the people that wrote to the BBC website and threatened Kate McCann now realise that they have been reported to the police and of course the BBC will have also spoken to Forumotion.

I hope they now realise that their IPs will be checked and their ISPs will be contacted and informed and I hope they realise that they are all in danger of having their internet connections taken away.

They are wholly despicable vile creatures who feel so inferior that they try to make themselves feel better by attacking the parents of a missing abducted child!

Perhaps now this has happened the government will also act to stop these foul sub-humans from spreading their filth on the internet.

Their forums and blog are absolutely littered with libellous comments which defame Kate and Gerry and their family and friends, these too will now be close examined and too late to remove them, many of us have got the screenshots and so each of those members on those sites now need to be very worried because each and every one of the, is now in real danger of being prosecuted, not only for libel, but for threatening behaviour and that is Laffin Assasin, Photon, Autumn, just to name but a few.

I hope they are worried - I have it on good authority that they should be!

__QUOTE:____________________________________________

Thank you to Tony of Hounding of the McCanns
Just A Thought You Know
Chaos for bringing us this news.

BBC pulls forum after threats made to Kate McCannSaturday, 13 March 2010 18:52 Raiden Madeleine McCann .The BBC was forced to remove an on-line bulletin board after it was attacked and threats made against Kate McCann, the mother of missing Madeleine McCann.The Aled Jones bulletin board hosted on the BBC site was closed following a sustained attack from members who left messages of hatred and threats directed at Kate McCann this site can reveal. We spoke to a BBC insider from the technical department who confirmed the site was closed down because of "specific threats made towards the welfare of Mrs McCann by members".Madeleine was nearly four when she disappeared from a holiday apartment in the resort of Praia da Luz in May 2007 and remains missing.The insider speaking to us under the agreement of anonymity revealed that the decision was made to close down the bulletin board after it became clear that members of the site were using the site to target Kate McCann accusing her of killing her daughter Madeleine and concealing the crime along with husband Gerry McCann and the friends who were holidaying with them at the time.The attack was coordinated and carried out by members of Forumotion's Missing Madeleine site, a site that harbours extremists who are encouraged to attack and threaten Madeleine's parents in a shared belief that this will expose the truth regarding her disappearence.Brenda Ryan, the owner of the 3 Arguidos website who normally orchestrates such on-line attacks in the past was quick to condemn it saying "Do any of you realise how this could and probably will be played out in the press, Goncalo (the disgraced ex-cop who said Maddie is dead and who is being sued for libel and defamation by the McCanns) supporters force Celebrity to close his website due to continued hatred and harassment of the McCanns?"Our contact in the BBC declined to comment further due to BBC restrictions however they did confirm that the specific threats made against Kate's welfare would be dealt with by the appropriate authorities.Both Brenda Ryan and Susan Menez, owners of the 3 Arguidos and Missing Madeleine forums respectively declined to comment to us.Kate McCann will appear on the Aled Jones show on Sunday 14th March as scheduled.We will bring you further updates on this story as and when we can.

___UNQUOTE:_________________________________________________

GOING, GOING, "GONC"!

2010-03-07T08:17:00.009Z

If only a mere part of what I have read in the papers this week is true, then dear little Madeleine McCann and her distraught parents, never stood a chance against this man Goncalo Amaral aka "Gonc". For anyone reading this blog who doesn't know, Goncalo Amaral is the disgraced former Portuguese policia judiciaria coordinator, who was sacked from the Madeleine investigation after five months, for serious professional misconduct, he also lost his position as Portimao police chief and was designated a desk job. Amaral has since taken "voluntary" early retirement and now receives a hefty police pension.

If only the hour long coffee breaks and three hour long lunches taken by Amaral while he was supposed to be looking for a missing child, that we all thought were so scandalous where the only thing we had to worry about with this man, Goncalo Amaral!

Amaral currently has several criminal charges being brought against him for a variety of reasons, which range from the alleged torture of Leandro Silva, to deliberately breaking his country's strict secrecy laws. Amaral is also due to answer the charge of libel and defamation and deliberately hindering and impeding the search for missing Madeleine McCann, through a book that he has written. A book which has been banned from worldwide sale under an injunction, which Amaral has twice tried unsuccessfully to have lifted. In this book Amaral claims that Kate and Gerry McCann somehow were responsible for their daughter's death and that they for some bizarre reason, decided to hide the body, retrieve it some 25 days later, drive it around in a hire car under the gaze of the entire world's press, before magically finding yet another impenetrable hiding place, in a country the couple had only come to stay in for one week while taking a family vacation. Amaral and his now deceased friend Guilhermino Encarnacao, were the source of the leaking, the smearing and the character assassination of Kate and Gerry McCann in the Portuguese press. Goncalo Amaral also had the McCanns made arguidos (suspects) in their daughter's disappearance on DNA evidence that KNEW did NOT exist! This suggests that Amaral went to the Portuguese prosecutor and they both decided to lie and make the McCanns suspects, or that he lied to the prosecutor about the DNA evidence that never was, either is a very serious charge.

Goncalo Amaral was warned by John Lowe the head of the Birmingham FSS, that there was no conclusive evidence that Madeleine's body had ever been in the hire car BEFORE he made the McCanns arguidos, using this non evidence to do so. Add to this, that it took Amaral 5 months to come to do this and suddenly he went from keeping these parents hanging about, not informing them about the search for their daughter, having them met with a barrage of unfounded and unsubstantiated claims, a different one for every hour it seemed, updated virtually every hour, of every day in the Portuguese press and world's media and on newspaper websites accusing them of all kinds of heinous things, to having them told by Ricardo Paiva that they were due to be formally questioned by the PJ and having them wait for weeks knowing this. The McCanns not only distraught and traumatised over the abduction of their missing daughter, and not knowing where she was, or what was happening to her, and realising that the Portuguese police who were supposed to be searching for their daughter, had NOT been since day 3 of the investigation, so coming to terms with the fact that no one was searching for Madeleine, also had to endure this psychological torture, on a drip, drip effect each minute of each and every day for five months, at the hands of Goncalo Amaral and Guilhermino Encarnacao, through unsubstantiated leaks to the Portuguese press. Any lesser people would have got the hell out of Portugal, but no, the McCanns stayed and they stayed because they wanted to help the search for their daughter and they were willing to "take anything thrown at them" and to go through anything in order to help get their daughter back, so for weeks lived with this terrible psychological battering and waited to be questioned and then suddenly the questioning came, almost in indecent haste it came and four months down the line, they still had NOT met with Goncalo Amaral, the person charged with finding their daughter and to this day have never once met or spoken with him.

Gerry McCann was told they had evidence that his wife had harmed Madeleine and that he should confess, when Mr McCann asked to see the evidence he was refused, when Mr McCann asked what the evidence was he was not told, instead the officers waved a piece of paper in his face and screamed that they had the evidence here in their hands. Mr McCann said they could not have the evidence because he knew they were both innocent. The "evidence" being waved about on a piece of paper so threateningly in front of Mr McCann's face, turned out to be the NON evidence of the dogs, which had already been ruled as inconclusive and the DNA sample taken from the hire car hired 25 days AFTER Madeleine disappeared and the sample gathered from the car, some THREE months AFTER her disappearance when tested was found inconclusive and could have belonged to anyone of the McCann family, and in fact could have belonged to any one of a percentage of the population, including the person who carried out the tests on the sample in Birmingham, England.

Kate McCann was questioned by a detective that had previously been the family's liaison officer, one Ricardo Paiva. Paiva had previously assured Kate McCann that the PJ believed Madeleine was abducted and that the couple had nothing to do with her disappearance. It was Ricardo Paiva that broke the news prior to the formal questioning of the McCanns, that they were more than likely going to be made arguidos, it was Ricardo Paiva that witnessed the complete emotional breakdown of Kate McCann as this terrible news and what it meant to the search for their daughter began to sink in. It was Ricardo Paiva that at that time reassured Kate that he believed them and it was Ricardo Paiva that could not look Kate in the eye, when they attended for formal questioning, prior to being made arguidos. It was Ricardo Paiva that tried to plea bargain with Kate McCann, telling her that if she confessed, that she would serve two years in prison and that her husband would even be allowed to keep his job. It was Ricardo Paiva that put it about that Kate had refused to answer 48 questions. It was Ricardo Paiva and Goncalo Amaral that compiled those questions, questions that were specifically designed, if answered by Kate McCann to entrap her with the guilt for the disappearance of her daughter, this was why her Portuguese lawyer advised her not to answer those questions. If you read over those questions, some of them Kate McCann could not possibly have known the answer to. No 18 for instance: How were the authorities contacted and which police force was alerted? Apart from asking how the police were first contacted, how on earth was Kate McCann expected to know which police force was alerted? How would she know that the Portuguese police had at least 3 structures to their police, the PJ, the GNR and the PSP? The woman had never been to Portugal before and had only been on holiday in the country for a few days, what a completely stupid question, one designed so that she could NOT answer it. Number 22. Did you call Sky News? By this time the PJ knew very well that the McCanns did NOT call Sky News, Sky News had told them directly that they had NOT done this, so why ask this question? 26. Is it true that during the searches you remained seated on Maddie’s bed without moving? If Goncalo Amaral had bothered to attend the scene of this major crime unfolding on HIS patch, INSTEAD of electing to stay drinking with his friends and eating shrimp, he would have known the answer to this question. In fact this was completely untrue and so to was the lie stated in Amaral's book about the McCanns praying on the floor of Madeleine's room. But I would suggest that even if they did remain seated and unmoving on Madeleine's bed, why would this be deemed as wrong? To me it would suggest that they were deeply traumatised and needed help and pretty quickly!

So after this the McCanns were made arguidos as explained on NO evidence at all, had Goncalo Amaral waited a further 8 days, instead of wasting weeks and months and then in the end rushing to make them arguidos, had he waited, he would have been UNABLE to make the McCanns arguidos, because the law changed in Portugal and he would have had to supply evidence to make them suspects, evidence Amaral did NOT have! Having done this, Amaral then sought to blacken the McCanns characters still further, by accusing them of running back to the UK after being made arguidos. 1) Amaral NEGLECTING to say that they had delayed returning home because they knew they were to be formally questioned by the PJ and had been kept waiting for the questioning for several weeks. 2) Under the terms of their arguido, they were told they would be legally required to report back to Portugal if and when required to do so. If they failed to comply with this then they could be arrested by the UK police. 3) Kate was threatened during her questioning that if they stayed in Portugal, the Portuguese authorities may take the twins away from them and may place them in the Portuguese care system. (A care system that has the sex scandal of Casa Pia childrens home to its name, which is now lumbering its way through the Portuguese courts, maning government officials, local government officials, celebrities, doctors, the judicary and the judicial police too! Knowing this, why wouldn't the McCanns want to get their children out of that country and home to safety? They had already had lost one child to abduction and were being accused of murdering her, while the real criminals, the abductors were being allowed by Amaral to get away scot free!)

Now during one of Amaral's many court cases/trial his appeal to have the ban on his libellous book lifted, he presented as a witness for himself, no other than the currently serving PJ inspector, Ricardo Paiva! The same Ricardo Paiva that had stabbed Kate McCann in the back and blatantly lied to her! The same ricardo Paiva that was instrumental in Kate being made a suspect in her own daughter's disappearance and the same Ricardo Paiva that had promised Kate and Gerry McCann that the PJ were doing everything they could to find Madeleine, when in fact they were doing absolutely nothing but trying to find ways to pin the child's disappearance on them, the search that in all but name had ceased on DAY 3 after poor Madeleine disappeared.

Chief Inspector and coordinator Paulo Rebelo who had taken over when Amaral was sacked from the investgation had presented evidence to Portugal's atorney general and two prosecutors who had deemed that the case was to be shelved and that there was no evidence to say that the parents had harmed their child in any way, shape or form and had cleared the McCanns and removed their arguido status. It was also said that there was NO evidence to suggest that Madeleine had died, or was alive. Rebelo then handed the shelved investigation over to "Ricardo Paiva" who was suposed to oversee any information coming into the investigation and ask for the case to be re-opened if any new information became available.
Ricardo Paiva believes that Madeleine is dead. Ricardo Paiva is a very close friend of Goncalo Amaral, so close that he attends private functions at Amaral's home and he also attended Amaral's lavish 50th birthday party, complete with non stop flowing champagne and expensive fireworks and the finest food and cigars and wine, a birthday party where Amaral's wife lavished a several carat £10.000 studded diamond earring for her 50 year old husband's newly pierced ear! A birthday party where Ricardo Paiva was alleged to be among the "thugs" alleged to have been sent by Amaral, to harrass and threaten his former lover and her husband as they stood smoking a cigarette in the street watching the fireworks. Ricardo Paiva alleged to be among those that stood and watched while the couples lawyer was attacked and pulled through the open window of his car and where the husband of the Amaral's former lover was slapped and punched and physically abused. Where this couple have been threatened in their own home by Amaral, recorded on tape and can be listened to and the transcript available to read on this blog.

This is on and the same Ricardo Paiva that is supposed to be able to put all personal feelings to one side and be able to judge candidly whether any new information has come into the "sheleved" investigation, enough to take to Portuguese attorney general and request that the investigation be re-opened. Yet this man Chief Inspector Ricardo Paiva a close friend of sacked and now widely discredited Goncalo Amaral, appeared in court as a witness FOR Goncalo Amaral during his appeal hearing and while under cross examination from the McCanns libel lawyer, Dra Isabel Duarte he calmly proclaims under oath;

1) That he believe that Madeleine McCann was dead.

2) That when he was working on the Madeleine McCann case under his then boss Goncalo Amaral, that they had NO time to investigate any other theories, other than the parents were responsible for their daughter's disappearance, which of course meant that any information and sightings and clues to the girls whereabouts were NOT investigated.

3) That of course his former boss was not responsible for hindering the search for Madeleine as there was planety of information still coming into the investigation.

Lawyer Isabel Duarte then asks Ricardo Paiva who is still under oath, how can he possibly look for a live child, that he believes to be dead?

Paiva was then asked if all of this information was still coming into the investigation then what has happened to all of this information?

Paiva under oath was forced to answer, that he had been placing all the information that came into this investigation in a file.

On learning this, Isabel Duarte went to the PJ facility where this file was held and under the freedom of information act asked to view this "file". Imagine her shock and horror and later the McCanns shock and horror and disbelief to find that this "file" was several thousand pages big and it contained information deemed highly credible sent in by the McCanns private investigators and Leicestershire police, but was just shoved into this file and NOT actioned upon! Not only this, there are pages and pages of sightings containing children who bore more than a passing resemblance to Madeleine UNACTIONED. Then there are the 1000's pages of information that has come from people who have contacted the investgation believing they may hold vital information as to Madeleine's location. Most of the thousands of pages of information in this dossier, have NOT been investigated, people being spoken to who all sya they gave their information and expected to be contacted by the investgation team but had heard nothing further, it is shocking and it must be absolutely soul destroying for Madeleine and her parents, so imagine how they felt when they discovered that Ricardo Paiva had taken all of this information, placed it in his "file" most of it remaining uninvestigated and then marking the filr "NOT RELEVANT TO THE INVESTIGATION"! How would Ricardo Paiva know this if he had not looked at it, let alone investigated it? How would he know what was relevant and what wasn't if he had not looked at it?

How could Ricardo Paiva come to an unbiased decision if he believed that Madeleine was dead and that his friend Goncalo Amaral was right when on no evidence he had accused the child's father? How could Ricardo Paiva a currently serving police inspector, be deemed as unbiased when he has been in court backing up his best friend disgraced and sacked former PJ coordinator Goncalo Amaral's right to write libellous comments in his book? How can Ricardo Paiva be unbiased when he backs up his fried Goncalo Amaral's right to make an obscene amount of money off of the back of an innocent missing child that he had failed, by accusing her parents of killing her and hiding her body?

Paiva could not answer how he could use his judgement and come to the decision that the case should remain closed, if the information was not being investgated, if he Ricardo Paiva had not even been looking at the information coming in, let alone investigating it?

Image borrowed from Hounding of the McCanns, thank you Tony.
http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.com/

The revelations that have emerged this week have been nothing short of astonishing that individuals within a police force have apparently been given carte blanche to behave in any way they saw fit and seemingly not to care what happened to a small child who was abducted from Prai da Luz, Portugal May 3, 2007.
Officers have been allowed to get away with behaviour that could be easily be termed as a gross deriliction of duty and negligence in the extreme.
Former officers have been allowed to swan about Portugal, getting paid for writing books and selling the rights of the book to TV companies to make documentaries heavily slanted and biased which are based on the book written by Amaral, which accused the McCanns of killing thier daughter and hiding her body. Amaral has been allowed to spread his malevolent lies around the TV and radio studios of Portugal and Europe and in various newspapers, all the while cashing in on Madeleine's name. Amaral even tried to sell an interview with himself to Sky News for £80.000, fortunately Sky told Amaral they were not interested! But Portugal had been allowing this man to do this and get away with it, until Amaral started harming the search for little Madeleine so much and excrably harming the reputation of her parents so much so, that in the end the McCanns had no option but to use the courts to have him stopped. Remember these are people that have never been charged of any wrongdoing about anything in their entire lives, yet were being forced to suffer inexplicably like this at the hands of Goncalo Amaral, the man who blundered his way through the investigation. In fact amaral made every single mistake there was to make, so much so, that people have questioned that these mistakes were not accidental, but deliberate, in order to deliberately frustrate and impede the inquiry into Madeleine McCann's abduction!

Make you own mind up about this astonishing sequence of events, but also remember this below, it concerns the alleged torture of yet another person claiming that Goncalo Amaral is a violent thug and remember that Goncalo Amaral is already a proven liar and perjurer, what else could he be?

Leandro Silva alleges that Goncalo Amaral beat him so badly that he received injuries serious enough to warrant his admission to hospital for four days and then forced him to take one month off of his work to recover.
In May 2009, Goncalo Amaral was found guilty for his part in the proven torture of Mr Silva's partner, Leonor Cipriano. Perjury, lying and concealing evidence of a torture were among Amaral's convictions and his suspended prison sentence is currently under appeal. Mrs Cipriano was found guilty of the murder of her daughter Joana, who remains missing to this day. The case made legal history in Portugal, being the only murder trial to be held in the absence of a body. This was why a confession from the mother was vital, without her confession there could not have been a trial. It was later proven that Leonor Cipriano was indeed tortured into confessing to the murder, a confession made in the absence of her lawyer and a confession she has since retracted and has never repeated. There lies the first anomaly, under Portuguese law, her confession should have confirmed by her in court at her trial and it never was.
Many in Portugal, including top lawyers, judges and prosecutors maintain that her guilt was never proved beyond reasonable doubt and that the evidence used to convict Leonor Cipriano was at best vaguely circumstantial and at worse completely unsafe, in fact, one of the judges that presided over her trial insisted on going down on record as believing that Leonor is innocent and that she has been wrongly convicted. Since her conviction her sentence was reduced from 20 years to 16 years under appeal and her alleged torture under Goncalo Amaral and his men has been proven, this is nay other modern European country would be enough to see Leonor walk free from prison, her conviction ruled unsafe, or at the very least a retrial ordered, but her appeal against her conviction and subsequent sentence has been astonishingly been turned down, under the guise that no new evidence has come to light to warrant this. Apparently, in Portugal, the discovery of the fact that Leonor Cipriano was taken from her prison cell during the night, to the PJ facility, where a plastic bag was placed over her head and then she was forced to kneel on ashtrays and then beaten with a cardboard tube, punched and kicked and tortured for over 24 hours, while being forced to soil herself because she was not allowed to go to the bathroom, or have a drink of water and then while in a completely disorientated state of mind delerious with pain and dehydration with a build up of toxins in her blood, terrified and in terrible pain, was forced into confessing to murdering her own child, cutting the body up and feeding it to the pigs, (without a trace of evidence being found anywhere) is NOT deemed as new evidence, or reason to rule a mistrial or unsafe conviction! I would like to know what was behind this judge's decision and if this judge was indeed, one of the "many judge friends" that Goncalo Amaral announced to the world that he had, just a short time ago!

Ask yourselves if you have ever seen so much concerning one man and his "friends" in any other case/cases, in any other country in the world? Have you ever seen such events anywhere, where a man like this has been left free to go about his business? Ask yourself also and in all honesty, would you trust Goncalo Amaral. while you are asking yourselves, think of these photographs of the bruised and battered face and body of tortured and wrongly convicted Leonor Cipriano, yet another Goncalo Amaral "controversy"!

Why aren't the Portuguese police investigating Amaral who has even given false accounts in order to claim legal aid, where he omitted to state he owned a large house, in large grounds with a swimming pool amongst his assets?

Why are they not investigating Goncalo Amaral a former policeman and head of the drug squad where he was involved in yet another controversy? The case of Hugo, where the man was falsely accused and despite being able to provide many witnesses that testified he was in his wife's home town at a family function, Amaral made him go to court where the man was sent for trial in neighbouring Spain, and Hugo became so scared and so distraught that he attempted suicide while in jail, fortunately the Spanish judge dismissed all charges against him and gave him an unconditional discharge the victim of mistaken identity, his victim even said that he did not know of, or recognise Hugo. Yet Amaral forced this man to stand trial in Portugal and astonishingly he was sent to Spain for the Spanish to sort out. It later emerged that it suited amaral to have Hugo charged, because this helped to PROTECT drug traffickers, yet again Amaral was allowed to get away with what appears to be illegal activities.

To this day Goncalo Amaral is still free and still be allowed to swan about his country accusing innocent people of heinous crimes.

When are the Portuguese going to do something about him? It is extraordinary that this man has gone unchallenged up to now!

Amaral has even got a person by the name of Joana Morais acting as fund raiser for him, she surfs the net asking for donations into what she calls Amaral's defence fund. Meanwhile while she is taking money from pensioners who can least afford it, her hero Goncalo Amaral, is running around Portimao in a £60.000 luxry Jaguar motor car, paid for out of the money earned for hum by innocent missing Madeleine McCann! Paypal has recently suspended all donations into this account pending investigations into its alleged legality. In any case, amaral has plenty if money for his own defence without taking the money from pensioners, he could sell his Jaguar luxury limo for a start!

Now the British home secretary Alan Johnson is said to be trying to persuade Portugal to reopen the Madeleine McCann investigation and is also said to be trying to carry out a review of the case here in Britain.
If nothing is done about Amaral and this madness he has created, a major diplomatic incident is going to occur and yet despite this late time, the Portuguese government could still salavge some fo their reputation by taking some very simple steps and actions.

1) Arrest Amaral 2) make him a witness (under Portuguese law he will be forced to answer questions) 3) Ensure that Amaral is charged and held to account for his other misdemeanors. 3) Conduct a full review of the Madeleine McCann investigation 4) Re-open the Madeleine investigation 5) Hold a full open and independant inquiry into the whole business 6) On NO account let inspector Ricardo Paiva anywhere near the Madeleine investigation 7) Suspend Paiva from duty pending a full investigation into his conduct.

Having done this, the rest of the world would then see Portugal behaving like any other modern country and the damage done by Goncalo Amaral and lowlives who abducted Madeleine McCann, would then start to be repaired.

It is the only way, there is simply no other way open to Portugal at this late stage. Inaction and dithering, secrecy and denial has led Portugal to this point, to lead her out of it will take humility, respect for the law, transparency and accountability and Portugal can do this, in my opinion she simply has no other choice!

In any case whatever happens, Goncalo Amaral is "Going, Going, Gonc"!

JOANA MORAIS NO IDEA OF DEMOCRACY OR FREE SPEECH

2010-02-15T00:03:00.002Z

Joana Morais

You will find no dirt here, I do not take or make payment to anyone, my conscience is clear, how about yours?

I would never coerce a pensioner into giving up her small pension in order to fund a corrupt policeman's legal case, in his wish to write a book he had no business writing and to enable him to carry on living a lifestyle he clearly cannot afford without the input of money earned off of the back of a child he failed to find and who he failed on every single level.

Why should you ask for money from people who cannot afford it, to enable Goncalo to swan aound in his £40.000 Jaguar motor car? You have a strange idea of democracy Joana, democracy does not come with one "Carnation" revolution, democracy is more than turning up at a court house to shout at broken people and rudely thrust flowers in their faces in the hope of causing them still more pain and hurt, democracy is a long and hard fight, that we should never give up, but what you call democracy, and the type of democracy that you and your fat friend want, is NOT democracy, in fact it is the opposite and the enemy of democracy and free speech. Democracy and free speech is freedom to speak, freedom to write, freedom to criticise governments, freedom to speak as you find, but only freedom to speak and write the TRUTH, freedom of speech is NOT freedom to libel, persecute and vilify and write books presenting a "thesis" as the truth, when it is nothing but lies, born out of the most damaging duplicitous behaviour, purposefully thought up to avenge oneself, because oneself feels anger at losing his job! Or using the excuse of a threat to free speech and democracy as a way to get at people and falsely make them worry in order to carry on making money and covering ones own lies and ones own wrongdoings and tracks with still more lies. That Joana is the arc enemy of any democracy and free speech. What you and Goncalo Amaral are defending and fighting for the right for, is actually fascist (and look over my posts I NEVER not ever use the word fascist lightly) How Goncalo silenced the McCanns while peddling his lies is how history shows us people like Hitler controlled people, he brow beat them, brainwashed them and tortured and killed people and ruled them by fear, so please do not bandy the word fascist around like confetti, the way I have seen you doing on your blog, I take that as a grave insult and a total injustice to those who have truly suffered at the hands of a fascist dictator, very much like your own country. If you use the word fascist just to make your writings look powerful then you water down the meaning of that terrible, terrible word and when that word is watered down, which word steps up to take the place in order that we described the true enemy of democracy and free speech?
The McCanns are not the enemy of free speech, all they seek to do is to be allowed to search for their daughter in peace, without being falsely accused by a corrupt convicted ex policeman, is this really too much to ask?

Be careful Joana of the things you accuse others of, history has taught us some very harsh lessons in the past and will no doubt do again in the future.Both you and your "friend" Goncalo wrote things and when nothing happened to stop you, you both became bolder and bolder and you both wrote the most terrible things because you both thought you could get away with it. You both are guilty of serious crimes against democracy and free speech, you used lies, innuendos and half truths to fool people, to present things in such a way that they look true, when in fact they were nothing but the vicious meanderings of a slighted man and you who saw fit to back him. You are in some ways worse than your friend Goncalo Joana, because you know deep down in your soul that you are wrong, yet stubbornness, false pride and jingoism spurred you on. Be honest with yourself for the first time in 3 years Joana and admit that Madeleine has long gone from your arguments, that you barely even give her a thought these days, the reason why you are here in such a malevolent fashion is because you dislike intensely the McCanns, simply because you see them as bringing shame upon your country So you will back anyone and anything that personally attacks that couple and you ought to feel a deep sense of shame for that and for things that you have written about them, all the more because you know inside that the things you have allowed to be published on your blog are simply not true and are the result of hysterical spiteful minds, your own included.Goncalo Amaral knows what he has done, he knows how he has fooled his country-folk into believing events that are simply untrue, he has a different agenda to you Joana, yet you aid and abet him, when it all comes tumbling down like a pack of cards, where does that leave you and the rest of the vile spiteful people like you? Standing around outside draughty courthouses with a bunch of wilting "Red Carnations"?

Tuesday 12th January 2010 The Start Of The McCanns Legal Action Against Disgraced Former Portuguese Detective Goncalo Amaral

2010-01-13T12:56:00.005Z

Tuesday 12th January As Amaral Leaves the court after the first day of his trial

A BBC East Midlands Today Reporter Asks :.. "Mr Amaral are you hurting the McCanns"?

Goncalo Amaral replies:............ "No...F*CK The McCanns"!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaselector/check/england/realmedia/eastmidlandstoday/eastmidlandstoday?size=16x9&bgc=C0C0C0&nbram=1&bbram=1&nbwm=1&bbwm=1

This is the caliber of person that the misfortunate parents of missing Madeleine McCann had to organise the search for their daughter. Amaral showed himself in his true colours yesterday.

Yesterday morning Amaral started off the day showing his arrogance and contempt for the judge, contempt for the McCanns and contempt for the entire court by arriving late for proceedings on the very first day.

Yesterday afternoon Amaral showed more arrogance and more contempt for court and the judge by arriving 30 minutes late back from lunch. (Remember Amaral is quite partial to late liquid lunches!)

Yesterday afternoon Amaral demonstrated yet further contempt for the judge and for court, by falling asleep during court proceedings.

Things did not go well for Amaral, his witnesses failed to perform and far from going any way to proving his case, they actually disproved it further.

With this in mind, when court was adjourned for the day Amaral left the court and immediately using foul language verbally assaulted Mr Mrs McCann. "F*ck the McCanns" he said when asked a simple polite question. If it wasn't bad enough that many of Amaral's lies were exposed and ridiculed in court yesterday by his own witnesses, he emerged from court and very unprofessionally used foul language directed towards the parents of a missing girl, but he did this in English and Mr Amaral, has made much of the fact that he could not speak to Mr Mrs McCann when their daughter disappeared because he did not speak English! Well he had no trouble understand the rapidly speaking reporter and Amaral certainly had no difficulty understand English and returning that foul retort! Proving that once again Goncalo Amaral has been misleading the public and lying to them, of course he can speak English, we have always known he could, nice of him to prove this at last!

What about Madeleine McCann's right to free speech? What about Madeleine McCanns human rights? What about Madeleine McCann's right to be searched for? What about the McCanns right to expect a detective to do his job properly? What about the McCanns rights to not have salacious lies spread about them by a police officer who was failing on every count?

Mr Amaral has been whingeing and whining about his rights to "freedom of Speech", in fact everything in Mr Amaral's life is about him and how hard up he is and how hard done by he is.

Indeed everything that has gone wrong in Amaral's life is always the fault of someone else! Amaral never takes any responsibility for anything. It was the McCanns fault their child was abducted. It was the McCanns fault that he (Amaral) failed to do his job properly; It was the McCanns fault that he insulted the British police and got himself the sack; It was the McCanns fault that their salary is higher than his! It was the McCanns fault that he was passed over for promotion; It was the McCanns fault that he had to work; It was the McCanns fault they lived in a big house; It was the British media's fault; It was the British government's fault; It was Alipio Rbeiro's fault; It was Sofia's (Amaral's wife) fault that he (Amaral) had several affairs; It was Sofia's fault that he drove his police car while drunk with his own little girl in it; It was Sofia's fault that he threatened to hit her; It was Sofia's fault that he threatened to strangle her; It was Sofia's fault that he threatened her with death; It was Sofia's fault that one Christmas she was so scared for her daughter's welfare that she ran into a police station and reported her husband violence; It was DR Aragao's fault that he (Amaral) sent thugs out to assault him and pull him out of his car window; It was Mr Mrs Bras fault that he (Amaral) sen thugs out to beat and punch Mr Bras in his face; It was Dr Aragao and the couple's fault that they had to flee to the Public Security Police for protection; It was Dr Aragao and the Bras couple's fault that they had to make official complaints about Amaral; It was Mrs Ana Bras' fault that she felt the need to write to the attorney general, not once but TWICE pleading for him to help protect them from Amaral; It was someone else's fault that Amaral became a corrupt convicted criminal; It was someone else's fault that Amaral got himself into over half a million euros in debt; It was Leonor Cipriano's fault that Amaral allowed her to be tortured while in police custody; It was Leonor Cipriano's fault that she was forced to confess to murdering her own child by means of torture etc (it goes on and on and on)

Yes I suppose it is also someone else's fault that Amaral in his latest trouble (that someone else made for him of course) has so far produced a string of lacklustre witnesses that were somehow supposed to prove that what he had written in his book was the truth and therefor, he was allowed to write it and therefor, had not defamed Kate and Gerry McCann and had not committed libel.

It was definitely the prosecutor's fault that when pressed by Judge Rodrigues about if he thought Madeleine McCann was dead, the prosecutor replied "50 - 50" in other words he did not know, in other words what Amaral has written in his book is NOT true and cannot be proved to be true, so therefor saying that Madeleine had died in apartment 5a and that her parents concealed her body (for some bizarre reason) is definitely UNTRUE, do therefor when publishing this knowingly in a book and then travelling around the world saying this, Amaral is committing libel and he is defaming and harming the McCanns character and reputations.

It was Ricardo Paiva's fault when he said under oath that because of Amaral's thesis, there was no time to investigate other possibilities for Madeleine's disappearance. In other words Amaral was so obsessed in proving the McCanns harmed their daughter and concealed her body, there was no time left to actually search for the child!

Just before court was adjourned for lunch today, Moita Flores dropped his "mate" Amaral firmly in it, by calmly quoting that Amaral's book was only a hypothesis, it was NOT the absolute truth"! Nice one Mr Flores, glad we finally agree on something, if you can see that his book is not the absolute truth, then you can surely see that he should not be making such statements as: "Madeleine died in apartment 5a earlier and the parents hid her body" that is a libellous remark and this is what the McCanns want stopped, they want people like Amaral to stop telling lies about them. They gave him every opportunity to stop, he didn't so they had to have him stopped, I suppose this is their fault too Mr Amaral?

Moita Flores who testified for Amaral in court today aided a paedophile in getting off of his crimes and sick assaults on children! When he was a PJ detective he along with another PJ detective Dias Andre' saw the case of someone which held a large quantity of paedophilia, then suddenly they both testified and said that it just contained a speech! Both men retired early from the PJ with considerable wealth, people do not understand how Dias Andre' had so much money in order to sustain his lavish lifestyle!

Of course some people pretend to be in debt, to divert attention away from their wrongdoing, very clever. Some people have put all their money and property into the name of his relatives and wife.

The case Continues Today!

Madeleine McCann - McCanns Libel Trial - Goncalo Amaral

2010-01-12T13:31:00.003Z

What About MY Right To Free Speech Mr Amaral?

What About MY Right To Be Looked For And Found?

Violence, Corruption Lies and Beatings & Sexual Abuse of Children Can Portugal's Human Rights Record Get Any Worse?

2010-01-11T22:36:00.010Z

Moita Flores

With a libel trial for Goncalo Amaral due to start tomorrow Tuesday 12th January 2010 and the 2nd of his torture trials also scheduled to commence this week, can things look any bleaker for Goncalo Amaral?

Can things look any worse for Portugal?

In the 2nd of his torture trials Goncalo Amaral plans to call Moita Flores as a witness to testify in his favour.

The connection Moita Flores and another witness that Amaral intends to call 'Felicia Cabrita' are also linked to the Casa Pia child abuse case, which is also expected to resume this month.

Moita Flores who writes in the most sycophantic way about Goncalo Amaral, is already well known for the services of "cleaning" crimes for a high price.. How much is Goncalo Amaral paying Moita Flores to write like this in his book and to testify in his favour in court?

For example the case of Eurico de Melo whose briefcase containing compromising letters about his paedophile and homosexual activities was stolen. Dias André (Casa Pia Case) and Moita Flores were among the people who found the briefcase. When the current Casa Pia case blew up, Moita Flores rushed to write in Diário de Notícias that the briefcase belonged to Eng Sousa Gomes and only contained a speech.

Why write an article which wasn’t even inserted in the chronicle he had on DN? of course to protect his "client" Eurico de Melo!

The same names keep cropping up repeatedly in all of Portugal's high profile cases, from Michael Cook's case where he was found guilty on no evidence for the murder of Rachel Charles. Joana/Leonor Cipriano; Hugo; Casa Pia and Madeleine McCann.

How deeply does Portugal's corruption go?

There are huge question marks hanging over the head of Goncalo Amaral, right back to 2002 he was known to have financial problems.

Goncalo Amaral was head of the drug squad and he was passed over for promotion because apparently he did not have the necessary training sessions, this was despite that he had apparently just closed and brought to justice a large drug trafficking racket.

So why did this happen?

In the case of Hugo, he was accused of attempted murder by Amaral, this was said to have occurred to "protect" drug traffickers who were actually responsible for the attempted murder.

Then there is this in the Casa Pia trial and allegations, Dias André ( a "close" friend of Felicia Cabrita and PJ Inspector, made a sudden fortune, even buying a villa for 100 million escudos[€500 000].

His connection to the "official" drug trafficking within PJ and/or paedophile material blackmailing more than justify his current assets, both legal and clandestine, which currently largely surpasses the million of contos [1 conto=1000 escudos; €5 000 000]. He is also facing a process for extortion. Then there are the questionable assets of the "early retired" Dias Coelho but his again are lower than his boss’ Paulo Rebelo [several millions of euro] Rebelo is "Godson" of Laborinho Lúcio, Luís Neves Baptista, Ilídio Neves.

Some PJ and ex PJ are said to have hidden their money and purposefully run up debts to cover the fact they have been taking many millions of euros in bribes, to protect drug and CHILD traffickers and paedophiles.

Felicia Cabrita is said to have "gone out" with Dias Andre in his police car, apparently in Portugal "going out" usually means to have sex!

How deep is this corruption running and when is Portugal going to do the right thing and have Goncalo Amaral investigated?

"The network of "protection" in Portugal is enormous and extremely powerful. There are magistrates, ambassadors, police, politicians - (all of which are said to have procured children from Casa Pia). So it is extremely difficult to break this down. These people cover for each other, because if one is arrested, they all are arrested. They don't want anyone to know."

Just recently we have heard Goncalo Amaral being interviewed on TV, during this interview he is being asked about the McCanns and the way he is going to answer the charges of libel and defamation that have been brought against him by the couple and Amaral's reply was to deliberately mention that he knows many judges and they are all his friends.

What was Amaral doing here?

I believe he was intentionally trying to intimidate Kate and Gerry McCann, by inferring that the judge was his friend and now she has had time to look at the situation properly, she will rule in his favour at the libel trial due to recommence tomorrow.

Amaral has stated in his book that he believes the McCanns daughter died on May 3rd in their apartment and that the parents concealed the body several times. (No body has ever been found and the McCanns remain convinced their daughter is alive)

There is not proof at all that the McCanns harmed their child and this is what the Portuguese prosecutors have quoted in their 58 page report;

"Criticism of police investigation from the Portuguese legal system Portuguese prosecutors ridiculed detectives investigating Madeleine McCann's disappearance for uncovering "very little" conclusive evidence about the child's fate, the newly released files have revealed.The damning report, made public as part of the massive dossier of evidence assembled over more than 14 months, even compared local investigators unfavourably with Hercule Poirot and Sherlock Holmes. Written by public prosecutors in Portimao and dated July 21 – the day the case was officially shelved – the document said the investigation had not been able to find any proof which would allow "the formulation of any lucid, sensible, serious and honest conclusion" about the circumstances of the girl going missing. It continued: "This includes the most dramatic thing, ascertaining whether she is still alive or dead – which seems the most probable.""The investigators are fully conscious that their work is not exempt from imperfections. They worked with an enormous margin of error and they achieved very little in terms of conclusive results, especially about the fate of the unfortunate child."This is not, unfortunately, a detective novel, a crime scenario fit for the investigative efforts of a Sherlock Holmes or Hercule Poirot, guided by the illusion that the forces of law and justice can always re-establish order."The 58-page report written by public prosecutors Jose de Magalhaes e Menezes and Joao Melchior Gomes and is contained in the final volume of the files released to the media" (in August 2008)

Amaral says he bases his book on the police files, but his book was released BEFORE the files were released to the public and as he was sacked from the investigation and took early retirement from his job in April 2008 months before the files were released and before the prosecutors wrote their report, how can he possibly have based his book on the files?

As Amaral cannot produce a body and cannot produce new evidence (If he could he would be duty bound to have reported it to the police) and Portugal's own attorney general has written a 58 page report, much of it condemning the investigation that Amaral run, it is hard to see how he has any hope at all of winning this libel case, and if he does, then allegations of corruption are going to be rife, so rife I suspect that this matter will be raised in the European parliament.

Also two temporary injunctions of Amaral's books have been won and he has been banned from speaking about the case, or giving interviews, now this has been put in place by the same judge that is going to preside over this case and Amaral appears to be boasting that he has already had this judges ear and that she now understand more. If the decision goes Amaral's way, there will be a huge diplomatic incident between Portugal and the UK.

Amaral has committed libel and he has defamed the parents, this is indefensible, it will be interesting to see what happens.

Last month Amaral's legal team failed to turn up to defend him in court, his lawyer Antonio Cabrita cited "swine flu" in his secretary as a reason to have proceedings cancelled!

It will be interesting to see if Amaral tries again to delay these proceedings.

Can You Mention Human Rights, Portugal and Goncalo Amaral In the Same Breath?

2010-01-08T17:15:00.005Z

A Bruised and Battered Leonor Cipriano

After her Brush With Police Brutality

Goncalo Amaral says he has been an criminal investigator with the policia judiciaria (PJ) in Portugal for 30 years, it is hard to believe that in view of his recent conviction for concealing a torture then lying to cover it up, one realises that during his 30 years, this cannot be the only case where he has been suspect of beating a witness and forcing their confessions under duress, obviously he has done such a thing before.

In February 2009 allegations of ill treatment by Portugal's law enforcement officers were received by the UN Committee Against Torture. There are grave concerns about torture in Portuguese prisons and the excessive use of force, including the use of firearms reports Amnesty International.

For those of you who follow this blog and our forum http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/forum.htm you will have read mention of the disgraced former policia judiciaria coordinator, Goncalo Amaral, last May 2009, he received an 18 month suspended prison sentence for his part in covering up the torture of Leonor Cipriano. Leonor Cipriano was convicted of murdering her daughter in the most appalling way and hiding her body, she denies this and only confessed to the murder because she was tortured for two days without let up, many top lawyers and members of the judicial police and the judiciary, claim that Leonor was not given a fair trial and that her guilt was nowhere near proved beyond reasonable doubt and as such, she should be set free, read what a former PJ Chief Inspector Dr Barra da Costa Martins has to say here: http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/joana-leonor-cipriano-f29/dr-jose-barra-da-costa-martins-retired-former-chief-inspector-of-police-writes-about-the-cipriano-case-t2199.htm Dr Barra da Costa is now a much respected University Professor of Criminology and Criminal Psychology and instructor of criminal investigation.

Joana Cipriano who vanished from her home village, has never been found or seen since. Her mother and uncle made legal history in Portugal, when they went on trial accused of murdering Joana, with no body ever being found. Without a doubt, it looks like Leonor Cipriano is a victim of a horrendous miscarriage of justice.

"Medical reports and photographs of Leonor Cipriano recorded extensive injuries after two days in police custody in Faro. Police officials said that she fell down a flight of stairs in the police station; however the Institute of Forensic Medicine stated that her injuries were not consistent with such an incident and were more in keeping with an assault. Leonor Cipriano said that she was punched, kicked, had a plastic bag placed over head, and was forced to kneel on glass ashtrays during interrogations."

Leonor Cipriano failed to identify her attackers as she had a plastice bag over her head and could not see them, also withot a doubt the woman was in a very frail and terrified state in prison and is no doubt terrified of reprisals, should she identify her attackers, which are said to be Goncalo Amaral along with four of his lower ranking colleagues and now ex PJ inspectors Paulo Pereira Cristovao, Leonel Marques, Paulo Marques Bom and Antonio Cardoso.

These men the judge laughably let off on a technicality, because they refused to speak in the court and refused to recognise the process that took them to court. In other words they refused to recognise the process of law and order they had all sworn to uphold and they were blatantly allowed to get away with it.

This case will eventually end up at the European Court for Human Rights.

Goncalo Amaral the leading investigator in the Joana Cipriano investigation, is no stranger to controversy either, he has been involved in other miscarriages of justice, such as the case of Hugo (which can be read on this blog) and he was sacked from leading the hunt for missing Madeleine McCann and demoted from his position of police chief of Portimao. He has also been involved in accusations of brutality since he took "early retirement" from hs position in the PJ. A couple who live near hm claim to have been stalked by him, and threatened, he has also been accused of driving at speed around his neighbourhood while under the influence of alcohol. One person has reported that he was threatened with death by shooting and the lawyer of Leonor Cipriano was man handled and pulled through his car window, while sitting in the street outside a restaraunt watching Amaral's firework display, the husband of a former "friend" of Goncalo Amaral was also attacked and punched in the face, by thugs which came for Amaral's party. These incidents have all been officially reported to the police and police incident numbers issued, also two separate claims and appeals for help and prtotection from Goncalo Amaral, were made to the attorney general, as yet the attorney general has done nothing to help these people.

It seems there are many cases like this in Portugal. In another case Michael Cook was beaten and tortured for days, refused food and wated and was refused visits to the bathroom and then forced to attend court in clothes he was forced to soil during his torture at the hands of the PJ. Mr Cook also maintained that the soles of his feet were beaten and then he was hung upside down out of a window while being held by his ankles. Michael Cook was accused and convicted of the murder of Rachel Charles.

Both Leonor Cipriano and Michael Cook vehemently deny murder and maintain they were tortured.

Goncalo Amaral is also due to stand trial next week commencing on the 15th January 2010 for the alleged torture of Leandro Silva, the partner of Leonor Cipriano.

These allegations of torture are far too often and far too common and they are repeatedly swept under the carpet.

How can Portugal be a member of the European Union while allowing these appalling crimes of police brutality, torture and police and judicial corruption to go unpunished?

With such an atrocious record of human rights how come that Portugal was ever accepted into the EU in the first place, while other countries who have done much to clean up their act have been refused entry?

"The Court of Appeal in Lisbon ordered a retrial in the case of Albino Libânio, who was assaulted by prison officers in Lisbon Prison in 2003. The Court granted a request by Albino Libânio’s lawyers for the Portuguese state to be named as a defendant. The decision was made on the grounds that, as his injuries occurred while he was in the care of the prison system, the state should be held liable even if it was impossible to prove which prison officers were responsible for the attack. The original trial had recognized the injuries suffered by Albino Libânio but acquitted all seven prison officers of assault because of lack of evidence proving their responsibility. A new trial date had not been set at the end of the year. "

Here again we see this rank hypocrisy, the same rank hypocrisy and contradiction we saw in the Leonor Cipriano torture trial!

"On 11 November 2003, Albino Libanio inquired with a trainee prison officer for a second time about the delivery of a package of food that he was expecting, and in doing so apparently used "inappropriate" language. The trainee prison officer considered his attitude disrespectful and reported the incident to the prison officer in charge of that wing of the prison. Albino Libanio was placed in a cell known as the "waiting room" or "cell 80", which was used for the temporary placement of inmates in transit and as a cell for the separate detention of violent or vulnerable inmates. In the evening, the trainee officer took Albino Libanio to an area where agroup of 10 to 15 prison officers had aligned themselves in two rows. Albino Libanio was forced to walk between the rows, while the prison officers pushed, kicked and punched him. Another prison officer noticed the commotion and led the prisoner away. None of the prison officers reported the incident. It became known by chance - on the following day Albino Libanio received a visit and told his visitors about the beating. They informed his lawyer who reported the attack to the Prison Service andthe Public Prosecutor. On 5 July 2004, Amnesty International wrote to the Minister of Justice toexpress the organization's concerns about the case; to request informationabout the criminal and disciplinary investigations which have been opened and to urge her to take action on the organization's recommendations.

Violence Against Women and Girls in Portugal

The Portuguese Association of Victim Support received 16,832 complaints concerning domestic violence in 2008, including seven murders. This represented an increase over the 14,534 complaints of domestic violence received in 2007.
According to statistics compiled by the NGO Women’s Union, 48 people died as a result of domestic violence in the year to mid-November.

Amnesty International Report 2009 - Portugal

Allegations of torture and other ill-treatment and excessive use of force by law enforcement officials remained a concern. The prosecution of law enforcement officials implicated in two high-profile cases of torture and other ill-treatment proceeded slowly. Domestic violence continued to be a widespread problem, leading to numerous deaths.
Torture and other ill-treatment

Joana Morais Is Walking a Very Fine Line

2010-01-07T19:00:00.013Z

Joana Morais Her Soft Focus Conceals Her Cold Hard Lying Two Timing Heart!

Ms Morais is laughable, to the point that the very next thing we now expect from Joana Morais, is for the gloomy woman to find a way of blaming Kate and Gerry McCann for "swine flu" and the snowstorms now sweeping the UK. Ms Morais it seems is willing to do anything to try and save the moribund Goncalo Amaral, who must surely now be entering the terminal phase of any credibility he once had, and being befriended by Joana Morais has got to feel like the end is nigh.

Now this from Ms Morais's blog, I am wondering if the end is in sight, not only for Amaral, but for Morais and the likes of Morais, from what I have read of her, she has walked a very fine line, she has already been served with a D5 notice over Mark Hollingsworth, which predictably she has tried to blame on the McCanns like swine flu and the British snowstorms, however, she has been libelling the McCanns, Clarence Mitchell, David Payne and Brian Kennedy for a very long time and the screenshots have been saved, she has had this warning and yet this still has not stopped her. I have a feeling that Joana Morais has crossed that very fine line she has been walking. Her forum and blog are completely libellous and defamatory.
Look at this screenshot, this is typical of the kind of comment that passes for OK on her blog and forum, it is talking of eliminating Kate and Gerry McCann!

This appeared on her forum today and if she does not heed this warning, then when action comes to her doorstep, she will only have her idiotic self to blame! Reader beware though, this is a Joana Morais translation and as such, the details could very well have been "accidentally" mis-translated!

"Kate and Gerry McCann Threaten to Sue Bloggers 7 January 2010
Posted by Joana Morais

Maddie's parents want
to wipe-out Gonçalo AmaralA letter sent by the English couple's lawyers said
they will sue anyone who publishes on the Internet the totality or excerpts from
the former PJ inspector's bookKate and Gerry McCann want to delete from the
Internet all the traces of Gonçalo Amaral's book on the disappearance of their
daughter Maddie. As ascertained by 24 horas, the couple has instructed its
lawyers to subpoena all the bloggers who have published excerpts or the entire
work of the former inspector to remove such content from the Internet under the
penalty of being prosecuted in the courts.The notice was sent to the authors of
the blogs that are more focused on the "Maddie case" by the British law firm
Carter-Ruck, a letter which gives an account of the court order prohibiting the
sale of the book 'Maddie, The Truth of Lie'. In the letter that the 24 horas had
access, the McCann lawyers attached a copy of the decision made by the Civil
Court of Lisbon."The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the material
that you are publishing is grossly defamatory to our clients and to alert you
that you are on the verge of receiving a lawsuit" it can be read while, they
demand for the immediate withdrawal of all the content related to Gonçalo
Amaral's book.No Warnings for Portuguese BloggersContacted by 24 horas, Isabel
Duarte, the lawyer for the McCanns in Portugal, has assured that no notice of
this kind was sent to any Portuguese bloggers. [it's a lie: Gazeta Digital a
blog by a Portuguese freelance journalist received a letter from
Carter-Ruck]This is not the first time that the parents of British girl, who
disappeared in Praia da Luz in May 2007, try to silence the theories that
contradict the version of the abduction on the Internet. In September, Kate and
Gerry McCann ordered their lawyers to advance with legal proceedings against the
authors of sites and blogs that defend that Maddie is likely dead.in 24 Horas,
07.01.10, paper edition"

To say nothing of the fact that Morais has taken it upon herself to start a "Defense Fund" for Goncalo Amaral, she has been taking money from old age pensioners who desperately need their money to keep warm this winter and she has been surfing the internet persuading these people to pay their money into a bank account she has opened for Goncalo Amaral. Goncalo Amaral is the man who has made upwards of over 2 million euros out of the missing abducted child Madeleine McCann, he has made this money out accusing the parents of killing their daughter and concealing her body. He has openly accused them of this in a book he has written, libelling and defaming them making unsubstantiated comments, when he has not even met them, not even spoken to them once and neither has Joana Morais. This is the man Morais is collecting money from pensioners for, the man that tried to charge Sky News £80.000 for one single, one off interview, the man that charges newspapers, magazines, TV and radio stations thousands and thousands in return for giving them interviews, this is the man that sold the rights of his now banned defamatory book to a TV company to make a completely biased and libellous reconstruction. Goncalo Amaral leads these people through what he says happened to Madeleine, in the apartment, the car etc etc, in the apartment, where he NEVER stepped foot until at least three months AFTER Madeleine was taken (so how does he know what Kate and Gerry did?) Oh and that was THREE MONTHS after she disappeared that he decided to make that apartment a crime scene. This is the man that has spent his money on booze, cigars, women and holding lavish firework parties rather than pay up the half million euros debts he has run up. Joana Morais wants pensioners to fund this man's defense, but that isn't all, she is planning, she is planning this kind of money making enterprise to raise money for her "friend"! (not to mention the mugs and t shirts and other merchandise she plans on selling to raise money to give to that creep) Don't forget the man is also a corrupt and bent ex cop, found guilty of perverting the course of justice and perjury in a torture trial of a defenseless woman, not to mention either, his other torture trial coming up next week, close on the heels of the libel case!

Joana Morais will have you believe that she is some kind of free speech campaigner, don't believe a word of it, Joana Morais is a no campaigner for free speech, her kind of "free speech" is only free if she believes in it, if she doesn't, then she tries to get forums and blogs removed from the internet, so quite how she can comment on other people doing it is beyond understanding!

This is a communication she sent to a forum host, where she tried to get the forum removed from the internet, because she did not agree with what was being said, in actual fact it was not libellous it was the truth, so she failed!

What this below proves is that, Joana Morais is a complete hypocrite.

Free speech Joana? Don't make me laugh!

Joana Morais Writes To Forumotion Complaining and ask for the forum to be taken DOWN from the net!

This forum http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/ has defamatory content and is affecting the integrity of various persons, namely of a former coordinator of the Judiciary police, Mr. Gonçalo Amaral,(Who Is A Convicted criminal) about an English Lawyer Mr. Anthony Bennett, and about myself http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/goncalo-amaral-wife-f55/portuguese-petition-removed-t2090.htm#25528 . The forum administrators not only violate your terms of services but they have also published an illegally recorded phone call breaking thus various Privacy Rights and Laws in Europe in the UK and in the US.,(The Calls Were Not Recorded Illegally Under Portuguese Law Or Any Other Country's Laws) If just read a few pages you\\\'ll see how the main objective of the forum is to promote hatred, slander and abusive content regardless if they have any evidences of their claims, like in http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/goncalo-amaral-wife-f55/my-god-they-will-have-crooks-anywhere-in-portugal-t2088.htm where they are stating that serious respectable citizens are criminal offenders(I Reiterate, The Person In Question Could Hardly Be Called Respectable, He Is A Convicted Criminal Who Sleeps Around), further implying in an xenophobic manner that Portugal is full of corruption.(You Ms. Morais Are Saying Such, The Portuguese Posters On The Web Site In Question Are Not, And Find Your Statement Offensive And Have Informed The Forum Host Of Such) Please, I would like to see the forum removed from the internet, or the contents which are libellous and that break your ToS placed off line. I\\\' am willing to make a legal complain to a civil curt of law, along with several others who are being defamed by this forum administrators. Please, see to this matter. Thank you.screen-shot related to the illegal phone call with a download link

I wonder how Joana Morais thinks the forum could be harming the "integrity" of Goncalo Amaral? You have to have some integrity to have it harmed and Goncalo Amaral hasn't got any! If he did he would not be accepting money from old age pensioners!

WILL GONCALO AMARAL'S LEGAL TEAM BOTHER TO TURN UP TO DEFEND HIM THIS TIME?

2010-01-07T15:58:00.004Z

Antonio Cabrita (Left) Pierre Paulo Cristavao(Back) Sofia Amaral Goncalo Amaral (Right)

Will Antonio Cabrita, Goncalo Amaral's lawyer bother to turn up to represent him at his libel trial next week?

Antonio Cabrita failed to turn up on the date of the original hearing last month (December 2009), giving the hastily cobbled together excuse of the lawyer having to be quarantined because his secretary was thought to have "swine flu". A bit excessive, of course Cabrita did not have to be quarantined, this was just an excuse for Amaral to save face with the media. Cabrita did not have swine flu and his secretary was only thought to have it, no confirmation if it actually was the virus has been forthcoming! Cabrita could have easily attended the hearing, he obviously chose not to. Understanding this, we then have to ask why? Why did Cabrita not turn up to represent his client? Non payment of fees perhaps? A difference of opinions? Already there is talk of a rift between Goncalo Amaral and Antonio Cabrita, Amaral bizarrely announcing that he is going to train as a lawyer and the former lawyer of Leonor Cipriano, Joao Grade, is set to be his advocate! (Read blogs below for Amaral's chequered history with Joao Grade) Word has it that Cabrita and Amaral have fallen out over Amaral's intention to be trained by Joao Grade, whatever it is, it does ask a question, "does Portugal allow bent corrupt convicted criminal ex cops to become lawyers"? For Goncalo Amaral is certainly that!

What was also brushed under the carpet last month, not only did Amaral's lawyer not bother to show up at the hearing, it was touch and go if Amaral was going to bother to show up too! Apparently Amaral was not going to show up to be at the court, he changed his mind and attended when he learned that Kate and Gerry McCann were going to attend the first day of the hearing, even though they did not have to!

Word has it that Amaral's lawyer is trying to get out of turning up for next week's hearing too!

Of course the more cynical among us may think that all of Amaral's procrastination is because on the 15th January 2010, his criminal trial in the case of the torture of Leandro Silva is due to start and by getting this libel case delayed, it would either delay the torture trial, or cause the libel trial to be cancelled yet again.

You could say that it looks like Amaral is playing games with the court's time, not something that particularly enamours itself to judges!

I think Goncalo Amaral is a very worried man and so he ought to be, he has some serious questions to answer of his alleged brutality, he has serious questions to answer over the disappearance of Madeleine McCann and he has serious questions to answer over his libellous actions towards her parents and his obscene money making exploits.

Not only this, his wife is said to be suffering depression over her husbands bullying, infidelity, drinking, careless spending and womanising.

Mrs Amaral is said to be upset over her husband's involvement with Joana Morais. Of course no one is saying they are having an affair, but you cannot blame the woman for feeling threatened, not after what her husband has put her through over the past eight years and Ms Morais does have a bit of a reputation for being a "Tubby Chaser"! The doubly rotund Duarte Levy will testify to that! It is strange, why would Joana Morais decide to start a fighting fund for Amaral, when Amaral has enough of his own money to pay for it himself? When Amaral appeared at the court Morais was all over him like a rash, this was said to have started a huge row between Sofia and him, allegedly the shouting could be heard several blocks away! Why is it the Amaral's arguments always have to spill over into the street?

of course Sofia should not worry too much about Morais, if there is anything going on, Amaral will only be using her, just like he has used and abused every other female in his life, whatever else the man is, he certainly shows the traits of being a serious misogynistic pathological lying narcissist!

The Trial of Goncalo Amaral Due To Start Next Week

2010-01-06T14:40:00.007Z

Goncalo Amaral At His Book Launch

Appearing Terrified of Little Madeleine McCann I wonder Why?

The case is due to start next week of course depending on no one else suddenly needing to be quarantined because they have been in contact with swine flue!

Tony Bennett has of course been trying to jump on the band wagon, proclaiming that the Madeleine Foundation are going to be represented! You have to ask why they are to be represented, what part have they got in proceedings?

Apparently according to Tony Bennett:

"By contrast Dr Amaral will argue that the material in his book is factual information from the investigation, backed up by the thousands of pages of documents that have been released to the public already by the Portuguese Police. He will further contend that his conclusions about the likely fate of Madeleine McCann are reasonable conclusions that he was entitled to reach, based on the available evidence. "

If he does back his claims up by the thousands of pages of the files, he will also have to explain how he saw them before anyone else! Amaral was sacked from the Madeleine investigation after just five months, his tenure ended then.

Amaral's book was released on 24th July 2008...... the files were not released until 4th August 2008.....So how could Amaral base his book on the files?

In order to win this case Amaral must prove beyond reasonable doubt that what he is saying is the truth, if he cannot prove what he is saying and provide evidence of that proof, then what he has written in the book is lies and it is libellous and defamatory.

Amaral maintains that Madeleine died in apartment 5a on Thursday May 3rd 2007 and that her parents concealed her body.

If this is true, where is the body? Where was it concealed? Why hasn't it been found?

It is hard to see what Amaral can bring in his defense, he will no doubt use the "free speech" card, but as usual Amaral proves himself ignorant, free speech is not freedom to lie, and libel someone defaming them and destroying their good name and blackening their characters and without a doubt, this is what Amaral has done to Mr Mrs McCann, especially in Portugal.

In his book Goncalo Amaral writes "Maddie disappeared forever" how does he know this?

He has said that he suspected Kate and Gerry McCann because they failed to show any emotion at a press conference, but what he doesn't say is why he immediately contradicts his own words, by saying that on the evening Madeleine disappeared, Gerry threw himself on the floor begging the GNR to go out and launch a search for his daughter and that both Kate and Gerry McCann were so distraught that they were throwing themselves on the floor of Madeleine's bedroom, instead of reporting this accurately, Goncalo Amaral uses the couples distress and grief at their missing child to mock them, referring to them as "praying Arabs". Thus defaming their characters with his written words, this is libel, it is libellous because it is untrue, the couple were deeply distressed and indeed they were showing emotion, so what he is written is untrue - libel. Furthermore, how can Goncalo Amaral give a factual written report of this? He was NOT there, he was NOT at the scene, he did NOT see, nor did he speak to Kate and Gerry McCann, so anything he is saying about that night in his book, is not the truth, it is hearsay, he is writing and passing as truth what other people have told him.

I cannot see this case lasting very long, what Amaral has done is defame people, he was warned that if he continued legal action would be taken, but as time went on and it seemed like no action was forthcoming, Amaral became bolder and bolder, he started travelling around Europe promoting his book, promoting his unsubstantiated gossip and in so doing not only was he defaming two innocent people, he was actively harming the search for Madeleine, by making people believe she was dead, where there is no evidence to back this up, in fact
in the 58 Page Report written by Portuguese public prosecutors Jose’ de Magalhaes e Menezes and Joao Melchior Gomes, the prosecutors’ said:

Madeleine’s parents did not “act with intent” in leaving their children alone in their holiday apartment the night the child went missing. “They could not predict that in the resort they chose to spend their holidays they could place the life of any of their children in danger.” They also noted that: “We must also recognise that the parents are paying a heavy penalty — the disappearance of Madeleine — for their carelessness in monitoring and protecting their children. It said: “In reality, none of the suspicions which led to them being made arguidos came to be confirmed later.”

How is Goncalo Amaral going to defend what he has written in his book, when it is in direct contrast to the Portuguese Attorney General and two of Portugal's top prosecutors have written?

He cannot use the files, because the files were nowhere near released when he wrote his book, if if he does quote them, then how is he going to explain seeing them, when he was not even a police officer at the time and he certainly should not have been allowed anywhere near them?

Overriding this, because of his defamation of the parents, they can successfully argue that not only has he blackened their characters and destroyed their good name, thus greatly harming their reputation and standing as citizens and in their professions as doctors, Amaral has helped to convince the Portuguese public that Madeleine has died, probably at the hands of her parents and so the search for her has been harmed, as people are not likely to believe they have any information that could help.

It is hard to see how the temporary injunction that has now been been granted twice, will not now be held up as permanent.

Here Is A Picture Of a Demonstrator That Believes Kate and Gerry McCann harmed Their daughter. She was loudly demonstrating outside the courtroom, where last December, Goncalo Amaral's defense failed to turn up, citing they had to be quarantined because of "swine flu"!
There was a small group of loud demonstrators outside the court, this could provide prrof about how Goncalo Amaral has actually harmed the McCanns reputations.

Mad Shouting Woman

(Maybe Related To Going Going Gonc!)

Joao Grade Lawyer To Leonor Cipriano & The Goncalo Amaral Connection

2010-01-04T18:27:00.008Z

Dr Joao Grade dos Santos

Former Lawyer To Leonor Cipriano
Leonor Cipriano was convicted with her brother Joao Cipriano, of murdering Leonor's daughter and then disposing her body in the most macabre, spine chilling of ways. Leonor's lawyer was Dr Joao Grade dos Santos. Dr Grade received no financial recompense for representing Leonor and her brother, although legal aid was granted in their case. In Portugal if you are granted legal aid and need a lawyer to be paid out of that grant, the court actually appoints a lawyer, the defendant cannot choose a lawyer of their choice. Dr Marcos Aragao Correia, Leonor's present lawyer, also receives no financial recompense, he is expected to represent Leonor Cipriano for nothing. Leonor cannot pay him, she is very poor and has no money.

Leonor Cipriano Arriving At Court For Last Year's Trial
So weak, she Had to Be Helped Along By Two Prison Guards
~~~~~~~~~~~~

With so many miscarriages of justices occurring in Portugal, with the same story of people not being adequately represented, this is probably the reason why!

Dr Grade seemed to be doing a reasonable job of representing Leonor and then all of a sudden that changed, here we will attempt to understand the reasons why that suddenly changed.

In 2005, Leonor Cipriano, along with her brother, Joao, were found guilty of murdering eight-year old Joana Cipriano after she was reported missing in September 2004.

They were found guilty by a court of three judges and four jurors, they received prison sentences of 20 and 19 years respectively, since their sentences have been reduced on appeal to 16 years each.

In April 2008 Joao Grade was arrested as he prepared to visit two prisoners in Beja prison, after drugs were detected in two bags he maintains he was carrying in for the two inmates. Amphetamines equivalent to approximately 45 doses street value and also a quantity of ecstasy tablets.
On March 26th 2008, one month before Joao Grade was found to be carrying drugs in his possession, Goncalo Amaral along with four of his lower ranking colleagues PJ inspectors Paulo Pereira Cristovao, Leonel Marques, Paulo Marques Bom and Antonio Cardoso, were committed to jury trial by Joaquim da Cruz, an investigating judge. In May 2009, Goncalo Amaral was found guilty of falso testimunho (perjury) and given an 18 month suspended prison sentence.

Strangely in a country where they beat you up for traffic violations, Dr Grade made a plea to the court that he did not know the drugs were in his possession and the court accepted his plea, what a pity they did not extend the same kind of understanding towards Leonor Cipriano, where on no evidence at all, and nowhere near proved beyond a shadow of a doubt, that woman was convicted of the most heinous of crimes.

Where is the justice?

Where was her "lawyer" Dr Joao Grade?

Why did he not bring to the court's attention the many inconsistencies in the "alleged confession" obtained under torture, aided and abetted by disgraced former detective Goncalo Amaral?

Dr Grade, also said he was confident that he would be able to clear his clients once their appeal was heard, as he believed their guilt had not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Since the guilty verdict was announced, a number of Portugal's leading lawyers and judges have spoken out against the decision. One judge at Leonor's trial insisted on going on record as stating that he thinks Leonor Cipriano is innocent.

After a complaint to the DA was made by the Director of the Prison of Odemira, Dr Ana Maria Calado. Then soon after, Dr Marinho Pinto, who was at the time a journalist and now President of the Bar, made a front page report about Leonor’s torture in the newspaper "Expresso", which forced the investigation to go deeper.

With all of this to go on and the indictment of Amaral
Dr Grade still could not piece together a robust defense for his client, Leonor Cipriano, it was almost as if he was trying to defend Leonor with his hands tied behind his back.

It was alleged by Dr Ana maria Calado, that having been questioned for 48 hours, Leonor confessed only as the result of a serious and vicious assault.

Leonor Cipriano's Injuries After She Had been viciously and Brutally Beaten During her Torture in Police Custody.
The Torture Has Since Been Proved In court

This is the woman that Dr Joao grade was supposed to be representing in court.

Is this the same Dr Joao Grade dos Santos, that now holds Goncalo Amaral, an officer he helped to convict in high esteem? So high, that he has now become the disgraced former PJ coordinators advocate and plans to train the convicted criminal to be a lawyer?
Is this the same Dr Joao Grade dos Santos, that has now pledged to testify in favour of Goncalo Amaral at his forthcoming trial, where he will stand trial once again accused of torture, this time the torture of Leandro Silva, Leonor Cipriano's partner?
Is this the same Dr Joao Grade dos Santos, who attended the 50th birthday party of Goncalo Amaral and who dined with another member of the five former PJ inspectors he helped send for trial, Pierre Paulo Cristovoa? The simple answer to those questions is yes!

How can Dr Grade in all honesty testify in favour of Amaral at his trial where he stands accused of torturing another member of the family, he represented and helped to convict by getting them indicted?

How did Dr Joao Grade dos Santos manage to get off of the charge of drug smuggling in a country where they arrest you, take you into a room for questioning and then beat you to within an inch of your life, for even minor misdemeanors?

Strange business this lawyer thing, very strange!

Could it be that Dr Joao Grade dos Santos is in fear of his life and that of the safety of his family?

Until 1974 Portugal was a dictatorship, this was the climate in which the PJ was created and their methods were notoriously brutal.
In a country where brutal treatment of suspects was routine. The mother of one expatriate British woman had been arrested in the late 1980's on suspicion of a petty crime and she was savagely beaten while in custody, she was found to have extensive and deep bruising all over her body. Of course, the police said they hadn't done anything, and they were never called to account.

Leonor Cipriano dispensed the services of Dr Grade and employed the services of Dr Marcos Aragao Correia. Dr Correia has subsequently ran a successful trial in getting Goncalo Amaral convicted and having Goncalo Amaral charged with the torture of Leonor's partner, Leandro Silva.

Against this backdrop in Portugal, perhaps we should not be too surprised that the Lawyer that just successfully had five ex Portuguese detectives accused and charged with various serious crimes, ranging with torture and perjury, in the March of 2008, was himself "apparently" caught in possession of drugs as he "apparently" tried to smuggle them into a prison, just one month later in April 2008. Coincidence? Even the birthday party of Goncalo Amaral could not pass without incident!
Leonor's present lawyer and the former "friend" of Amaral and her husband, were aggressed in the street as they stood watching Amaral's firework party! (This is the party that Dr Joao Grade dos Santos also attended as a guest of Amaral's)
Dr Aragao Correia was pulled through his open car window and threatened, while the husband of Amaral's former "friend" was punched repeatedly in the face by people that came from the party, allegedly sent by Goncalo Amaral. The police were called and the incident reported and the three who were attacked, were given incident report numbers, also the Portimao attorney general was informed.

Yet Dr Grade is to testify in favour of Goncalo Amaral?

Strange? You bet!

The Vanished of the Invisible! How Madeleine McCann Has Highlighted Them!

2010-01-03T11:32:00.010Z

When Madeleine McCann was abducted from her bed on Thursday May 3rd 2007 in Praia da Luz, Portugal, no one thought that things would end up like this, some 2 years 8 months later, still waiting for news about her, still hoping she is well and refusing to give up on her. I doubt if any "ordinary" person could have possible envisaged what the abduction of one little girl could invoke. As time has passed, what on the face of it looked to be an abduction under slightly unusual circumstances, has grown into something major and it is highlighting a whole plethora of wrongs, both in Portugal and in the UK. If you believe in fate and believe in all things happen for a reason, then you may be forgiven for thinking that little Madeleine was taken to highlight some of the most terrible miscarriages of justice that have occurred and that are still occurring in Portugal. In fact remember that sentence, it could prove to be a lot more truthful than we may at first realise!

Who would have thought that the abduction of that little girl could flag up as many wrongs and "deep seated corruption" as it has? Because of that one little girl, the world now knows about; Rui Pedro; Rachel Charles; Renee Hassee; Joana Cipriano, the world knows that in the case of;

Rachel Charles tragic murder. Michael Cook was arrested and tortured and undoubtedly served time for something he did not do. (This blog has highlighted the plight of Michael Cook many times in the past and makes no apologies for doing so again) The amount of totally unfounded and unsubstantiated hearsay, that was allowed in the courtroom and then used to actually convict Michael Cook, was staggering, but when you realise that this kind of NON-evidence was also used to convict Leonor Cipriano of the murder of her daughter, it actually sends a chill down the spine. How many other times has this happened? Read about the case of Hugo, recently highlighted on this blog, remember the common denominator in the case of still missing Joana Cipriano; Leonor Cipriano; Hugo and Madeleine McCann and her parents, is the disgraced former police coordinator of the PJ in Portimao, Goncalo Amaral. For those of you who do not know, in May 2009 Goncalo Amaral was found guilty in court of concealing evidence of the torture of Leonor Cipriano and is now serving a laughable 18 month suspended prison sentence for that heinous of crimes. (Leonor was tortured over two days into confessing to the macabre murder of her own daughter - again highlighted on this blog many times).

Of course people who have lost their beloved children want justice, I cannot even begin to understand what they are going through, however, they need the correct justice though, they need to know that the *CORRECT* person has been been found guilty and incarcerated for their heinous crime. Justice for children actually killed by their own parents or by another family member must also be rigorously sought on behalf of the child. However, true and meaningful justice is not served at all when the wrong person is locked up or the wrong people are vilified and persecuted, not only because of the total injustice of the situation to all concerned, most of all the victims, but because this means that someone who can do something as unspeakable as this, is actually free to do it again!

The world now also knows about the kangaroo court trial of Leonor Cipriano. We know about the Portuguese state run children's home, Casa Pia. We know about the 6 year old little German boy Renee Hessee' on holiday with his parents, happily running along the beach with them one minute and inexplicably vanished the next! When his frantic parents reported this to the police, they were fobbed off and just coldly and inhumanely told that their child had probably drowned! Of course this is not true, if he had drowned in such circumstances then tragically, his little body would have been found and it never was, to this day he is still missing, to this day his parents like the McCanns, are going through all kinds of hell wondering what has happened to their child and no doubt waiting that wait and hoping against hope that their child will be found. I often wonder, if Renee's parents had been "lucky" enough and managed to get as much publicity for their child as the McCanns managed for Madeleine, would their name too have been dragged through the mire by now? Would they also have stood falsely accused? So little is known abut Renee', but how often is a child in full view of his parents one second and then disappeared for good the next, totally ignored by the Portuguese police? Did the German government, like the British government, hide behind protocol and red tape, saying they could not get involved as it was a Portuguese police matter, so nothing, NOTHING was done about a little boy lost? Just like Madeleine McCann?

Yes we now know all about these children and the wrongly accused, but one question we must ask and we must keep asking for there is very good reason to ask it; "of all the children and cases that we know about, how many is there that we do not know about?" Portugal has a street children problem, it has a problem with child prostitution, under circumstances like this, how many Portuguese children, or children of illegal immigrants, have vanished without trace, yet gone unreported? It is chilling and fills us with terror and dread, but to deny this very real problem, is to deny adequate protection for all children, especially those that no one knows are there in the first place.

Referring back to that sentence I highlighted earlier, could it possibly be that the reason Madeleine McCann was taken, was because some group somewhere wanted to highlight what was actually going on in Portugal? How many times have you heard (with very good reason) the disgruntled relatives of other missing children complaining that their child never received as much attention as Madeleine? That the only reason Madeleine was given so much publicity was because she was blonde, fair skinned and the daughter of middle class British parents? These pressure groups seemed to resent the McCanns because they managed to get media coverage for their daughter. Now I am not saying that Madeleine was taken to use as some kind of bargaining publicity chip and that it all went horribly wrong and people became terrified as the slow realisation of what they had done began to register with them. I do not actually think this, but none the less, it may be a reason, no matter how tenuous it is and it should be kept in mind. If this by some remote chance the reason why Madeleine was abducted, then the chances of Madeleine being found safe, well and very much alive, increase dramatically.

I believe that the Portuguese government has turned a blind eye to Madeleine McCann's abduction and some of the other cases before her, I also believe that the Portuguese government knows very well what is happening in the case of street children and the trade in underage prostitution and the trade in the disappearance of children of illegals. "The Vanished of the Invisible"! It knows, but does nothing, because it is simple economics and I believe that all governments everywhere have one thing in common they all weigh everything up in simple terms of economics.

For those that sit comfortable in the UK, the US or France, Spain or Germany, Belgium or Holland or anywhere in the modern world and think it cannot happen "here", think again! If children are not registered and they go missing 1) are their illegal immigrant parents going to report them as missing? 2) If the governments of such country's do not even know they are in the country, how is the system going to flag their disappearance up?

Non attendance at school is usually picked up by Educational Welfare Officers and non shows for immunisation programmes and child development clinics is usually a good indicator to there being a problem, but of course children of the "invisible" do not have this luxury of being tended and cared for, they are some of the ones that slip through the net!

Thinking about this makes me wonder how big and how widespread this problem may be across Europe and Eastern Europe? How big could this child trafficking problem actually be?

When I read how people on the Continent all take their children out to bars and restaurants with them and they all react with horror at the McCanns for leaving their children unattended, it is as if they are all walking around with a paper bag over their heads, they are so complacent, so ridiculously complacent, if they think that this never happens in their country because children are taken out with their parents. Stuff and complete and utter nonsense, it happens in their countries, it happens all the time, the difference between some countries, is that some countries do endeavour to keep some kind of record of child abductions, while some other countries are so anally retentive about the effect that this could have on their number one economy, the tourist industry, that they completely sweep it under the carpet. Some countries are so screwed up about democracy and freedom of speech that they are willing to go to any lengths to say they have it and protect it, not realising that keeping things like child abductions under the carpet and simply blaming the parents of the abducted child, is a bigger threat to their fledgling democracy, than almost anything they could think of in recent history.

Freedom of speech is not freedom to slander and defame the vulnerable.

I blame the Portuguese government for a lot, but I also blame my own government, the British government, for being spineless and for their inactivity and lack of insistence that something is done about the abduction of a British minor.

The British government could have insisted on liaising with the Portuguese government and when it quickly became obvious that the investigation into Madeleine's disappearance was not going well, the British government could have strongly suggested that in order to avoid the things apparent now from occurring, that a team from Scotland Yard be allowed to take over the investigation and the technology that Scotland Yard has for just this kind of case, (HLOMES) be put to use for the good of Madeleine, this in the end would have been worth the slight embarrassment to Portugal at the time and it would have saved the huge embarrassment they now endure. Alas the British government failed and in so doing they too failed Madeleine McCann and there is no escaping this fact.

Madeleine McCann is a British citizen, a minor and not only this the British government has a duty of care towards her, as Mrs Justice Ede made Madeleine a ward of court, this means that parental care was passed to the British government. So why hasn't the British government been doing all they could to find her?

Meanwhile the vanished of the invisible goes on in Portugal, just how many children who are unaccounted for have vanished in Portugal since Madeleine was abducted? How long will it be until the next "order" for a particular child goes out and another Madeleine case is born? If there are any inevitability's in life, sadly this has to be one of them. Meanwhile those that refuse to believe poor little Madeleine McCann was abducted, sleepwalk on like some kind of blinded zombies of the night, all repeating their mantra of free speech and worshipping at the Temple of Goncalo Amaral. However, "False idols" will fall, they always, always do, without exception!

Where Is The Justice? Where Is The Fairness? Where Is The Equality?

2010-01-02T09:28:00.005Z

Dr Marcos Aragao Correia

A Principled Man

Lawyer of The People

and

Human Rights Lawyer

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I learned something over the past few days, something that has deeply angered me.

Dr Marcos Aragao Correia, has been working for free! All this time he has been representing Leonor Cipriano, he has not received one cent in fees, not one single penny or cent for legal services rendered. This is all very noble, but how does he live? How does he fund his considerable expenses?

The answer to this question is - Himself!

What a contrast the kind caring, charitable and principled Dr Marcos Aragao Correia is, against the grubby money grabbing Goncalo Amaral. This the man that thought nothing of trading on a missing child's name and image.
It has to understood that Leonor's former lawyer Joao Grade, also worked for free, receiving no payment for his "services". For reasons better known to Joao Grade who started out well, he suddenly started to fail to adequately represent Leonor Cipriano, he let her down in badly court, I suspect he has his reasons and maybe we should not judge him too quickly, none the less, he did let Leonor down, unfortunately this fact is indisputable.

Leonor Cipriano is a very poor uneducated person she was wholly dependant on Grade getting the truth out, her case which we have covered extensively on this blog and on our forum;

http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/forum.htm

The case of Leonor Cipriano appears to be a huge miscarriage of justice, involving the disgraced ex PJ coordinator and convicted criminal Goncalo Amaral. (Amaral was the detective who was sacked from the Madeleine McCann investigation after five months of total mess and failure, leaks and smears.)

~~~~~~~~~~~

Dr Aragao Correia took over Leonor's case from a poorly performing Dr Joao Grade, her former lawyer.

Goncalo Amaral, The Tubby Money Chaser
Wearing His Expensive Designer Suit
(Paid For By Still Missing Abducted Madeleine McCann)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Goncalo Amaral managed to make a lot of money out of writing books about Madeleine's disappearance, he was heavily in debt, but he had enough money to pay those debts, he did not preferring to waste it on expensive cars, drinking and holding parties.

Over the years he has been the recipient of a lot of money, but has still managed to land himself with huge debts and huge tax bills. Now the same way he had money during the past years and he has not paid his debts, he has money now and does not pay his debts.

If this is not bad enough, because of his alleged libel and slandering of the McCanns and because they are charging him with wrecking the search for their daughter, they are suing Amaral for £1 million and his assets have been frozen pending this court case, this is directly down to him, but he is applying for legal aid and has been moaning about not having the money to counter sue the McCanns, so the likes of Joana Morais has for some reasons decided to raise money by opening an appeal for his defense, they are actually taking money out of the purses of pensioners for this man, who has been the recipient of a lot of money. He must have got through hundreds of thousands over the past few years, yet he is now pleading poverty.

I am advised that in Portugal if you are granted legal aid you can pay for the court costs out of this, but if you need the services of a solicitor, then the court will appoint one for you and of course the chances are that Leonor Cipriano has been so badly treated up until now that they would appoint a completely different lawyer. So rather than give Leonor that worry and rather than jeopardise her case, Marcos does NOT get paid.

Why can't the Portuguese court allow Leonor legal aid and allow her to retain the services of her solicitor, who she knows and trusts and who has done so much for her?

I will be keeping an eye on Goncalo Amaral's application for legal aid, if he is granted it, it will be an absolute disgrace, but if he is granted legal aid, I wonder who will be appointed his lawyer? I hope they are going to treat Goncalo Amaral in the same way they are treating Leonor and Marcos!

Incidentally, Marcos also represents Leandro Silva for free too.

Why is there so much wrong with the legal system in Portugal?

Goncalo Amaral & the Clothes The Sniffer Dogs Reacted To!

2010-01-01T19:02:00.007Z

Goncalo Amaral and his Wife Sofia Leal.

Sofia looks Worried Doesn't She?

She may have every right to look worried too, I almost feel sorry for her, she probably didn't sign up for this when she married him, but she got it anyway. She could absolve herself if she only plucked up enough courage to speak the truth, before it is too late. She owes this philandering, spendthrift womanising drunk and corrupt ex cop nothing.

While Christabel was doing some research for the forum, she came up with this startling piece of information, we think it is so important that everyone should know about it. What we cannot understand, is why all those "Amaral supporters" that say they have read Amaral's book and call themselves "truth" seekers, have not mentioned this before, not a peep, why is that? Why hasn't Amaral's "friend" the "Tubby Chasing" Joana Morais mentioned this? Perhaps she thought it may harm her chances of collecting more money to swell Amaral's coffers? Whatever it is, these people have demonstrated that they do not really want the truth, they do not want Madeleine found, they do not want the real truth of what really happened to Madeleine McCann to emerge, in fact they led by their false "God" Goncalo Amaral, want the truth concealed, because as each day passes the truth, the "real" truth, is looking more and more awful and its net of incrimination is being cast far and wide. We believe Madeleine McCann is alive, being held against her will and more, we believe there is at least one high profile person who knows exactly where she is and who took her. Now the official investigation may not be able to say this, they may not even think it, but we can say it and we certainly think it.
hris for spotting this and if you would like to read further on this subject please go to our forum http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/exposing-the-lies-of-truth-of-goncalo-amaral-s-book-of-fantasy-a-video-coverage-f56/exposing-the-lies-of-truth-of-goncalo-amaral-s-book-of-fantasy-a-video-coverage-t2239.htm

On the above link you can view a collection of videos and pick up a sense of what actually happened.

The Sniffer Dogs and The Clothes

Quote from Goncalo Amaral:

QUOTE:_________________________________________________________

"The soft toy and all the clothes from the house are placed into boxes specially made to preserve evidence. These objects are then conveyed to the decontaminated premises. They are placed on the ground, a good distance apart for the dogs to examine. At 8pm, Tavares de Almeida calls me to let me know that Mark Harrison requires another place because this one is not sufficiently clean.- How do I find a place at this kind of time?- Sort it out! Julio Barroso offers us the new sports hall in Lagos which, finally, meets the required standards. The objects are once again laid out on the ground and the dogs can start. Eddie alerts us to a strong cadaver odour on some of Kate's clothes, but the CSI dog doesn't detect the slightest trace of blood."

UNQUOTE______________________________________________________

Where do we start on this? Is this what Amaral loosely refers to as "evidence"?

Amaral actually presided over the clothes all being transported in a box to the first venue, they were all then laid out on the dirty floor awaiting inspection from the British sniffer dogs, Eddie and Keela and their handler Martin Grime.

The clothes were taken and handled and put into the box.

The clothes were then handled taken out of the box.

The clothes were all laid out on a filthy floor.

NOT ALL of the clothes were packed inside these "special" cartons, some came in a suit case, some came in a holdall.

Why is Amaral giving the false impression that all the clothes were packed inside these specially held "evidence" boxes?

Why didn't Mark Harrison mention this in his report? If he did I did not read it. Where was the first place these clothes were laid out and contaminated? Who could have been walking all over the floor? What could have been dropped on the floor? Why were the clothes laid directly on the floor in both venues?

Why didn't the forensic science team conduct this test in a controlled scientific environment?

The clothes were laid out on the gym floor, a place where people sweat and dribble profusely, does sweat contain the chemicals putrescine and cadaverine? Saliva certainly does!

The dog alerts to what Amaral assumes to be cadaverine, how does he know what the dog is alerting to? How does he know it is a strong scent? Can he speak dog?

Amaral cannot assume this, it is not evidence, it is hearsay, conjecture nothing more than that!

Martin Grime refuses to divulge how these dogs are trained, but they are trained with pig meat. perhaps they are also trained with the use of saliva?

How come the dog only alerts to Kate's clothes and red T shirt that belongs to Sean and Madeleine's brother has been pictured wearing?

The clothes came out of the same box, if it was a strong odour of cadaverine as Amaral has suggested, why didn't this contaminate all the other clothes in that box?

Why has no reaction been recorded on Gerry's clothes, when Amaral has accused Gerry of getting the body and taking it one place to another 25 days AFTER Madeline disappeared in a car hired 25 days AFTER Madeleine disappeared.

Is this what Goncalo Amaral the bent corrupt criminal ex copper laughingly refers to as evidence?

I wonder when the shackles will eventually fall from the eyes of the very few remaining followers of this convicted criminal Goncalo Amaral? It is unbelievable that anyone can believe anything he says? he has repeatedly been prove to be a pathological liar! From cheating on his wife and children (two wives) right through to his former police work, just a complete tissue of lies, an utter fabrication. Poor Madeleine, what did she do to deserve this?

The Controversies of Goncalo Amaral Continue - The Case Of Hugo

2010-01-01T16:42:00.005Z

Goncalo Amaral and His Wife and Lawyer Outside The Court After He Had Been Found Guilty of Concealing Evidence of Torture. behind Him Pierre Paulo Cristovao, another Controversial figure, who is awaiting to hear if the appeal against his acquittal for the torture of Leonor Cipriano is accepted or dismissed!

Hugo is a young man living in Olivais, Lisboa. In October/2005 he received a letter from an Ayamonte court, it was directly addressed to him and did not come through the police or another court! It was accusing him of an attempted homicide back in August/2003. He went to a PSP (Public Safety Police) precinct in Lisbon, where he was sent to the PJ (policia judiciaria), and having got there, they told him to go back home and not to worry about the case. One year later, because he did not attend the court in Spain, he got the visit of PJ inspectors with an arrest warrant. He was so scared, he attempted suicide while in custody/prison that night. The next morning he was presented to a judge who confirmed that he was accused of being co-author of an attempted homicide along with two other people, one of them a former colleague that although lived in the same neighbourhood he had not seen since he left school, this person had already presented himself to the police already implicating himself in the crime. Hugo proclaimed innocence immediately and was able to present a staggering 15 witnesses, as he had been in Mondim de Basto, (his wife's place of birth) at the time of the homicide and said he never had set foot in Spain.

He and his wife were unemployed and had two little children and very poor and totally unable to defend himself.

Dr Barra da Costa Martins former Chief Inspector of the PJ now University Professor of Criminology and Criminal Psychology heard about the case and found a lawyer for Hugo, working pro bono (Free). The Portuguese court did not care to clarify if there was a case of mistaken identity, they didn't even bother to interrogate the other arguido. The same happened with the Supreme Court, on appeal. Basically, the case came back to the Relation (first instance) Court who refused to hear expert witnesses opinions and forensic exams on some photo of grainy video "evidence" that the PJ presented. The court concluded it was it was Hugo by just looking at the video with the 'naked eye'. Hugo's defense lawyer Almado wanted to bring expert witnesses, who could give their expert opinions on facial recognition.

While this case was being investigated by the PJ, the PJ coordinator was one Goncalo Amaral (again) it was up to him to make the diligences and have the video examined to see if this person was Hugo, Goncalo Amaral FAILED to do this and just presented this sloppy "evidence" to the court and the court just accepted it. The "co-author" completely denied Hugo's involvement in the attempted murder and under cross-examination in court he said he named Hugo because he was being *PRESSED* to do so, by the investigating officer *Goncalo Amaral*. A New appeal was heard in Portugal with the same result, a European mandate was issued and Hugo arrested at his home. December 2007, in court in Ayamonte, the victim of the attempted homicide did not recognise Hugo at all, yet Hugo was extradited to Spain to stand trial for attempted murder.

Hugo had 15 witnesses that put him in another place entirely.

Hugo did NOT resemble he person on a very grainy video footage which was presented in court by Goncalo Amaral as proof of Hugo's involvement.

Goncalo Amaral refused to get facial recognition expert to examine the footage of the video.

Goncalo Amaral refused to allow the forensic examination of the video.

Goncalo Amaral refused to believe 15 eye witnesses that placed Hugo in his wife's birth place at the time of the crime.

Goncalo Amaral *PRESSED* (or tortured?) the alleged co-author of Hugo into identifying his accomplice as Hugo.

His alleged "co-author" later testified in court under oath that he had been pressed into giving this statement.

The victim of the crime did NOT recognise or identify Hugo as being his assailant.

Fortunately the story finally ended for Hugo in a court in Huelva, Spain, the defendant was acquitted and cleared of all suspicion, when the Spanish court kicked it out.

It appears that the court in Spain wanted the video footage of Hugo to have it forensically examined and for facial recognition experts to examine it, but the Portuguese coordinator one Goncalo Amaral FAILED to send the video in time and many suspected him of "concealing evidence" that could have cleared Hugo in a Portuguese court, but it has to be said that the Portuguese courts were lax in their duty to their citizen too. Goncalo Amaral has since been convicted of concealing evidence of torture in the case of Leonor Cipriano, he received an 18 month suspended prison sentence.

"As Dr Barra da Costa puts it, 'In Portugal, there are far too many Hugos and Joanas. In Portugal there has been a long time since we last had a Gordon Brown, honour to him, capable of publicly risking his capital as statesman, that of the party and of Her Majesty in favour of his own nationals'."

Hugo was wrongly charged and it has been alleged that Hugo was deliberately falsely charged in order to protect "drug traffickers"! Hugo and his family suffered tremendously as a direct result of Goncalo Amaral and his "shoddy and dubious" police work. Of course Goncalo Amaral was at that time in charge of the drug squad!

The result is that if the Portuguese court had the photographic expert findings along with the co-defendant stating again that Hugo had nothing to do with this, and the victims themselves had also not recognised Hugo.

How many times is Goncalo Amaral going to be allowed to get away with this kind of thing?

And now we have him attempting to become a lawyer and being trained by the ex lawyer of Leonor Cipriano, a lawyer that attends Amaral's private functions. A lawyer who was himself caught in possession of class A drugs trying to smuggle them into a prison and who mysteriously was allowed to get off of this charge!

Mysterious that a lawyer who knew he would be searched, attempted drug smuggling and mysterious that he got away with such a serious crime.

Mysterious too that at the time he was representing Leonor Cipriano. Now call me a cynic and tell me that I may have been watching too many movies, but could the story be that drugs were planted on the lawyer, the lawyer was then forced to a dreadful job representing Leonor Cipriano in court, in return for him being cleared of smuggling drugs?

Leonor Cipriano was needed to be found guilty of murdering her daughter to cover up what really happened to her and why? Her uncle being hooked on hard drugs and would do anything for money to buy drugs.

The connection again being made to drugs and who is involved again? Goncalo Amaral.

What is happening in Portugal? How many times is something like this going to happen and the real culprits of murder, drug trafficking and child abduction be protected? how far are the police involved in all of this?

Goncalo Amaral *MUST* be investigated and interrogated, he may know who took Madeleine McCann!

Just To Inform You

2010-01-01T14:18:00.009Z

We are going to change the format of the blog a little, not too much, but in view of the news that will be coming in 2010, we have to move quickly with it.

Comments on this blog have never been necessarily part of it as we only seek to inform, however, they are always welcome and in addition to posting and commenting if you have something in particular you want to say, you can always contact us by emailing us directly at; j4madeleinemccann@live.co.uk if there is something you want to say but cannot say it openly, we will always pass on the message to the correct people as a matter of urgency. (if you cannot use the link to outlook express, just copy and paste the email address and send the email as you would normally email anyone.)

...................................

................................

Remember please feel free to contact us with any information you have, use us a third party, we do not mind in the least.

Never be scared, we can help you get your message across.

Together we can help Madeleine be reunited with her parents and family.

What Does The Body Language of Goncalo Amaral reveal?

2009-12-26T09:49:00.012Z

Goncalo Amaral

Making Barriers?

(Goncalo Amaral da Sousa)
Disgraced Former Portuguese Detective
Corrupt Convicted Criminal
................

A Brief Synopsis of The Man and His Former Career

What is there to be said about a man like this?
What words can you find and use to adequately portray the character of a person that has abused the power invested in him and abused the trust that has been placed in him?
Why did this man ever become a policeman, if it were not to uphold the law and to protect and defend the vulnerable?
Did he deliberately set out on this course, or did he become corrupt along the way?

There are questions, huge questions, over his colossal debts going back as far as 2002.
In a country like Portugal where there is so much distrust of those in power, where there remains a deep seated fear of the "right wing" police, what did this man give to his former profession?
Just a brief Google of his past reveals that virtually everything he has been involved in appears to have become tainted in controversy.

Amaral was passed over for promotion and was demoted from his position as police chief of Portimao, at the same time he was also sacked from the Madeleine McCann investigation after attacking the British police through a Portuguese newspaper and accusing them of doing the McCanns bidding, this was the official reason given for this most dramatic of ends to a police career. Obviously this wasn't the whole reason, there was undoubtedly a culmination of reasons why he was all but sacked from his job.

Do we believe that the reason was just because he decided to have a pop at the British police? Or was this the last straw and he was seen as a danger or a loose cannon who had to be removed before he brought down the whole house of cards?

If that particular house came tumbling down, then there was a danger that the in the rubble, other bigger fish in that dirty pond would be found and exposed.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

(Click on Picture to Enlarge)

Joana and Leonor Cipriano

.........
Goncalo Amaral was also made an arguido (a suspect) in the case of torture of the mother of another child who disappeared in Portugal, yet astonishingly, he was not suspended from duty while investigations took place, he was allowed to carry on working. Madeleine disappeared just 7 miles from where the other child 'Joana Cipriano' went missing and Goncalo Amaral was allowed to head the Madeleine investigation, despite being under a criminal investigattion at the time and a suspect into the "confession" (now proved) gained under the torture of Joana's mother Leonor, into confessing to the murder of her own daughter.
In short, the almost 4 year old Madeleine McCann's life and safe return, was entrusted to this man called Goncalo Amaral da Sousa, a man under a serious criminal investigation.

Please note that Goncalo Amaral has since been found guilty of perjury and perverting the course of justice in the now proven torture of Leonor Cipriano, a torture which took place in a police station with five members of the PJ present.

There is now a campaign to have Leonor Cipriano's conviction overturned, at the very least her conviction always looked like a complete miscarriage of justice, however, since the criminal conviction of the police inspector in charge of the Joana Cipriano case, it now looks like she is being kept in prison, purely because to allow her out, to overturn her conviction, would cause Portugal too much embarrassment on the international stage and this the powers thatbe in Portugal can do without, especially in light of the appalling treatment that was meted out to the parents of missing, abducted Madeleine McCann, by the same man that was found guilty of concealing evidence of a torture in the Leonor Cipriano case - one Goncalo Amaral.

Madeleine McCann Abducted From Her bed in Praia da Luz May 3rd 2007

..................................
When the news of Madeleine's disappearance reached Goncalo Amaral, he admits he was out drinking with his pals in a bar and got the call that Madeleine was missing, feared abducted from her bed on the evening of Thursday May 3rd 2007 in Praia da Luz, the Algarve, Portugal. While drinking in that bar with his friends Amaral made the very first of what was later to become known as a catalogue of the most ghastly, incompetent and heartbreaking errors, that without a doubt contributed to Madeleine's continued disappearance.
When Goncalo Amaral received the first call to inform him that a major crime was beginning to unfold on his patch, 'he' who was the 'police chief coordinator' of the Portimao Policia Judiciaria (PJ), decided that this was not important enough to take him away from his drinking session with his pals.
Of course at first no-one knew if Madeleine had been abducted or had simply awoken and wandered off, but none the less a tiny little girl was missing on Amaral's patch, she was in a foreign land, even if she was lost, she of course would not be able to make herself understood, she was heartbreakingly vulnerable and needed adult help, her parents were vulnerable too, in a foreign land unable to speak the language, so unable to correctly convey their fears and what they thought had happened and because of the language barrier, many misunderstandings would arise, this is understandable enough, no-one expected the local GNR or PJ to understand and speak English and vice versa, this was yet another reason for Amaral to attend the scene and take control and quickly and efficiently, put in place official translators and anyone within the PJ who could speak English, yet, Goncalo Amaral da Sousa, Police chief coordinator of Portimao, comprehensively failed to give Madeleine and her parents that help, in fact he failed to give his own team that help.

Even a rookie cop would have known to do this and would have made the urgent decision to suspect abduction, and put the recognised procedures for abduction quickly into place.

There is a recognised procedure for a child going missing in Europe:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Council of Europe recommends that its members should run a national missing persons' bureau. There are basically 4 levels of criteria that need to be met (1) The child is apparently under the age of 18-yrs-old; (2) There is reasonable belief that the child has been kidnapped or abducted; (3) There is reasonable belief that the child is in imminent danger of serious harm or death; (4) There is sufficient information available to enable the public to assist the police in locating the child.

If Amaral had attended the scene he should have quickly assessed it, immediately gathered all the Tapas friends and waiters and waitresses and spoken with witnesses and perhaps Jane Tanner's account would have been acted upon immediately.

All the criteria to reasonably suspect abduction would have been easily met and a full scale operation put into place.

Goncalo Amaral failed to do this and he failed in his duty of care towards one little girl, vulnerable and missing on his patch.

As a direct consequence of the police chief inspector co coordinator's actions (or more aptly named INactions), the much talked about "Golden Hours" were inexplicably and inexcusably lost in the case of the abduction of Madeleine McCann.

*Goncalo Amaral FAILED in his duty*

*He failed to act and those precious "Golden Hours" were lost*

*At the time of Madeleine's disappearance, Goncalo Amaral should NOT have been on duty, he should have been SUSPENDED from duty, pending the results of the criminal investigations, that eventually saw him convicted and given a suspended prison sentence*

In any other European country, Amaral's inability and questionable record would have raised questions immediately and I think I can say undoubtedly, that this man Amaral, who should NEVER have been put in charge of the Madeleine McCann case in the first place, would have been quickly removed and a more capable person installed to take control of the investigation.

Had this been done, then the outcome for Madeleine and her parents may have been entirely different.

Then to most logical thinking people's horror, Amaral was to begin making excuses to blame the parents for his own incompetence (Or blind eye turning) immediately. Amaral made much of saying the initial reasons he suspected Kate and Gerry McCann of being complicit was because of their "lack of emotion", they appeared cold, he said. Later he bizarrely declared that "he was told" that Gerry McCann was acting like a praying Arab, by falling on his knees begging the Portuguese police to look for his daughter! If we are to believe Amaral then this one statement is in direct contrast to what he wanted the public to believe of the parents! See the difficulty? See the contradiction by this man? If throwing yourself to your knees and crying and begging the police in a foreign country to look for your missing child is not an emotional and desperate act of a distraught and terrified father, what exactly is? Gerry was not being understood by the Portuguese police who could not speak English, so he did what he could to relate his and Kate's fear and beg them on his knees.

The unease about this man Goncalo Amaral began to set in with me at this point, but still my heart did not want to believe what my head was saying. I understood that perhaps the police in Portugal felt out of their depth and that they were catapulted into a situation that was beyond their capabilities, this being so and understood, why then did Goncalo Amaral decline the offer of help from Scotland Yard, who of course were better able and better equipped to deal with this escalating situation?

Apart from a couple of officers accepted by the Portuguese police probably for public relations reasons, all offers of help and for the more experienced British police to take over the investigation were refused.

Was this nationalistic pride getting in the way of a favourable outcome for Madeleine and her family? Or was it something more sinister?

Of the police officers that were flown to Portugal to help the investigation, did they allow themselves to be compromised by the investigating officer in charge- Goncalo Amaral? Was it a language barrier? Did they too fail to adhere to their basic training of keeping an open mind and then blindly follow Amaral down this dead end of an investigation, dead ended right from its very outset?

Perhaps questions need to be asked of the British police as well as the Portuguese police at this point? Or did the British police suggestions fall on deaf ears and be totally ignored?

On the "whim" of Goncalo Amaral, many people, both police and general public alike appear to have been totally ignored and their reports of what they have seen and eye witness accounts of a possible suspect seen hanging around outside apartment 5a, have also been totally ignored and in some cases "binned" and information totally lost to the investigation. The only information to have come in from the public and be logged, is information that would totally confuse the investigation, information from "others" that has come to light since Madeleine's abduction, which may have cast light on a possible abductor[s], has been ignored and inexplicably lost to the investigation.

..........................

The Portuguese attorney general shelved the investigation and stated there was nothing to implicate the parents in the disappearance of their own child. There was nothing of which to charge them with negligence and the AG also stated just as there was nothing to indicate that Madeleine McCann was still alive, there was certainly nothing to indicate that she had died. Goncalo Amaral seems to completely misquote his attorney general in his book, which he wrote and where he consistently points the finger of suspicion at Kate and Gerry McCann, this book and £1 million of Amaral assets, made solely from the name of Madeleine McCann, have been arrested and his book and other money making pursuits related to Madeleine injuncted, until the outcome of a court case brought by the Kate and Gerry McCann for libel and defamation of character is known. Amaral has made himself very rich since the disappearance of Madeleine and also drives around in a Jaguar motor car worth over £40.000 also bought out of the proceeds of his failed investigation into Madeleine's disappearance.

Public Inquiry

.................

Many would say that what is undeniably needed in this case to help clear up the mess and subterfuge which seems to have been created mainly by Goncalo Amaral, is an independent, full and open public inquiry into the handling of this investigation by Goncalo Amaral and then subsequently Paulo Rebelo, however, the chances of the Portuguese government ordering this, are nil.

The Portuguese government seem to be more focused on the harm this may do to
Portugal’s tourist industry which is worth over £2.8 billion to their economy, the majority of this revenue is coming from British tourists.

Looking back on the whole fiasco and total farce which was the investigation of Madeleine's disappearance, it is not an exaggeration to say that every mistake that could be made, was made and when you take into consideration that Goncalo Amaral was supposed to be an "experienced" detective with 30 years service under his belt, one has to ask the question; "how come a man of his experience, made all those errors"? Some so basic, a rookie first day policeman would not have made.

Recently Moita Flores a little respected "criminal psychologist" and an associate of Goncalo Amaral's, has claimed his stake to his piece of the fame to be gained by jumping on the high profile band wagon of Madeleine McCann's disappearance. His reasons given for backing his "friend" Goncalo Amaral's events and "libellous" publications etc are perhaps even more bizarre, Flores actually quotes Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson, Galileo and Locard!

Someone perhaps needs to tell Moita Flores that Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson are actually fictional characters, Galileo was born in 1512 and Locard and Locards Principle of DNA transference, would completely destroy Amaral's own argument. Flores also quotes from the American TV programme 'CSI' as some kind of research tool to back his own theories up.

Quie incredible! Yet this is the kind of libel and defamation that Mr Mrs McCann have been fighting in the 2 and a half years since their daughter was abducted.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Body Language

After that brief synopis of Goncalo Amaral and the investigation, we come to the man himself and his body language, which despite his claims that he cannot speak English (claims that are challenged), the body language is alarming, even to the untrained eye!

Look at this photograph of him, posing in front of a picture of the book he wrote and an image fo the child Madeleine McCann, whom he failed to find, in actual fact he failed to turn up one clue of any significance, he looks like he wants to be anywhere but standing there at that moment in time.

Look at this picture, look at what his stance is saying, what is it portraying?

He is turned in only slightly towards the picture of Madeleine, his head is held stiffly at an angle, you can almost see it being pulled away from the image. His right shoulder is stiff and held higher than his left shoulder, his left shoulder is dipped making it look like he is trying to turn his body away from the image.

His facial expression is quite revealing, his eyebrows furrowed into the center and the look in his eyes cannot be covered up, the look is almost fear, fear of this little girl? Or fear of looking at her image? The right side of his mouth is downturned and it looks as if he is biting the inside this is a subconscious action, of nervousness and fear and anxiety. A person who is lying, would typically display these actions, these actions look like he is terrified of something about him being found out. Amaral looks tearful, sweaty and anxious, he is showing tension in the way he clutches the book, clutching it with both hands as if he fears someone will take it off of him at any second. The muscles in his face are taut and tense and his downturned lips are pursed and the look in his eyes are giving off messages of a deep seated anxiety, almost as if there is something in his past that he doesn't want revealed.

These signals are almost impossible to hide.

If you study Amaral when he is talking and you can do this on the various videos on youtube and the news etc, he always plays with his hands, he steeples his fingers and then points them towards the camera. This is a subconscious way of distracting people away from what he is actually saying. Even though Amaral has only spoken in Portuguese on camera, it is possible to see the pauses in his speech, his speech doesn't flow, he stops and pauses freequently as if to think about what he is saying, this accentuated hesitation is the sign of a liar, someone who is constantly trying to cover his tracks.

When asked a question he finds difficult to answer, Amaral will straight away go on the defensive, this is another sign of a liar.

For example, in a recent interview where he is attacking the McCanns he is asked a very difficult question, one which answered truthfully could have had serious consequences

Question: Speaking about the Jaguar, it says that has been bought with the profits of the book "The truth of lie"...

Answer: But, it doesn´t say that before this Jaguar bought in second hand, I had another one, much older.

Here Amaral is asked a direct question, one which he finds very difficult to answer, so he does not answer the question, he totally evades it. He starts by mentioning an older Jaguar e he had previously, which has absolutely no bearing on the question he has just been asked, in fact it is actually totally irrelevent and could have actually played very much against him, liars often do this and drop themselves right in it by using something of no relevance to the question asked. Amaral obviously just does not want to publicly admit that the vast amout of money he has made out of a child he failed, has purchased for him an imported luxury motor car, worth over £40.000 *before* Portuguese import taxes.

Of course what the interviewer should have done if he was being objective, was to press Amaral on this very question, as this is one of the basis of the McCanns legal action against him (that he is making an obscene amount of money out of their daughter). It is a particularly pertinant question that could have been answered by giving a straight answer, whether or not you are an Amaral follower or not, he has in fact bought a luxury motor car from the proceeds of a book about a little girl he failed to find. The interviewer could have also pressed him on this for a straight answer, the interviewer could have also pressed him on how he was able to afford the older Jaguar on a salary Amaral's own wife said was "a disgrace", before his book about Madeleine was written, as he is reported to be heavily in debt since 2002. The interview was not objective and allowed Amaral to wriggle off of the hook.

But none the less, the answer Amaral gave to this question, is very revealing in itself, it actually shows he is uncomfortable with making money out of this child, it says that he knows very well that he has failed her and her parents. In fact his answer to just this one question, ties in with what his whole body language is saying in the photograph above.

Amaral hesitates a lot in his speech, demonstrating that he is very guarded in what he is saying, the answer to the above question, just proves this. His natural timing in his speech is also revealing and his constant fidgeting and hand moving is a signal of anxiety, as if he is trying to cover something up, also look at him when he is questioned, he feigns thinking and often stares at something completely unrelated, so he does not have to look into the eyes of ther person he is talking to.

Amaral's body language is in complete contrast to the people who he has accused of murdering their own daughter, even though Kate and Gerry McCann are deeply distressed, there is an openess and honestly to their body language, they answer questions directly and they do not fidget, or strike strange poses with their hands and fingers and they do not look off into the distance, the difference between these people could not be more marked.

......................

I believe that Goncalo Amaral is lying, I believe he is covering up something hugely significant in the Madeleine McCann investigation. He is agitated, defensive and worried about being caught out and he feels very guilty about what he has done and what he continues to do and this comes across in his tense unnatural posture when he is faced with a picture of Madeleine. Even if you do not understand the language, if you have listened the recent phone call tapes, where he is threatening someone, you will note the same agitation and high pitched voice, as he gets more and more stressed, so his voice becomes higher pitched. http://www.zshare.net/download/68611337747aaed2/

(The second voice is the voice of Goncalo Amaral). (For non Portuguese speakers, you can find a summary of this conversation in English on this blog)

Goncalo Amaral also appears to freequently forget what he has said about a certain subject, he repeats things which are inconsistent and appears either very vague when asked a question he finds uncomfortable, or can relate things in minutest detail, yet when asked about what he has said at a later date, he becomes extremely vague and cannot remember, missing out vital details. A striking example of this was a "theory" of his, when pushed on a question about how and where the McCanns, foreigners in a strange country they had not visited before could have successfully hidden a body several times, he suddenly blurted out that they hid it by burying it on the beach, returning later to dig it up and move it somewhere else. This he said was a main theory, yet could provide no detail about how the McCanns could have carried this out in view of the world's media.

This was a complete fabrication and a complete deception, yet he has presented this as a serious theory.

Look at him when he is asked a question and he is about to lie about the answer a question which he finds difficult to answer, he covers his mouth with his steepled fingers and also clamps his mouth by pressing his lips together and pursing them, before he answers. This is very evident on the video he made which he calls a reconstruction. The body language on that film was a complete revelation.

As a former police detective, he has been trained in how to spot someone lying, I believe this is actually turning out to be his downfall in the Madeleine case, because he knows others are looking at him for signs of him telling lies. He has a tendency to generalise and uses words like "always" quiet a lot. This is Amaral trying to control the conversation and control is language, he also tries very hard to control his body language and during this he will hold his body rigidly, he often smiles, but his smile harldy ever reaches his eyes. I have studide a great many videos where he is talking and I have been utterly amazed at the number of times he stands in front of the camera squarely, yet his eys are never looking straight forward, they are nearly always without exception looking down and to his left, he also oftens leaks signals, being someone who has no doubt read the body language of people he has interviewed, he knows the signs and he desperately tries to cover them up in himself, but he should know that he cannot cover these signs up, they are learned from an early age and the more he tries to cover them up, the more evident they become and the more shifty he actually appears, he also accentuates with exaggerated movements of his hands.

When he is asked difficult questions he over emphasises the points which would normally tell us he is telling the truth and over uses techniques, he freequently digresses away from the real topic, when he is really under pressure he uses techniques to distract people, he often at this point introduces other points of interest, points he knows can easily distract others, so he is manipulating people and controlling the interview/conversation.
He freequently starts off an answer with "let me answer the question" this is an old politcal trick, it ususally means they are going to do anything and say anything, rather than truthfully answer the question they have just been asked, he also uses a technique of changing the question so the interviewer thinks they are getting a reply when they are not, he is giving a completely different answer.

Goncalo Amaral also tries to confuse people, this is another sign of a liar, he will often give overly complicated answers to a very simple question, he often talks about laws and acts etc, he knows fully well that the majority of people will not understand or be the least bit interested in his replies and most people will not question him, because they are embarrassed that they have not understood his answer and do not want to appear silly. This technique is used by liars quiet a lot. Amaral pauses a lot before answering a question and by contrast to using long technical replies he will sometimes give short clipped answers, such as his response when recently during an interview he asked a serious question about, whether he thought the McCanns would accuse of delaying a court case, because his legal counsel had successfullyhad it postponed, because Amaral's solicitor was said to have been quarantined after being in contact with swine flu. Amaral said; "I'm not responsible for swine flu at least that the McCanns can't pin on me".

Notice what we talked about earlier, he evaded the question and avoided answering it, although giving a response which sound like an answer when it was in fact not an answer to the question. He also went straight on the defensive and actually attacked the McCanns in the reply he gave. People who constantly lie do this. Also in another accusation (you can read about this in the phone call tape summary) one of Amaral's victims, actually makes reference to his voice, she said he uses this flat monotone "smooth talking" voice when he is on TV or talking in interviews, she has actually accused him of fooling people with this voice. This is exactly what accomplished liars do when they are in the spotlight, but when they are unguarded like on the phone call tapes, they often fly into defensive rages. In this picture above you can see Amaral is actually avoiding eye contact with the image of Madeleine, he is turning his head and shoulders away away, Amaral does this a lot in his TV interviews, usually he does this just prior to telling a lie.

Never is this more striking than in the scene in this video where he just emerges from the court doors

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6uD5ahcTvw&feature=player_embedded

His whole demeanor is one of a liar, the look on his face as he comes out of the building, looks like a smirk, this is a dead give away, Amaral is nervous, twitchy, edgy, his movements are jerky and he cannot llok straight ahead of him, he is constantly looking towards his left and to the ground. He is asked questions and he pauses before he answers each one of them, he is thinking about what he is saying, he is scared of being caught out in a lie and he is terrified he is going to trip himself up. He cannot make eye contact, he is unable to stay still, he oks like he just wants to get away as fast as possible, this is in striking contrast to Kate and Gerry McCann apart from when they were filmed coming through customs after arriving at the airport, when they in fact emerged from the court, they stood their ground, they were still and natural and relaxed and open and willing to answer questions put to them and they were not distracted, did not go on the defensive, despite the noise from a heckler.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvBhetTOnyw&feature=player_embedded

The rate that Amaral has a tendency say as little as possible about subjects he is uneasy with, such as surprise questions, the time he elaborates is when he is in a planned interview situation, where the questions are obviously stacked for him, so he has researched the answers already.
Asked a difficult question to which he has not prepared the answer, he tries to change the subject and will often repeat the interviewer's or the journalists own words back at them, with a denial. Look at his facial expressions, he grimaces a lot, blinks and swallows more, he also shrugs a great deal.

In a great many of his interviews he feels threatened, this is why he is always holding his book, or a wad of papers, or he continually holds his right arm up and across his chest, he is actually placing a barrier between him and the journalists, he perceives the journalists as an attack, he is doing the same when he constanly waves his hand around in the air, he is creating barriers and diverting attention away from his lies.

Amaral also tries to distance himself from events he will deliberately use less statements that begin with I, he also flatly denies any wrongdoing, everything in his life that goes wrong, is always the fault of someone else.

Recently he accused the McCanns of causing his famliy harm, this is patently untrue, the McCanns have been quiet about him, for almost two years, they remained quiet and Amaral took this to mean they were weak and they would not fight back, and Amaral became bolder and bolder in his statements (another sure sign of a liar), he wrote a book, then planned another, he gave paid TV interviews and all the while he did what liars do, he made himself and his own family out to be the victims of the McCanns, when really if he had not told lies about them, had not written this book and then travelled about Europe giving paid interviews about them, then they would have probably remained quiet.

When we know that Amaral would be well versed with how liars are caught out because of his job, he over compensates for knowing and will deliberately appear way too relaxed. Take his arrival to court recently, it is absolutely understandable that he would have nerves, even if he is a former a policeman, after all a lot is at stake should he lose this case, yet he arrived looking way too relaxed, a couple of the journalists even picked up on it. He put so much effort into looking relaxed.

Amaral also used to sport a mustache and wear dark glasses, this is another trait of someone who is hiding behind a barrier.

All these things are meaningless alone and any one individual can ahave a few of these traits naturally and this does not mean they are liars, however what is revealing is when you get a a person who is demonstraing a whole cluster of these behaviours, in virtually everything they say and do in certain situations.

I believe I have recognised Goncalo Amaral for what he is and that is a liar and if I am honest, the picture above where he is looking at Madeleine, along with everything else he demonstrates, I find particularly disturbing.

Continued From Post Below

2009-12-02T17:44:00.004Z

As you know, even being also a proud member of the "Justice 4 ALL Madeleine McCann family", I don’t have much time to post in there, since there’s still a lot of work to be done outside internet, and also inside internet focusing also in the Portuguese public, what I’m doing through the official website of Joana Cipriano

http://www.asmeninasquevieramdasestrelas.com/

Now a few words concerning the tape recording. My new friends Ana Sofia Bras and Jose Araujo have been persecuted, threatened, defamed and even also allegedly beaten by the evil Goncalo de Sousa Amaral and his men, since at least June of this year (Ana has been a victim of Mr (can we call a beast Mr?) Goncalo Amaral much before that date). This is a fact. They have stored on their mobile phones memories the dozens of calls they received from Mr Beast Goncalo threatening them, including death threats.

Which other reason Mr Beast Goncalo would continuously phone them after Ana and Jose stopped their mistaken relation with him and his wife? Anyway, the tape recording could be obvious proof of his criminal activity because Mr Beast Goncalo de Sousa Amaral clearly says things like:

- "A few moments ago you saw me and ran away from me. When you see me be quiet and do not run away from me".

[so who’s persecuting who, and who is running away from who?];

[Jose says he is free to walk on the streets including by Mr Beast Goncalo house door, and Mr Beast answers:]
- "OK, very well, I’m waiting for you, come here right now. For you I don’t even have to get my hands dirty, because it’s enough to kick you»"

[WARNING - EXPLICIT LANGUAGE] - «Why are you upset for me having an affair with your wife? Every night she goes out she ***** with other men. She is ****** every single day, every single night. She is ****** on her pussy, she is ****** on her ***, she is ****** on her mouth. She even ****** with four guys inside a car on the parking place of her job, on her mouth, ***** and mouth. I’ve even heard that they ****** on her ears, and she was fired because of that. So you go talk with all those guys and not only with me. Even with the black men of Praia da Rocha she ****** with! You know, her ****job is a ****, she doesn’t know how to do it. And you know she screams a lot when the **** is inside her, she screams like hell and wakes up all the neighbours. And her daughter is not yours! She was already pregnant from another man before you go to Mexico».

[So, how dares this beast even talk about decency and children rights, when he is one of the worse beasts on the face of the Earth! Who is defaming who? Mr Beast Goncalo Amaral defamed seriously Ana trying to split this couple again. Ana is not a *****. Ana was never fired because of any sexual activity. Diana is daughter of both Ana and Jose].

- «I will shoot you with one of my most golden bullets. Do you know what is like to be shoot in the middle of your eyes?».

- «I will sign your papers whenever I want». [The portuguese expression was "Eu faco-te a folha quando eu quiser", literally "I can do your sheet whenever I want"; in Portugal "fazer a folha" to someone means harming a person with illegal methods; an example of "fazer a folha" to someone is planting fake evidence on someone’s car in order to send the victim to jail].

And many other evil and criminal things Mr Beast Goncalo de Sousa Amaral said in those two phone calls.

After being persecuted during so many time, including by insistent phone calls FROM Mr Beast Goncalo, Ana and Jose finally decided to prepare a tape recorder and to dial the Beast in order to record his menaces. Otherwise, they would have to walk all the day with the tape recording, risking not having the good environment for the recording, including the silence of a private house.

So, because of all that, the tape recording is completely legal, and that also according with the article 34 of the Portuguese Penal Code, which states:

Article 34
Necessity right
An act is not unlawful when committed as an appropriate means to avert a present danger that
threatens legally protected interests of the agent or of a third person, if the following requisites are
verified:
a) The danger situation must not have been voluntarily created by the agent, save in case of
protecting the third person’s interest;
b) There is a sensible superiority of the interest to be safeguarded relatively to the sacrificed
interest; and
c) It is reasonable to impose on the victim the sacrifice of his interest, considering the nature or
value of the threatened interest.».
Please, lets always keep working hard all together and is guilty, to send the Beast Goncalo de Sousa Amaral right away to jail, and for a long, very long period of time.
Remember that he was and STILL IS THE man responsible for Madeleine and Joana never been found and also for all the criminals involved on their abduction never been caught until now.
Goncalo de Sousa Amaral is a very evil man, a shameless convicted liar and a criminal of the worse kind.
Earth would be a much better place without that evil beast.
Thank you very much for all your cooperation, help and support!
Wherever they are, our beautiful shining little stars Madeleine and Joana are proud of us!

Link To That Threatening Phone Call By Goncalo Amaral

2009-11-26T13:06:00.004Z

Because we had to remove this link from our forum, we put it here on our blog. For Joana Morais to go to all thius trouble of having us remove the link from our forum and deny you your right to free speech in a democracy, she must be pretty scared of the contents of this phone call and what it could mean for Goncalo Amaral, ex Portuguese cop, and now convicted criminal corrupt and a liar!

Please view the post below for a summary of what was on the phone call, as it is in Portuguese.

http://www.zshare.net/download/68611337747aaed2/

We still have not got the full transcript of the tape, but I have done a summary of it, I will also include the link for any Portuguese speakers, so they can listen for themselves. Please note that while all care has been taken to be accurate, this is a translation, please also refer to the actual tape recording, found on the following link.

The call starts off with the ring tone, this is Goncalo Amaral phoning the husband of a woman he had an affair with.Amaral threatens this man several times, there is also a lot of very sexually explicit language, this mainly comes from Goncalo Amaral, in this conversation he refers to "ears" in a sexually explicit way.

This is not the first time that Amaral has phoned this man or his wife, he has done so several times before, each time to threaten them and insult the lady (Ana).The conversation is very derogatory not only towards Mrs Ana Bras, but it is derogatory towards women in general, it really does show how much of a misogynist that Amaral is.

The whole phone call was made to try and goad and intimidate Ana's husband, don't forget this man (Ana's husband) is also the man that had an affair with Amaral's wife. Apparently, he had an affair with Amaral's wife deliberately to get back at Amaral for having an affair with his own wife. (Ana)
Apparently Ana, is a really beautiful woman and when she ended her ill judge and mistaken liaison with Amaral, he flipped and could not take it, he was eaten up with jealousy, so decided to take it out on her husband.Amaral's wife (Sofia) knew how infatuated Goncalo Amaral was with this young woman and she has allegedly both physically and verbally attacked Ana.

During the phone call, Amaral refers to Ana's husband as black and he makes some derogatory comments about him being black. Ana's husband then retorted, that black he may be, but that it did not seem to bother his (Amaral's) wife Sofia, apparently she liked this.

Also Amaral made a filthy untrue accusation about Ana, apparently sleeping around, but of course he was smited and rejected by this beautiful young woman, so Amaral would say that, probably out of spite because Ana dumped him, because she regretted becoming involved with him and wanted to try and get her marriage back on track.

Of course this is not verbatim and I have put it more pleasantly, but you get the picture now.

There is also mention of money, Ana and her husband own their own home and this is something that seems to bother Amaral.

Ana’s husband says to Goncalo Amaral

:Husband: I’ve my own house, and the house were you live is not yours but of your wife's, it is on your wife's name.

Amaral: The house is mine, it is on my wife's name, but it was bought with my money!

This is a very important affirmation from Goncalo Amaral, because it proves that for a long time now, it would appear that Amaral has been passing his money - money allegedly "obtained with criminal activity" (as with his book and film) - to other persons names! Amaral can then turn around and say to the courts and to the press, that he owns nothing, and because of this he cannot pay anything - not his debts and perhaps the compensations asked by Joana and Madeleine parents.

Although this is likely to affect Leonor Cipriano more that than the McCanns, because of course the Portuguese courts have already frozen Goncalo Amaral's assets.

This is a very important information that is recorded on this tape, hopefully it can be used Mr Mrs McCann, but is should all be the subject of a thorough police investigation.

Also this does land Joana Morais in a very sticky situation, it now appears that she is collecting money for Amaral's "defense fund", money Joana is taking off of old age pensioners, (who she has persuaded to donate their pensions), to place in a fund to pay for Goncalo Amaral's defense. yet no one is clear for which defense?

Amaral, already a convicted criminal, liar and perjurer, guilty of perverting the course of justice, is facing several court trials, all of them very serious, some which if he is found guilty will see him face prison of up to 12 years!

Amaral is now knowingly allowing this collection of this fund, when he has "allegedly" been stashing cash away in the names of other people, trying to preempt this court action.

Now Joana Morais knows this too, so why is she taking old aged pensioners money? This is a huge and dirty scam.

There was also Amaral doing a lot of talking and shrieking and shouting about horns and sheets, the sheet of course refers to the saying "making a bed now lie in it".The horns talk refers to "I will break you apart", (I will turn your horns up side down)

Amaral threatens by saying: "I will put you down by kicking you and without needing to use my hands".

Amaral also says: "I will shoot you on the middle of your eyes", etc, etc.

The last one (shooting Ana’s husband) is a death threat and is very serious, even more for a retired police officer who owns fire arms. This is why Ana and her husband have reported Goncalo Amaral and his "friends" to the PJ and the local police, (they have incident numbers and proof) and also why Ana and her husband has now written to the Portuguese attorney general twice, asking him for help and protection, these people are literally living in fear of their lives!

There was also a mention about an ear, I am sorry I cannot share this with you, but I will leave this to your imagination, it was something Amaral said when he was really getting irate and it is extremely explicit!

Over all Amaral loses it big time in the phone calls that I have listened to and Ana's husband stays quiet and calm under severe provocation.

What Amaral also says towards Ana is: "Eu faço-te a folha quando eu quiser", in English, "I sign your papers when I wish".

In Portugal, "fazer a folha" means to harm someone by illegal methods.

This phrase on tape may very well be used as proof that Goncalo Amaral's authenticity of the allegations towards Ana and her husband that Amaral has also threatened them, with planting drugs in their car, in order to send them to jail.

Apparently this is a good example of "fazer a folha" to someone.

Besides all that, there are lots of other verbal offences allegedly made by Goncalo Amaral, and these include very serious defamation against Ana concerning her sexual behaviour. As already said above, Ana admits to making a serious mistake and with her husband now, just want to be left alone to repair their relationship and save their marriage.

But Amaral doesn't do this, apparently he keeps phoning pestering and threatening them. Also Ana has explained she was first seduced by Amaral's sweet smooth talking and she states, this is exactly what he does on the TV and radio etc, she thought he was a man who had been wronged by the McCanns and the press, but as she got to know Amaral, she soon became aware of his very dangerous malevolent side to him, she came to know him as a liar and she knew the image he was portraying of himself on the TV and the radio etc was a totally false image, she became afraid of him, knew she had made a terrible mistake and got out of their relationship, which he apparently did not take kindly to and then all of this allegedly resulted.

While as already explained, that Amaral has made several serious defamation of character about Ana, (he can be heard in the bars and restaurants of Portimao and Praia da Rocha, where apparently he sits and drinks heavily nearly all day, every day when he has nothing else to do, this is where he defames Ana to anyone who will listen, he also allegedly talks about the Madeleine investigation.

However, we should remember that Amaral has made serious sexual allegations which were never proved against Leonor Cipriano and her brother and her partner, Leandro Silva (along with allegations of torture against Leandro Silva, which he (Amaral) is due to stand trial for very soon.

He has also done much the same against Kate and Gerry McCann, during and after his botched investigation of their abducted daughter Madeleine from Prai da Luz. That’s also a crime and has already reported to the Portuguese authorities.

There is some interesting "pillow talk" though and this is from Sofia Leal-Amaral!!!! It involves accusations about her (Sofia) allegedly saying that she only stays with Amaral for financial reasons and that perhaps we all wrote off the large sum of money which was allegedly paid to a GNR about the time of Madeleine's abduction a bit too hastily!

Oh yes, there is much more to come out about this man Goncalo Amaral and Ana made a wise choice as soon as she discovered what and who he really was, got away from him! Ana and her husband just want to be left alone now to work and repair their marriage and enjoy raising their daughter, without fear of something happening to the child and to them. They have been physically and mentally threatened and have to live in fear that Goncalo Amaral has allegedly told them that he could make something happen to them, without getting his hands dirty!

They have also been threatened that someone will plant drugs on them and they will go to prison.They most of all fear that something bad will happen to their daughter, that she will be abducted or something else and that it would be made to look like they had been responsible for it. (Ring any bells?)

People need to remember that this couple have had the strength and courage to report all of this to the PJ and the local police and to the Portuguese attorney general on several occasions and that they are literally living in fear of what Amaral may have done to them! The more people that know this, the less likely it is that anything will happen to them as it would be absolutely foolhardy to do this now, as we all know about the threats and intimidation and so do the Portuguese police and the Portuguese attorney general.And still some idiots like Morais, Bennett etc believe in Amaral? Makes you laugh really, here you have actual proof of what that man has been up to and they ignore all that and then prefer to believe a lot of make believe and unsubstantiated comments about the McCanns, mainly started and put about by the convicted criminal liar himself, Goncalo Amaral!

Now my skit on

http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/goncalo-amaral-wife-f55/at-home-with-the-goncs-parties-r-us-t2115.htm

Will make some more sense!

At Home With The Goncs - Parties 'R' Us!

2009-11-22T14:33:00.005Z

Sofia and Goncalo

(What Big Ears You Have)

SOFIA: Goncalo, what shall we do to celebrate Christmas and The New Year?

GONCALO: I thought we could hold two very large parties and tick off the neighbours, when we fight and brawl in the street and drive cars around the neighbourhood really fast.

SOFIA: But I thought all your assets have been frozen? (His assets have been frozen a long time)

GONCALO: They have, but that doesn't matter, I can get money.

SOFIA: How come? From where?

GONCALO: Don't bother yourself about it, just order the fireworks before they sell out of all the best most expensive ones.

SOFIA: OK darling, how many shall I order?

GONCALO: Oh around €3000/€4000 should do a nice little display.

SOFIA: Where shall we hold the parties?

GONCALO: Same place we held my birthday bash.

SOFIA: What about if we get "unwelcome guests"?

GONCALO: Don't worry about that, I will have them beaten up and tortured without dirtying my hands.

SOFIA: Oh you are such a big (coward) brave man Goncalo.

GONCALO: Yes I know, and the best thing is I never have to wash my hands or make my own sheet (bed)

SOFIA: Do you think you could write a book about it?

GONCALO: Maybe, what could I call it?

SOFIA: How about; 'How To Torture Innocent People - Without getting Your Hands Dirty?'

GONCALO: Good idea. But first I have to go to the bank to withdraw money to pay for our parties and I must stop off on the way back to buy my large finest cigars.

SOFIA: I hope you are not going (whoring) drinking in the bars of Portimao again!

GONCALO: No of course not, but I have to pop in to see my friends and to speak in a very loud voice so everyone can overhear me, you know how I love to sound important.

SOFIA: [Under her breath- Yes full of carp]

GONCALO: What was that about a harp?

SOFIA: Oh nothing Gonky darling, anyway, I thought the nasty McCanns and judges have had all our bank accounts frozen?

GONCALO: Oh I am going to the bank and raiding the account Joana Morais set up for me.

SOFIA: But I thought that account was in the name of Paulo Sargento, that friend of the FFF? and that the money was supposed to be for your defense?

GONCALO: Who the flip is this FFF?

SOFIA: You know, your friend too, the Fat French Fantasist, Duarte Levy, that one who was (cough, cough) a friend of Joana Morais.

GONCALO: Oh yes of course, he gave me all my ideas for the Madeleine investigation and for making millions €'s off of Madeleine, but that dirty rat has not come up with the 24 photos he promised me yet!

SOFIA: He also hasn't repaid Joana for her mobile phone either and she isn't too pleased apparently.

GONCALO: Well don't worry about that now, Joana Morais has kindly sent Paulo Sargento a bank card and he is giving it to me to make withdrawals, so don't worry my darling, we will have the best Christmas and New year ever.

SOFIA: Oh aren't people so wonderful to donate to your (Christmas and New Year festivities and fireworks) Defense?

GONCALO: Yes especially all those old age pensioners who have been coerced into donating their pensions - so very kind.

SOFIA: But if you spend that money on fireworks, wine, fine food and cigars etc, how will you pay for your defense?

GONCALO: Defense? Why do you keep on about this defense? I have no defense.

SOFIA: Yes dear, I know you have no defense, you know you have no defense, but the donating sheeples, they do not seem to know you have no defense.

GONCALO: I know, it is very good, this means that they will keep on donating, the money will keep on rolling in and we can keep (living the high life) it for my defense.

SOFIA: But if Joana raises the money for your defense you will have to go to court and you will need money to pay for a lawyer and if you keep spending the defense money, you will not be able to go to court to prove you are innocent!

GONCALO: Yes exactly, stupid woman, so what is the problem? But you are so thick!

SOFIA: [Penny drops and sighs] drat I thought I would get rid of you for a few years

GONCALO: What? Speak up woman I can't hear you.

SOFIA: [Deaf B******d you weren't meant to] Oh nothing dear, I couldn't bear losing you.

GONCALO: Oh I know how you feel, I am such a stud after all.

SOFIA: Yes Goncalo you are such a (dud) stud, how come you know Joana Morais so well?

GONCALO: (Sigh) Don't start all of that again.

SOFIA: I mean it Goncalo, if I catch you at it again and with this Joana, I will do more than throw your clothes and shoes into the bar this time.

GONCALO: Oh and what can you do? Remember I can do anything I want and I don't get my hands dirty, remember the other Christmas?

SOFIA: Yes I remember when you threatened to kill me and took our little daughter for a ride in the police car after you had been drinking.

GONCALO: Yes and I got away with it, I told you, I can get away with anything.

SOFIA: [Under her breath sighs Fat evil pig]

GONCALO: What? What did you say?

SOFIA: Oh nothing dear, I just said, (fat evil pig) 'that wig'

GONCALO: Wig? What is it with this wig?

SOFIA: The one I'm buying you for Christmas to cover your bald spot on the back of your fat lying head.

GONCALO: I haven't got a bald spot and I thought you were buying me the other earring?

SOFIA: Of course dear [fat bald pig] I hear they have also started the Unca Am Earring Fund

GONCALO: Is there an echo in here?

SOFIA: Maybe since they repossessed all the furniture, it does echo a bit.

GONCALO: Walking around waving his arms about, mutters and cusses a few times. That furniture was old anyway, when is all the new stuff coming?

SOFIA: When we have paid for it.

GONCALO: [Blasted people taking all my lovely money away] Never mind, I'll get the money for the furniture later, when I am at the bank of Joana Morais.

SOFIA: How are you getting to the bank baldy? They have confiscated your top of the range Jaguar worth €80.000.

GONCALO: Don't worry, Paulo Cristavoa is giving me a lift, he is coming along with Baptista and Fernando, they are bringing their "shots". And stop calling me baldy, it is bad for my stud image.

SOFIA: That was such a nice car dear! How did you get it?

GONCALO: It was nothing really, I just lied a lot.

SOFIA: Oh no change there then, they say you must stick to what you know best.

SOFIA: Goncalo, I was thinking, if you go to court, will you have Dr Antonio Cabrita represent you?

GONCALO: Well stop thinking, what have I told you about thinking? Women are not meant to think, they are just there for cooking, washing, and cleaning etc and er (cough) the other.

SOFIA: The other? What is this other? Never mind that, what about Dr Cabrita?

GONCALO: He is useless, I would like to make his sheet without dirtying my hands (Goncalo Shouts) WHY DO YOU KEEP ON ABOUT THIS CABRITA ANYWAY?

SOFIA: Oh no reason, I think he likes my ears.

GONCALO: Ears? Why you say ears?

SOFIA: Oh no reason dear. ("ear, ear")

GONCALO: What do you say that I ask that lawyer Dr Marcos Aragao Correia to represent me? He is excellent lawyer you know.

SOFIA: Yes I know he is, [he certainly done you up] but he will never represent you, he hates you, he thinks you are a cloven beast [you are]

GONCALO: Oh it doesn't matter what he thinks, I can bully, intimidate, torture and threaten him into submission into representing me.

SOFIA: He doesn't scare easily Goncalo, [he is not a defenseless woman or the distraught parents of an abducted child] I think he will laugh and spit in your face and stamp on your cloven hoof.

GONCALO: No matter, I will send around Baptista, Fernando and Cristovao, to threaten him with their shots and sheets and horns.

SOFIA: What like Dr Joao Grade?

GONCALO: Exactly! Who told you about him?

SOFIA: Oh no one I just guessed [thug], but I don't think it will work, Dr Correia has principles!

GONCALO: Sigh, you are right, maybe I will have to stick with the useless Dr Antonio Cabrita, but no funny business with him and your ears!

SOFIA: Oh no Goncalo, but that reminds me, how is Felicia Cabrita?

GONCALO: Eh? Who told you about her?

SOFIA: No one, I saw the bank account and smelled her perfume, you know I have the best nose in Portimao, I am known for it.

GONCALO: Yes your nose is certainly [big enough] good.

SOFIA: You can talk, your nose grows each time you speak.

GONCALO: You really need to stop this and better not walk near any stairs, or you will be wearing those huge designer glasses [that little Madeleine bought you] again.

SOFIA: Well just stay away from my ears!

GONCALO: We need to reflect on the trouble I am in. What do you think?

SOFIA: I think it is your mess and [hopefully you will go to prison for a long time] you need to clear it up, you know lie to the Portuguese public some more.

GONCALO: Good idea, I can tell them anything and they will believe me, if they don't I can threaten them and their families.

SOFIA: What about the British public?

GONCALO: I don't know, I have tried to lie to them and threaten them, but they just tell me to go forth and multiply, I cannot understand it, they are not one bit scared of me.

SOFIA: I don't understand, I thought Joana Morais and Tony Bennett, had done a good job on them and they all believed your lies?

GONCALO: Oh that is just some of them, just the idiots like Brenda Ryan, Tony Bennett and Thug and the pathetico sheeples like the racist Greens and that thick Ambernoodle head etc.

SOFIA: Are you telling me that nearly all of the British public do not believe your lies and are not scared of your threats?

GONCALO: Yes.

SOFIA: Well then, I am not going and you can tell Tony Bennett to take the sex and go option, because there is no way I am going to his draughty church hall for his annual Konference, just to get humiliated and embarrassed.

GONCALO: I can't go on my own, I wont have anyone to translate for me and apparently I will have to stay at Debbie's house.

SOFIA: I thought Debbie and Tony had fallen out?

GONCALO: Oh don't worry they'll kiss and make up!

KNOCK! KNOCK!

SOFIA: I think your [bully boy thugs] friends have arrived, time for you to go to the bank of Joana.

GONCALO: See you later.

SOFIA: Remember to get me a few thousand euros, for the children's Christmas gifts

GONCALO: OK and you remember to order those fireworks and book the restaurant for our parties.

Tony Bennett and Debbie Butler - Were At it (Apparently)

2009-11-20T11:41:00.006Z

Well is it a surprise, given Ms Butler's cyber history of falling for men over the internet? Apparently Tony Bennett and Debbie Butler were having an affair, goodness knows what Bennett's wife makes of all this, Butler's ex husband certainly had enough of her and done the off apparently.

You know looking at them both, brings a wry smile to the face and one cut's off the mind to delving any deeper (persih the thought), but is this funny? Normally I would not bother with people and their "assignations", it is entirely up to them if they want to wreck their lives and the lives of their families, however, this is much more than a sordid little bunk up in the back seat of a car and a few stolen kissses behind the bushes in Rothley.

These are the two main players in a hate campaign,. A campaign designed to cause maximum suffering and distress to the parents of a missing child and worse still to harm an innocent child, by repeatedly frustrating the search for her.

These pair have put on one of the most unedifying dispalys of poor taste that I have ever witnessed. They have both lied through their back teeth, cheated and betrayed each other and more than this they have *BOTH* brought into this mix, a little boy, who had no right being involved in their squalid little "affair", he should have been protected at all costs. But are we surprised at their insensitivity and their thoughtlessness when it comes to others, especially children?

They maintained their hate campaign was to bring awareness about a little girl that neither of them knew and about her parents, her family and their friends, which again, neither of them knew.
Where is Madeleine McCann in all of their sordid little goings on? Where has she been as these two batted bricks at each other these past weeks?

A little girl lost again, and badly let down by adults, again, a plague on both their houses!

I always maintained that Bennett and Butler's grubby and scurrilous Madeleine Foundation, was not about Madeleine, it was all about making money for Bennett and once more enabling him to jump on a high profile bandwagon, to get his ugly face in the attention of the media, you would think with £90.000 stashed away in various accounts, that he would at least treat himself to a pair of decent glasses, some specs that do not make him look like he is staring at you from behind milk bottle bottoms.

Bennett slighted Butler, just like Thierry slighted Ireland, the difference being, France got a goal where Bennett and Butler have scored classic own goals, did they learn from the first mistake? No, they carry on repeatedly banging home their ball into the back of their own net!

The lies that have been told by each of the are too numerous to mention, but yesterday, we were treated to another "whrant" (whine & rant), this time from Bennett, where he has stated that millions of people haave been flooding to his website because they do not believe the McCanns version of events. (Yet again he is inciting defamation, by making unfounded allegations). My question is this:

"If it is all exactly as Bennett says, and people in their thousands, have been donating to the Madeleine Foundation, through their DONATE facility and buying their *banned* booklet, perhaps Tony Bennett AND Debbie Butler, can explain; whose name the Paypal account is in that such donations were made through? How much is laying in that Paypal account? How much has passed through that paypal account and into whose bank account did withdrawals from paypal get paid into?

Also there is a discrepancy in what Bennett has maintained, if all these people have been donating in their thousands after the disgraceful Rothley incident, as this is only recently, where is all the money? Thosands is plural, so at least 2000 booklets sold at £4, is approximately £8000, put this together with any funds already in the account, where has all the money gone?

Or have we once again caught Bennett out in another contemptuous lie? In fact after his despicable Rothley soiree, no such people in their droves wanted to find out more about the McCanns and no such people in their thousands bought the book?

Either way, Bennett is again caught out in yet another lie.

This brings me to Bennett and the Rothely leaflet drop.

Bennett said he did not lie about being in Rothely. Yes he did lie, he told huge enormous lies and what is more he set up Debbie Butler as the fall woman to take all the flak, for the Rothley fall out, when they realised that they had made a huge and fatal error in trying to terrorise the innocent parents of Madeleine McCann in their own home! They realised that the public turned on them ferociously, when they overstepped the mark and sneaked into Rothley under cover of darkness, to stuff their vile leaflets into the doors of the McCanns neighbours homes, in a vain bid, to attempt to turn the McCanns neighbours against them and so, not only make the lives of Mr Mrs McCann hell there, but also make the lives of Madeleine's little twin brother and sister hell also.

Bennett bare faced said he was not in attendance at Rothely and that there was only three people leafleting and as we already knew two of them were on a motorbike, we knew exactly who the three were, Debbie Butler; Grenville Green and Helene-Davies Green (known to have dealings with UKIP, Veritas and National Front).
Bennett said he was not there, now he says he did not lie about being there, so he was there.

Again Bennett is caught out in another contemptuous lie.

Why did he lie about being in Rothley? Why did he repeatedly infer that a photographer has said of Ms Butler, that his editor had wanted a picture of her looking like a "hard faced cow?" This was simply completely untrue, yet at every given opportunity, Bennett not only dropped those that leafleted Rothley in it by referring to the "THREE", he also persistently referred to the untrue quote of a national newspaper, by calling Debbie Butler a "hard faced cow", why did he do this to Ms Butler?

Why did Tony Bennett, Debbie Butler, Grenville Green and his wife Helene Davies-Green, show a total lack of concern for the welfare of the McCann twins?

People warned Debbie Butler repeatedly about her own small son, they told her how prone and opne to bullying and gossip he would be because of her activities, they told her she would come under the auspices of social services herself for the continued way she was leaving her son to go travelling about the country, pursuing her hate campaign, did she listen? No, she just carried on and she carried on because she was "carrying on" with Bennett at the time, so all thought and reason for thsoe people getting hurt went completely out of the window.

If Debbie Butler cannot care for her own son and put the needs of him before anything and anyone else, as it should be, how can she have the bare faced cheek to tell the McCanns, that they were wrong? How could she write to social services demanding those twins be taken into care, considering Butler's own background?
How could Butler write to the General Medical Council complaining about the ethics of Kate and Gerry McCann, asking for them to be struck from the medical register because they may be "depressed" about their eldest daughter, when Butler's very own code of ethics are non existent?

How can Bennett say he wants to improve the lives of children, when he has blatantly lied and misrepresented about Madeleine's disappearance?

How Can Bennett say he wants to help children, when he blatently lied and included a parents aid charity, to help him sell his own book for his own personal gains? Forcing the charity to declare on their website that they have niothing at all to do with this man Tony Bennett?

How can Bennett say that he wants to help children, when he just mercilessly used the child of his alleged ex lover, in order to improved his own sullied standing in the media and the online community?

The McCanns have been forced to waste their valuable time stopping the likes of Bennett and Butler, while they were wasting time on that, they were lsong time looking for their precious daughter, but this much at least should cheer the "Bastardly Duo" (sic), for the one thing they want over and above anything else, is the search for Madeleine called off and that dear little child not to be found, this is in order that they can keep on doing the things they are doing and using Madeleine to make money out of and to propel themselves into the lime light.

Debbie Butler and Tony Bennett, you are fooling noone, save a few no ones, the non entities, the bitter and twisted dregs of society.

Vile,vile creatures.

Debbie Butler and Tony Bennett UNTIE The Knot!

2009-11-11T13:22:00.003Z

Bennett and Butler Split!

Goncalo Amaral's New Jaguar Seized!

2009-10-24T18:03:00.005+01:00

Disgraced Former Detective's New Jaguar Seized

Goncalo Amaral the former police inspector who first led the hunt for missing child Madeleine McCann, has had his brand new £70.000 Jaguar motor car seized. This action follows in a line of similar actions against the former detective, who has also been convicted of lying and perjury and concealing evidence of the torture of Leonor Cipriano. Amaral is currently serving an 18 month suspended prison sentence. Yesterday it was also revealed that the appeals that have been lodged to increase his sentence and commute it to an actual term to be served in prison is being held up because the 8 jurors from his trial, are currently owed fees. In Portugal no further trials can go ahead until the jurors are paid. Goncalo Amaral and Paulo Cristovao and three other ex PJ inspectors, elected trial by jury, it is not clear if it is they that have to pay the jurors and this is why proceedings are being held up.

QUOTE:_________________________________

"Here is the full news from Expresso, about Gonzo´s jag: Justice takes Jaguar from Gonçalo Amaral. Court keeps with Jaguar of Gonçalo Amaral. Copyright and share of the former inspector of PJ at the company he created were also arrested. The Civil Court of Lisbon, who, this week ordered the arrest of the copyright of the book of Gonçalo Amaral, about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, a also the documentary which follow it, considers that the member company created by the former coordinator of PJ cannot produce, and remove the proceeds to him personally for the sales of books and videos. Therefore, following the claim from the McCann family, decided through a trial process, arrested also the share of Amaral in the company, a third of his salary as a manager and even the jaguar he drives - but that belongs to the firm. The car, with a displacement of 2700 cc and with a price of around 70 thousand euros new, was purchased in May and registered in the name of the sopciety Gonçalo Amaral Ltd, with a social capital of 5000 euros. The company, created in November last year, offers consultancy, studies and analysis in the field of criminal investigation and is specialized in the dissemination, promotion and communication of technical work. The notifications to the publishers who published the book "Maddie - the truth of lies" - followed at the beginning of last week to several european countries: Italy, Netherlands, Denmark, Germany, Spain and France. The publisher Guerra & Paz "War & Peace" (which published the book in Portugal), (owner of Correio da Manhã, where Amaral has a weekly columnist), the Valentim de Carvalho and TVI were also notified of the arrest of the copyright are due to the former coordinator of PJ until a final decision on the ongoing process. Contacted by the Expresso newspaper, Gonçalo Amaral declined to make any comment on the decision of the Civil Court, referring to its position to a press release issued on Wednesday. In that document, Amaral "fears to get prevented to defend his reasons in court and admits constraints related to his own defense". Kate and Gerry McCann, who were considered "arguidos" during the process of investigation, and their three minor children. Sean, Amelie and Madeleine, are the applicants of the ongoing process in court. They require to the former inspector, a compensation of 1.2 million euros by defamation, due to claims "continued and blatant" about the investigation of ther case in 2007. However, according to the assessment made by the Court, the assets of Amaral does not offer sufficient guarantees for the payment in case of conviction. The house of Olhão which he bought together with his wife in 2002, with a loan from the BIC, but it is only registered in his wife´s name - was arrested in 2005 due to a debt of around 130 thousand euros. A year later, the National Treasury recorded the seize of a house as a guarantee of payment of 16900 euros. Finally, two years ago, was the BES (to whom now BIC belongs) to go forward with a executive action against Amaral and his wife, for the recovery of more than 300 thousand euros - new seized. The book "Maddie- the truth of lies" was launched in July 2008 and, until the end of September, has 12 editions - in other words - 120 thousand books. However, in September, also, by Court decision, the book´s sales had already been banned. Gonçalo Amaral retired from PJ in July last year, after 26 years of service. At the time, he said he went out to have "full freedom of expression", after having been sacked, months before the investigation of the disappearance of the British child, due to statements made to the media. Currently, Amaral receives a pension for early retirement of 2039 euros. The inquiry was shelved in July 2008, without being cleared any responsability of the parents of the British child of three years old who disappeared at May three of 2007, at Praia da Luz. The couple McCann was cleared, and the "arguido status" removed."

UNQUOTE______________________________________

It is clear that Goncalo Amaral is heavily in debt and has been for some years, questions need to be asked and answered.

By his wife Sofia's own admissions Amaral was not on a very high salary, so how were they allowed to commit themselves to such high risk enormous financial ventures?

Exactly how much capital have they had at their disposal and where has it all come from?

Amaral saw his good friend Paulo Cristovao (who also stood trial and is also currently standing trial at present in Portugal) make money out of missing Joana Cipriano, by writing a book about the child and the investigation. (Currently Leonor Cipriano's conviction for the murder of her daughter, is the subject of an appeal which cannot be heard until the jurors are paid for attending the trial that proved she was tortured.) Leonor Cipriano's conviction is looking to be one of Portugal's biggest miscarriages of justice!

Against all logical reasoning Goncalo Amaral made Kate and Gerry McCann arguidos. He made them suspects on the back of so-called sniffer dog "evidence", that never existed and could not ever be corroborated, during a farcical operation and not even making the apartment where Madeleine was abducted from a crime scene until some THREE MONTHS AFTER she was taken.

Goncalo Amaral should be arrested and questioned over his total failure in conducting the abysmal investigation into Madeleine's disappearance. Amaral made every single mistake there was to make, mistakes, you would not even expect a rookie detective to make, question is why and is it feasible that a detective said to have all of the experience of Amaral would make all these mistakes? If I were a cynic, I would think these mistakes that destroyed the Madeleine McCann investigation were made on purpose, to purposefully thwart that investigation so Madeleine could not be found.

Is it plausible to even start to think that Madeleine McCann was stolen to order, for an illegal adoption by people living in and around Praia da Luz? And that some in authority knew she was going to be abducted and that those people have done nothing but obstruct the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine, right from the word go?

Perhaps Madeleine was abducted in order for some to operate a money making scam, only it certainly wasn't her poor long suffering parents.

There is something very deep and sinister at work here and it is becoming clearer with each passing day, that the McCanns have suffered horrifically and their daughter abducted probably to order.

I think it is time for the Madeleine investigation to be reopened, but NOT conducted by the Portuguese, I think it is time for Interpol to become involved, this is as serious as it gets, and it is now patently obvious that Portugal is incapable of holding an investigation free from corruption!

THIS IS THE LIFE OF AN INNOCENT CHILD WE ARE TALKING ABOUT

NOT ONLY MADLEINE McCANN

BUT THE INVESTIGATION INTO MISSING JOANA CIPRIANO *MUST* ALSO BE RE-OPENED.

Lies, beatings, Threats and Court Cases That Lay Behind The Madeleine McCann Investigation

2009-10-17T18:16:00.012+01:00

The Amarals, So Much In Love?

If you believe recent reports, you would be forgiven for thinking that the disgraced former policia judiciaria detective, Goncalo Amaral, is enjoying a second honeymoon with his 2nd wife, Sofia Leal-Amaral. They stage photo-shoots holding each others hands and posed arms entwined trying to give the impression of being so much in love.

The Amarals, holding hands emulating Kate and Gerry McCann, but one suspects if the Amarals were to suffer only one fraction of trials that have beset Kate and Gerry, their relationship would fall apart at the seams. The Amarals seem to me to have a sham of a marriage, one held together by a bank account and not the love mutual respect that has kept the McCanns relationship strong, during their most horrific of times and darkest of days since their beloved and much adored eldest daughter Madeleine, was abducted from her bed whilst on a family holiday in Praia da Luz in May 3rd 2007.

In May 2009, Goncalo Amaral was convicted of withholding evidence of the torture of Leonor Cipriano, the mother of another missing child, Joana Cipriano. Amaral was tried and convicted of lying and perjury and received an 18 month suspended prison sentence, a sentence that caused eyebrows to raise across the world because of its leniency, a sentence that Leonor Cipriano's lawyer, Dr Marcos Arageo Correia, has appealed to have increased and converted to an actual prison sentence.

Goncalo Amaral is also facing another trial for the torture of the partner of Leonor Cipriano, Leandro Silva, in fact, Goncalo Amaral has several trials looming on his horizon, not least a civil trial for his defamation of character of Kate and Gerry McCann, where he is going to be sued for £1.2 million. Amaral has amassed a fortune using the name of abducted child, Madeleine McCann, his get rich quick schemes include writing two books one which has had an injunction slapped upon it by a Portuguese judge, this does not bode well for his defamation trial, which he is tipped to lose, other schemes include him writing for a column for the Portuguese newspapers Correo da Manha and 24 Horas, these two newspapers always give Amaral favourable coverage, the truth being a number one casualty. For some in Portugal, Goncalo Amaral is viewed like some kind of avenging angel, fighting a lone battle for the truth and justice for Madeleine, however, when Amaral was actually in charge of the investigation, he made every mistake there was to make and instead of looking for and searching for the truth for Madeleine, Amaral looked for 3 hour 10 minute booze fuelled lunch breaks instead. On the day the Madeleine investigation entered its 150th day, the man in charge, cut a slovenly figure as he was pictured and timed leaving his office and strolling up to the Carvi fish restaurant, this meant on that particular Friday, with Madeline still missing and over 250 leads waiting to be investigated properly, instead he dined at the Carvi with an ex Formula 1 Portuguese racing driver and was overheard being totally unprofessional boasting about the case and talking loudly, proclaiming that the police case was that Madeleine was dead and her parents killed her. On that day 30th September 2007 @ 1.17pm: Goncalo Amaral casually strolled out of the police building and takes a leisurely walk to the Carvi restaurant with his boss Guilhermino Encarnacao - dubbed Inspector Clueless - who is making a rare visit to the investigation. Meanwhile on another Friday in September 2007 Amaral was seen at 10am, as he sat slurping coffee and cakes at the Kalahary cafe in Portimao again with his boss, Chief Inspector Guillermino Encarnacao. With an ever increasing amount of leads coming into the investigation, the men leading it had time to waste on 3 hour lunch breaks, later when the official files on the case were released, it was discovered that hundreds of what could have been vital leads were lost or not followed up, that e-fits of suspects were taken from eye witnesses and yet never shown to the public, it was revealed how farcical the whole investigation had been run. Especially when you learn that Amaral did not make the apartment Madeleine was abducted from a crime scene until some THREE MONTHS LATER, if this wasn't bad enough, Amaral had also allowed the apartment to be let out to other holiday makers in the meantime thus compromising and destroying any forensic DNA evidence that the abductors may have left behind!

truly staggering incompetence!

Goncalo Amaral Before he Made Himself a Millionaire Off of Madeleine McCann

Apparently Amaral can now be seen regularly frequenting the bars near where he lives, in fact in one of those bars, it has been reported that his wife, Sofia Leal, on learning of her husband's affair with a beautiful young 35 year old woman (name withheld), after smelling perfume on him becoming suspicious because he was staying out until the early hours and sometimes all night, took his expensive new designer suits, shirts and shoes and through them through the door of a restaurant accompanied with a note telling everyone just what a pig her husband was and what he had been up to. Not content with embarrassing the disgraced former detective in public, Sofia decided to go one step further and began an extra marital affair with the woman's husband who had, had an affair with her own husband, apparently taking him back to her marital home!

Later the two couples paths apparently crossed at a bar and a scuffle between the two men was reported and threats made and they were asked to leave the restaurant.

This took place just last summer in June 2009, at the time the Amarals were swanning around the place posing for photographs and holding hands and trying to appear so much in love!

The woman who had an affair with Amaral, broke it off and became reunited with her husband, but allegedly, their nightmare has not ended there. Goncalo Amaral was enraged and could not accept the end of the affair and much friction has resulted between the two couples as a result.
The couple have become paralysed with fear after receiving threats and phone calls, all they want is for this apparent intimidation to stop and to be allowed to get on with their lives and raise their baby daughter.

The woman and her husband (names withheld) has reported Goncalo Amaral to the Attorney General of the Republic Dr. Pinto Monteiro, on two separate occasions and have begged for his help and protection as they feel their lives are in danger. They also speak of threats from a "person" that drugs will be planted on them as evidence and they will both be convicted and face going to prison for a very long time, the husband has been threatened with by someone that has allegedly said that he can "give him a kicking" and have him shot "without getting his hands dirty".

The beleaguered couple have taken the step of writing to the Portuguese attorney general directly because they feel that if anything happens to them, at least investigators will know where to start looking for clues.

The woman who had an affair with Goncalo Amaral is very contrite and has admitted to the attorney general, that she had made a terrible mistake and was very wrong to have an affair, but said that she was seduced by the charm of Amaral's smooth talking, the same tone he uses when he appears on TV talking about the Madeleine investigation. She has said, that she has since seen and come to know a completely different side to disgraced former PJ detective, who is currently serving an 18 month suspended prison sentence for lying and perjury etc.

The couple have also had a complaint to the Public Prosecutor Faro filed on their behalf for the crimes that have allegedly been committed by Mr. Gonçalo de Sousa Amaral against them.

The woman's husband claims that he has been pushed in the street and taunted over the telephone that his little daughter is not really his daughter.
Sadly the woman reports that her daughter cries now for everything and anything as is picking up on her parents feelings of insecurity and they say they live in fear in their own home and everywhere. The couple also claim to have a video recorded on a phone where you can see the altercation between Mr. Gonçalo Amaral and her husband in a bar in Lagos.

Reports appeared in a newspaper who Amaral writes a column for, the Correo De Manha about an alleged incident at a huge 50th birthday bash for Goncalo Amaral. It was alleged that the couple and their friend arrived and started causing trouble, etc, however the couple tell a different story.

"Last night I, my husband **** ****** and our Advocate ** ***** ***** ******* went out for dinner in a restaurant in Portimao. When we asked ******* to lead us to my mother's house, to go get our daughter was in her care, as we passed by the riverside area of Portimão, we saw fireworks with the Club Naval de Portimão, and decided to stop to see, with my husband and I left the car for a cigarette fumarmos since ********* is not smoking and remained in his car, and we beside the vehicle, leaning next to a public parking area.

Herein we saw a crowd at the entrance of the restaurant "retreat of broiled fish, and what was our astonishment to see Mr. Gonçalo Amaral de Sousa to look us in the midst of them, with the same Mr Gonçalo made a sign with out to others, pointing in our direction, and these people, about four, they headed immediately for us to threaten us with great aggressiveness to immediately abandon that area of the street. We emphasize that we were on the street in full public place, on the opposite side of that restaurant. In this, individuals begin to push us hard, abusing us and beating us, and as a ******* takes a hand to the back of his pants, saying while it does not go out there gave us a shot. In this one ******** tries to start on our ****** in the car, pulling him out of the window to attack him. When we see our powerlessness and violence, we went immediately in the car of our ********, and one that ***** still managed to give a strong punch on my husband.

We went immediately to the police station in Portimão's Public Security Police where he asked to be identified the perpetrators of harm, as Mr. Gonçalo Amaral, the instigator of the crimes, we were already well known! Three agents of PSP followed my husband and our advocate to the site, and I, for fear, remained in the Police station. At the site, individuals and ******** ********, and yet another person that is not known to us, had already fled, only to be possible to identify *****. However, even ahead of the PSP, other individuals, perhaps in excess of ten, accompanied Mr. Gonçalo Amaral towards our ******** ** ****** , with Mr Gonçalo Amaral aggressively threatening him just front of his face, pointing his finger, and shouting to him "you have no shame."

We have presented immediately after each of the three of us, and yet last night, holding criminal proceedings against Mr. Gonçalo Amaral de Sousa and his henchmen, having been our complaints registered on the PSP with the numbers:

**** ****** - NUIPC 001938/09.5 PAPTM,

****************. NUIPC 001939/09.3 PAPTM,

*** ***** **** - NUIPC 001940/09.7 PAPTM.

However, during the day, Mr. Gonçalo Amaral called several times for my phone and to my husband, from an unidentified number on the display of our devices, but which can be identified by the judiciary, threaten us without shame that we would make the sheet."

Sofia Leal Amaral, has described her husband in a Sunday paper in the UK as a calm loving father who worried about his daughters having accidents in the playground at school, yet bizarrely, this worry about accidents did not stop Goncalo Amaral from sharing a bottle of wine with a friend at the Carvi restaraunt and driving his police car with his daughter inside, off somewhere.

It is hard to reconcile this Goncalo with the Goncalo that she (Sofia Amaral) reported to the Portimao police for failing to hand her daughter over at Christmas 2008, as prearranged and when she went to collect her daughter from her husband, he threatened her with death and again driving his police car after drinking alcohol, she has claimed.

Sofia Leal Amaral also stated to the paper that they live on a reduced income, approximately a third of what Amaral used to receive as a serving police detective.

What she doesn't mention is the huge wealth the couple have amassed, through TV and radio interviews, books, films, TV documentaries and charging for interviews.
Sky news reported that they had been appraoched by Goncalo Amaral's agent, who told them that he was available for interview, but it would cost £80.000, Sky News apparently declined the offer.

Gone now are the scruffy sloppy clothes, which Mrs Amaral once described as "Hugo Boss suits" they are now replaced with expensive designer gear, which can be argued were purchased for him by abducted Madeleine McCann.
The Amarals also drive around in a brand new Jaguar which a top of the range model could cost them anything up to £70.000. Also another show of their wealth is the big birthday party they held to celebrate Goncalo Amaral's 50th birthday, where many euros were spent on foreworks, which literally went up in smoke, which could be argued would have kept a normal Portuguese family for quite a few months!

It has also been alleged that the the house the Amarals live in and all of his personal wealth has been put in the name of his wife, if true, this may of course affect any settlement Kate and Gerry McCann may be awarded in their libel trial against Goncalo Amaral.

*********************
More to Follow
*********************

How Alarmed Should We be At Brenda Ryan's Opening Post On Her New Forum?

2009-10-14T15:48:00.004+01:00

Brenda Ryan opens a new forum, so what? You may ask and normally, this would be my response, but having read her opening post, I must admit to it setting off a cacophony of alarm bells in my head - judge for yourselves.

QUOTE:____________________________________________

"Bren
Post subject: Get yourselfs back to PDL now and end this.
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 4:23 pm

One thing that keeps amazing me with Kate and Gerry is their continuation with the abduction scenario. Well let’s look at the abduction scenario deeply, like many of us have done over the last two and a half years. Your inconsistencies, your discrepancies Kate and Gerry, your abduction theory is therefore probably implaussible. Even Donal MacIntyre says that it had to be done in under 180 -240 seconds. Yes seems a big number doesn’t it, but that is only 4 minutes max.

I tell you what let us all try, lay something on our settees 90cm in length and the weight of a child at that age, then proceed outside. Once we have done that we then have to search another room to make sure the children were not sleeping in there, go to the window, open it up, then go back and pick up the child, climb through the window (remembering not to leave any DNA Trace) and then get to the top of the road for someone to spot us.

To snatch a child off the street yes it is plausible, drive up, get out snatch the child and then drive off. But to do this in an apartment and in the way that they declare is just not plausible, in my honest opinion.

But whether there were jemmied shutters or not, whether they had an accomplice is not relevant, what is relevant is your actions with regards to an abduction possibly by a unknown paedophile.

Do you honestly think he is treating your daughter like a princess? Do you think he is being nice to her? Because what he is doing to her is too intolerable to think about. That poor child is being violated in such ways that even animals do not treat each other like it. Your daughter is being used as an object for someone’s sexual gratification. She is probably traumatised and probably in pain, so how do you think she feels, if the so called abductor is showing pictures of you globetrotting, smiling and laughing? Do you not think he is probably telling her that he loves her now and that you look so happy without her?

So Kate and Gerry, you say she has been abducted, then we will go with that the day you and your friends return to Portugal for a reconstruction, you Kate answer the questions and you both demand to know why the case is shelved in Portugal and demand that it be re-opened. But up until that time we will continue to doubt you, because many of us are parents just like you, and we know damn well that we would never act like you are acting.

All the money in the world will not bring your daughter back. It has been proven with the £2.6 million reward. Nobody came up to claim it, nobody gave you any information in order to claim the reward. And why do you think that is? Because there's probably no information about an abduction to be given. Of course continue in your fruitless search. The search you are doing away from Praia Da Luz, you remember that place don’t you? Well just incase you have forgotten, it is the area where your Detectives say that she could be being held. One more thing, during your recent trip to Portugal Kate who stopped you banging on all the doors in and around Praia Da Luz in hope of finding your daughter? Because I know I would have been banging on doors if detectives had told me she could be within 10 miles of Praia Da Luz.

So instead of threatening to sue us, threatening this that and the other, why not show us that you really are innocent and just do a few simple things. After all, if you are innocent, would it not be best to clear your names once and for all and then your doubters might even start thinking that she could have been abducted. Then the search can commence. But until you go back to Praia Da Luz, knock on the door of Portimao Police Station and answer the questions, do the reconstruction, get rid of your libel lawyers and henchmen, there will be people like myself that do not believe a word that comes out of your mouths.

You both failed miserably that night as parents, by leaving her alone with her younger brother and sister, now is the time to make amends and put things right. Don’t do it for your sakes, do it for Madeleine, because she is the victim in all of this, not you. And remember there could have been two more victims in this, if you are to be believed and that is the twins. What stopped an abductor taking them?"

UNQUOTE____________________________________

This post is alarming, it is spiteful, nasty, vile and unpleasant and well, it is also just plain thick and unnecessarily erudite. Much like the poster herself. Ryan's comments are also very revealing!

To be honest I have never paid much attention to the gossip sweeping the net about Brenda Ryan's former occupation, I am not that bothered by people who make a living out of the oldest profession in the world, but then I discover that Ryan's partner has been in trouble for paying underage girls for sex and that taken in context with Ryan's post is alarming to say the very least, and perhaps it is the police that need to look closely at her comments?

Brenda Ryan begins her comments with an opening salvo of being amazed that the McCanns have kept up the "scenario" as Ryan puts it, of course it doesn't seem to have resonated with Ryan that they have kept this up because Madeleine was abducted, and they are never going to rest and never going to give up looking for their daughter until they find her. In fact, the McCanns are actually displaying typical and classical behaviour, Madeleine is their daughter and she was abducted, what would you expect them to do, come home from holiday and just say "oh well, never mind" and just get on with their lives minus their eldest child? No of course not, God forbid this ever happened to any of us, but we would do exactly the same as them and they are doing what they promised to do "leave no stone unturned".

Not good enough for the alleged ex prostitute Brenda Ryan, she now wants us all to look at the abduction scenario "deeply", so deeply, if you cut her own opinions which she shoves down the readers throats, her examination of the "abduction scenario deeply" last for approximately nine lines! Hmm yes. The rest if her comments are her ordering the McCanns about.

She also quotes Donal McIntyre's version of the timelines as if they are gospel, really it would be funny if the overall impression of Ryan's comments were not sick, dark and vile.

Ryan arrogantly orders the McCanns to "get yourselfs back to PDL", who the hell does this woman think she is? Obviously she thinks she knows more the Portuguese judiciary and attorney general. She warbles on about them answering the questions, the fact that they had their Portuguese lawyers present advising them not to answer the questions goes completely over her thick head.
The fact that the questions were never devised to discover where Madeleine may be and who took her, they were specifically devised to try and entrap Kate McCann, also goes completely over her head. However, I don't want to talk about this, it has all been said so many times before and Ryan knows it.

Ryan talks at the reader, shoves her own opinions down the readers throats and displays an alarming level of cruelty mixed with plain ignorance and arrogance, this much is plain, but there is also something far more sinister at work in her comments, something vile, sick and twisted and depraved.

I want to ask what kind of "woman" can write something as sick as the following taken from Ryan's post;

"But whether there were jemmied shutters or not, whether they had an accomplice is not relevant, what is relevant is your actions with regards to an abduction possibly by a unknown paedophile.Do you honestly think he is treating your daughter like a princess?

Do you think he is being nice to her? Because what he is doing to her is too intolerable to think about. That poor child is being violated in such ways that even animals do not treat each other like it. Your daughter is being used as an object for someone’s sexual gratification. She is probably traumatised and probably in pain, so how do you think she feels, if the so called abductor is showing pictures of you globetrotting, smiling and laughing? Do you not think he is probably telling her that he loves her now and that you look so happy without her?"

What kind of woman can even think about writing something so vicious, vile and sick as the above? She has addressed this to two people whose daughter has been abducted and she is taunting them with what could be happening to their child, only Ryan writes it like it is actually happening! Read it and ask yourself what kind of woman would write something like this? A paedophile perhaps?

Ryan goes on about the McCanns going to PDL and answering the questions and jumping through various hoops etc and then and only then can we begin looking for this child, so by Brenda Ryan's own sick and twisted admissions, Madeleine is suffering but she can just go on suffering until her parents have been vilified some more, this time in Portugal. Because what matters more to Brenda Ryan is hurting Kate and Gerry McCann as much as is possible.

Brenda Ryan is not only coming across as a sick and twisted female paedophile she is coming across as a psychopathic sick and twisted female paedophile. It is a also alarming because of the trouble her husband was in and why? Could this be connected and behind why Ryan would write such comments?

Who would have thought Vanessa George, Angela Allen and Colin Blanchard, would set up such a vile exchange of vile material between them on the internet? They too discussed ways that a child could be snatched from the street, just as Brenda Ryan did in her post.

Brenda Ryan's sick, vile and twisted comments are in my opinion made by a paedophile, who wrote them? Her or her partner?

Brenda Ryan's comments have echoes of the paedophile ring of George, Allen and Blanchard and quite honestly, how do we know this is not what the woman is really up to? What she wrote is sick and twisted beyond belief, how could Ryan think it, let alone write it?

And Ryan has tried hard to make everyone think that Madeleine was NOT abducted, so how does she explain seemingly to know what Madeleine 'IS' being used for? This points to abduction, so why is she contradicting herself?

Perhaps the police should call on and question Brenda Ryan and her partner.

I honestly could not believe what I was reading when I first read this and Brenda Ryan, need have no fear, her little offering has got the attention that Ryan craves, it is now lodged with those who know how to deal with it. I am also sure Carter-Ruck was very interested to read Ryan's libellous and defamatory content and I for one think that Brenda Ryan has gone way too far with this post.

This post is Ryans "Rothley leaflets".

The Convicted Criminal Who Thinks He Is Law Unto Himself!

2009-10-07T17:37:00.010+01:00

OH NO YOU CAN'T !

Remember
.
Mr 'Convicted Criminal' Liar/Perjurer

We Are Watching You!

Apologies

We will have to wait a while longer before we publish!

*********************

More To Follow

**********************

Just A Little Reminder To The Rotund Errant Portuguese Cop

2009-10-05T18:36:00.003+01:00

If You Think You Have Got Away With It - Think Again!

We know where you were and what you have been doing and BEHAVE YOURSELF because

'Someone Is watching You'!

Why Don't You Ever Listen Tony?

2009-09-23T00:25:00.003+01:00

Tony & Debbie Discuss Carter-Ruck

Click To Enlarge

Ooops Bennett's Done It Again!

2009-09-18T22:08:00.002+01:00

Tony Lands Stalker Debbie Butler In It Again!

(Click To Enlarge)

Especially For Tony Bennett AKA Wiggly Woo

2009-09-18T00:13:00.002+01:00

As Tony Bennett seems to be having such a tough time, we dedicate this little (very catchy) number to him.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cbeebies/tweenies/songtime/songs/w/wiggly.shtml

There's a worm at the bottom of the garden
And his name is Wiggly Woo
There's a worm at the bottom of the garden
And all that he can do
Is wiggle all night And wiggle all day
Whatever else the people do say
There's a worm at the bottom of the garden
And his name is Wiggly Woo
There's a worm at the bottom of the garden
And his name is Wiggly Woo
There's a worm at the bottom of the garden
And all that he can do
Is wiggle all night
And wiggle all day
Whatever else the people do say
There's a worm at the bottom of the garden
And his name is Wiggly Woo

Tony Bennett's Far Right Links

2009-09-05T16:23:00.005+01:00

The Pinocchios

Revealed: Far right links of Barrymore's bête noire
By Guy Adams
Wednesday, 18 January 2006

http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:37yE0LXiRQ4J:www.independent.co.uk/news/people/pandora/revealed-far-right-links-of-barrymores-becircte-noire-523434.html+Ian+Anderson+National+Front+Anthony+Tony+Bennett&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

* If you thought the plot surrounding the return to public life of Michael Barrymore couldn't possibly get any thicker, think again.
On Monday, Tony Bennett, a lawyer representing the parents of Stuart Lubbock, who died at Barrymore's Essex home in 2001, turned up at the Celebrity Big Brother studios, and attempted to serve legal papers on the troubled entertainer.
Now it emerges that Bennett, who has quickly become Barrymore's bête noire, is himself in possession of a - shall we say? - "colourful" past, on the fringes of right-wing politics.
A few years back, when he was known as plain Anthony Bennett, the retired solicitor made unflattering headlines when was sacked by the UK Independence Party after publishing a pamphlet that described the prophet Mohamed as a paedophile.
He swiftly decamped to Robert Kilroy-Silk's Veritas party, where he briefly became leader. However that also ended in tears, after The Guardian published a front-page exclusive detailing his close links with Ian Anderson, a former chairman of the National Front.
How such a chap ended up taking on Barrymore is anyone's guess. But yesterday, the man himself insisted that politics were irrelevant to the legal proceedings.
"It would be amazing if anyone brought that up," he said. "The Guardian piece was very unfair. The so-called link was tentative. My career shows that I am in no way a racist."

***************************************************************************************
Actually your "career" doesn't show any such thing and I am wondering, what "career" it is that you are referring to?

Or is stalking, intimidation and hounding the innocent and calling for the search for an abducted child to be 'stopped', your chosen "career"?

Why would it be "amazing if anyone brought you relationship to the ex chairman of the National Front up?" I think it would be amazing if people did not mention that you were once affiliated to Ian Anderson of the National Front in some way, people generally tend to raise their eyebrows at such suggestions.

But "SUGGESTIONS" are something you know all about are they not Mr Bennett?

Tony Bennett Goes On The Attack Again!

2009-09-02T17:27:00.002+01:00

Below is my response to an article that Tony Bennett has placed on his website attacking a member of the J4 forum. I am not holding my breath that he will publish it, so I will do it myself.

It appears that Mr Bennett, is only big and brave when he attacks others, who he thinks are vulnerable and cannot fight back, such as Mr Mrs McCann, the parents of abducted Madeleine McCann.

Obviously, when Bennett gets it back he just cannot take it and veers around shooting at anything and everyone, who he thinks disagrees with him.

What Bennett fails to understand (perhaps one of his friends should actually tell him), is that everything that is being done to him, is being done legally and using the laws of the United Kingdom. (Unlike writing libellous books and dropping libellous leaflets into people's letter boxes in a furtherence of a "Hate Campaign")

No Responses to “The Hate Campaign Against The
Madeleine Foundation”

Rosie Says:

Your comment is awaiting moderation. September
2nd, 2009 at 4:01 pm

Have you ever stopped to wonder Mr Bennett, why it
is that you seem to bring out such a strong reaction in people?

For almost 19 months you have swanned around the
internet, making unfounded accusations and repeating idle gossip about the
McCanns.
Mr Mrs McCann are innocent. I do not just say that, this is in
*actual fact* what the law says.
The law in Portugal decrees them innocent,
the Portuguese attorney general has found there is nothing and a complete lack
of evidence to say that any crime was ever committed by Mr Mrs
McCann

Quote:_________________________________________________
“Fernando
Jose Pinto Monteiro, Portugal’s Attorney-General, told police to halt the
investigation into of Madeleine’s disappearance.
A statement released by his
office confirmed that it had decided to
“close the file on the investigation
concerning the disappearance of the minor Madeleine McCann due to lack of
evidence that any crime was committed by the persons placed under formal
investigation”.
UNQUOTE:____________________________________________________

This was also the findings of two of Portugal’s
prosecutors.
Further, the Portuguese attorney general, has stated that the
McCanns will NOT be charged with neglect, because they could NOT be expected to
know that when they left their children for that short time, in a holiday
resort, that one of them would disappear.

You also said the the Portuguese attorney general
said there was proof that Madeleine was dead. NO HE DID NOT!

This Mr Bennett is a complete fabrication, the AG
said no such thing, he said that there was no evidence to show that Madeleine
was dead OR alive. So once again you are found out in a lie.
You decided to
try and bring an action to sue the McCanns for neglect in the British courts,
which was unsuccessful. (Laughed out)You wrote a book which is proof in itself
about how poorly researched and puerile your accusations are and how actually
none of them are in ‘fact’ substantiated, this is the only ‘fact’ that can lay
claim to be a ‘fact’ about you and your works.You started this campaign up about
a child you know nothing about.You started your campaign and have prejudged
Madeleine’s parents, without ever having met them or spoken to them.You based
your book on uncorroborated findings of dogs alerting to something that no one
can prove exactly what they are alerting to.You also based your book on the
bizarre claims of a disgraced former policeman, who himself has been convicted
of lying and perjury.The said policeman has made claims that are unfounded and
unsubstantiated and the book and the ex policeman himself, are sub judice and he
is due in court to face claims of defamation and impeding the search for a
minor.

There have been a great many things that you have
instigated and have claimed about the McCanns and you are not averse to a bit of
triumphalism yourself, as you are currently touring the internet, gloating that
it is 20 days (yesterday) and still you have not heard anything from the police
about your leaflet drop.
This you appear to think, makes you right to have
carried out such a premeditated event.You have also inferred that because the
McCanns are silent, this is taken by you as their admission of guilt.You think
it is OK for you to have produced your booklet because you first offered it up
for consultation of the McCanns lawyers and offered to remove anything they
could *prove* was unfounded.You as an ex solicitor (albeit a disgraced ex
solicitor, fined by the Law Society for bringing the legal profession into
disrepute) ought to know, that innocence cannot be proved and the onus is
directly upon you to *prove* anything you write as being the truth.

Therefor by offering up your spurious booklet actually
does *NOT* exonerate you from blame, or indeed from facing charges of
defamation, libel and slander.But as a solicitor (no matter how briefly) you
should know this, if you do not, there is a caveat in law, a point of law
“Ignorance is NO Defence”.

You and Butler have written various letters to
people attacking the McCanns. One such letter written by Butler to the General
Medical Council asking for them to consider removing the McCanns from the
medical register, on the back of something the foolish woman read in a red top
Sunday newspaper! She quoted that newspaper as ‘The People’, she MISQUOTED it
was actually in another paper.

You and Butler through this website that you have
set up in the name of a child you have never met, have orchestrated a ‘Hate
Campaign’, which you have pursued electronically and in real life.

There have been leaflet distributions in
Northampton, Oxford etc.

On Friday 14th August 2009. Debbie Butler;
Grenville Green and Helene Davies-Green, took your scurrilous campaign right
into the heart of the McCanns home village and directly into the street where
the McCanns have their home with their little 4 year old twins.

You pushed your vile leaflets through the letter boxes
of all the McCanns neighbours, in the attempt to make the McCanns lives as
unpleasant and as unbearable as possible.
And lets us remind you here Mr
Bennett, you did this to two totally innocent people, who have never been
charged with any wrongdoing in their lives (unlike you Bennett who have been
arrested and charged with theft).
Not only did Butler and the greens do this
to the McCanns, they did not care a damn that it would ultimately affect the
lives of the twins. No thought went to if we upset the parents then we upset the
twins.
In fact forget the people you have accused Mr Bennett, there is
evidence of what you have been doing to the McCanns all over the internet. I
would think that you should concentrate on the trouble that this will bring you
all, rather than start another campaign of hatred up against other people who do
not agree with you and what you are doing and the way you are doing it.
And
is this the first time you have done this?

No

Lee Balkwell…Michael Barrymore….Stuart
Lubbock…..Terry Lubbock….etc etc etc

It appears if there is a high profile band wagon to
jump upon, then you are going to jump on it.
One other thing, the authorities
may take the opinion that as you yourself have made yourself high profile and
involved yourself *UNINVITED* and have take it upon yourself, to make
contentious claims, unproven accusations, engaged yourself in writing and
publishing unproven allegations, written books, leaflets and letters about
something you obviously know nothing about. Touted yourselves about for TV,
Radio and press interviews to spread you unfounded accusations, that youmay just
have brought all of this down upon yourself!

Remember it was you that started all of this, no
one asked you to do what you did, you have been behaving like an internet
thug.

Grow Up Mr Bennett and stop behaving like an out of
control bully, whining, crying and complaining, when you get some of your own
medicine back again. If we started to compile everything you have said and
done and produced all the proof of this in screenshots etc, how do you think
that will look to a judge?

Again you veered out of control and shot from the
hip, without thinking and again you are going to bring utter contempt down on
your Foundation. Just like you did by falsely accusing a journalist and two of
his colleagues of sending some email, the same one you accused Mr Nessling of
sending. (again wrongly accusing, this is libellous and slander) You were
responsible through this Foundation of forcing a journalist to close his website
down and then tried to play ignorant. Again Mr Bennett, I remind you, in law,
“Ignorance is NO defence”

Last week alone you managed to ostracise 3
journalists and a national Sunday newspaper.

This week you have named the parliamentary Under
Secretary for State Alan Campbell and Iswich MP Chris Mole on your Foundation
website as somehow being complicit in some hate campaign against this
foundation.

This is in edition to writing what can only be
termed as the “longest suicide not in history” to the prime minister Gordon
Brown, accusing him and his government of all sorts.

These are some pretty powerful enemies you are
making for yourself Mr Bennett, I do hope that every little thing in your life
and the lives of your cohorts is in order!

You are way out of control you silly, pathetic,
foolish little man.

You make Pol Pot look like everyone’s perfect next
door neighbour!

The McCanns Stalkers- Tony Bennett and Debbie Butler

2009-08-31T14:52:00.003+01:00

The McCanns Stalkers

Click On Image To Enlarge

ONLY GAY BULL IN THE VILLAGE!

2009-08-29T17:57:00.003+01:00

THE McCANNS STALKERS AT OXFORD UNIVERSITY!

2009-08-29T15:57:00.002+01:00

Click To Enlarge

DEBBIE BUTLER: McCANNS STALKER

2009-08-17T01:02:00.005+01:00

DON'T FORGET TONY BENNETT, HE TOO IS A McCANN STALKER AND MADELEINE PREDATOR

Care to elucidate Tony Bennett, that you are accused of running a PRO-McCann website and soliciting funds, while at the same time running a negative campaign about them? Do you know anything about this at all?

We warned you this would happen you foolish woman. Personally, I think Social Services should be contacted about you, and you should be investigated for KNOWINGLY doing this to your young son. Maybe he should be taken into care? Harsh words? Yes they are, but I have borrowed them from Debbie Butler and Tony Bennett themselves, this is their mantra, this is what they keep saying about the McCanns. This is what they want to happen to two innocent little children.
Perhaps Debbie Butler should be prosecuted for neglecting her own son Tony Bennett? Who exactly looks after Debbie's little boy while she is constantly out driving Bennett around at the crack of dawn, and giving radio and TV interviews? That is when she is not out late at night sticking those vile *HATE* leaflets through the residents doors in Rothley!

You see Butler you cannot have it both ways, you have accused the McCanns and wished them in hell for actually doing LESS than you are doing. Were you not one of the 3 arguidos posters as *DORIS*, that posted about how the McCanns always left their children in a creche' while on holiday? Who exactly minds your child while you are off all over the country, posting leaflets that no body wants? Oxford, Nottingham, Rothley? Where next? Oh I am so waiting for mine, let one of you people dare to put your trash through my front door, you will get a whole lot more than you bargained for!

What are your plans now? To go putting your stinking vile lies through the doors of the Tapas 7 and their families, friends and neighbours?

What vile nasty creatures you are.

However, just as I have successfully predicted your fates, I make another prediction, you will be arrested and charged before the week is out, and that means you too Bennett! Just because you have fronted Debbie, so she can take all the blame for what you have organised, doesn't mean you have escaped the notice of the police!

Oh and aren't the papers going to have fun, investigating Grenville Green of justice for carers and his wife?

In case anyone is in any doubt Grenville Green is the biker who had his photo taken next to Madeleine's candle in Rothley, treating the little girls monument like a tourist attraction and that was AFTER defiling it with Bennett's vile lying and ever decreasing Reasons, why Bennett and Butler think it is OK to stalk, hound and terrorise the parents of a missing child.

Grenville posing by Madeleine's candle after defiling her monument with Bennett's vile lies!

It has to end now and the police have to get involved, pity they didn't before, not as if they have not been notified about what this cretinous crew have been doing.

One last thing Debbie Butler told the Express reporter that "they were trying to help the McCanns" well I'll leave you with this, how can anyone tell such bare faced lies about helping the McCanns, when they write letters like this below.

Tell us Debbie Butler Aka Doris from the 3 arguidos and Madeleine Foundation, how on earth is telling lies, making libellous comments and trying to get these doctors struck off the medical register, by writing this despicable letter about them to the General Medical Council, helping them exactly? You are wrong in everything you write, you cannot even quote the correct newspaper, you complete moron!

Monday 13 July 2009
Chairman,
Fitness to Practise Committee,
General Medical Council,
St. James’s Buildings
79 Oxford Street
MANCHESTER
M1 6FQ.

re: Fitness to Practise: Dr Gerald McCann and Dr Kate McCann (formerly Dr Kate Healy)

I write to bring to your attention a report about the above couple, both doctors, published in the Sunday People yesterday.Dr Gerald McCann and Dr Kate McCann are the parents of Madeleine McCann, who was reported missing by her mother at around 10.00pm on Thursday 3 May 2007. The circumstances of her disappearance remain mysterious and as yet unsolved. They were made official suspects of involvement in their daughter’s disappearance in September 2007, a status that lasted until July 2008 when the Portuguese judicial authorities concluded that at that time there was insufficient evidence to charge them or anyone else with a crime against Madeleine.Yesterday, the Sunday People published an article based on what they said was a 34-page libel writ served in Portugal against Goncalo Amaral. The McCanns and their advisers have already announced in the press that they intended to sue Mr Amaral for libel. Mr Amaral was the senior investigating officer in the case until he was removed from the investigation in controversial circumstances in October 2007. A month earlier, he was the man responsible for declaring the McCanns to be official suspects in their daughter’s disappearance.The Sunday People says it has translated the libel writ from the Portuguese. The McCanns are claiming damages of £1 million from Mr Amaral. I wish to bring to your attention the medical and psychological condition of these two doctors, one of whom continues to practise, and both of whom we understand to be on the GMC Register.The writ says of Dr Kate McCann that she is ‘deeply and seriously depressed”. The writ goes on to describe both of the McCanns as suffering from:
permanent anxiety
insomnia
lack of appetite
irritability indefinable fear In the writ, according to the Sunday People, the McCanns further describe both of themselves as:
“totally destroyed”
“irreparably damaged”, and “totally destroyed from a moral, social, ethical, emotional and family point of view”The question that arises is whether either of these doctors is fit to practise or indeed to remain on the GMC Register, at least until these serious psychological problems, suggestive of mental illness, subside. We suggest that the appropriate committee of the GMC should consider (a) suspending them from the GMC until a psychiatrist deems that they have recovered from the above symptoms and (b) providing them with the expert psychiatric help and counselling that anyone exhibiting such severe symptoms should receive from the N.H.S. Presumably if the McCanns are exhibiting these symptoms there are reports available from their G.P. or a psychiatric specialist confirming those symptoms.The other possibility of course, is that the McCanns are grossly exaggerating the extent of their depression or even lying about it, in order to make as much money as possible from Mr Amaral. If that were the case, there would definitely be a whole series of other questions about their fitness to remain in practice and remain on the GMC Register. Many videos and still images exist of the McCanns laughing and joking and appearing to be anything but severely depressed. That would suggest at least the possibility that they have deliberately exaggerated their sadness at and reaction to the loss of Madeleine in order to make as much money as possible from their proposed libel action.Finally, I would like to take this opportunity to enclose a complimentary copy of a book written by Tony Bennett, titled: “What Really Happened to Madeleine McCann? - 60 reasons which suggest she was not abducted”. The book suggests that the McCanns’ claim that Madeleine was abducted runs counter to a mass of evidence. Its conclusion is precisely the same as that of Mr Amaral, whose book: ‘A XXXXXX XX XXXXXX’, (“The Truth About A Lie”), explains that the evidence suggests that Madeleine McCann died in her parents’ apartment and that her body was subsequently hidden or otherwise disposed of. I should add at this point that a great many British people would categorically refuse to be treated by either of the McCanns because of what they have seen of them on TV, or read about them in newspaper articles, or in Mr Bennett’s booklet. For them, the issue is trust. They do not feel that they can trust the McCanns.It is vital for both the medical profession and for the patient that patients have complete trust that their doctors are trustworthy. A clear example among many of why the McCanns cannot be trusted is that initially they claimed that an abductor had jemmied open the shutters to their apartment to gain entrance. Only when this was exposed as patently untrue did they then change their story, now claiming that the abductor must have entered by an open patio door and escaped with Madeleine out of a small window. These are matters we know have been brought to your attention by many others apart from us. We trust that you will take appropriate action with regard to the McCanns and their fitness to practise, taking account the contents of this letter and all the other evidence about their fitness to practice which is available to you.Finally, I understand that there may be a form on which official complaints should be submitted. If such a form exists, please could you send me two copies of such a form, one for each doctor.

Yours sincerely,

Debbie Butler

Chairman The Madeleine Foundation

Can anyone, by any stretch of the imagination say, that the above letter that Debbie Butler wrote to the GMC, is in any way, shape, or form "helping the McCanns?"
Perhaps liar Butler, can explain just how is hoping to get two doctors struck off the medical register helpful to them?
How would removing the livelihood from Dr Gerald McCann, be in any way helpful to them?
It would almost certainly result in them losing their home and remember, this is not only the McCanns home, it is the home and the *only* home that Madeleine's twin brother and sister know.

All this and more from the intrepid pair, 'Tony Bennett and Debbie Butler', would you want them near your child/children?

Anthony John Stuart Bennett (Tony Bennett) A Madeleine Predator and The Stalker and Hounder of Kate & Gerry McCann Strikes AGAIN!

2009-08-14T15:35:00.009+01:00

Anthony John Stuart Bennett (Tony Bennett) A Madeleine Predator and The Stalker and Hounder of Kate & Gerry McCann Strikes AGAIN!

Pictured Below Is the Liar and Disgraced Former Solicitor Tony Bennett & His Cerebrally Challenged Pensioner Groupie Debbie Butler - These Are The People Responsible For Distributing Their Foul Lies and Unsubstantiated Accusations In Rothley, The McCanns Home!

Just in case there is any confusion Bennett you saddo sick SOB, the BBC news bulletin reports that ;

"RESIDENTS WERE SICKENED TO FIND YOUR PATHETIC LYING LEAFLETS ON THEIR DOOR MATS."

Here is the link to where it made the BBC news.

There is an application to the Treasury department asking for Tony Bennett to be made a vexatious litigant and the appropriate authorities are apparently investigating Bennett.

You may not realise it but anyone can request that Tony Bennett be made vexatious litigant, you do NOT have to pay and you do NOT have to attend court.

I suggest the attorney general's office get's their finger out and shift their backsides and STOP this evil narcissistic man from inflicting any more pain and distress on these parents.

How much more are Kate and Gerry McCann supposed to take from this person before the law of this country gets off of its backside and actually does something?

The McCanns have been subject to threats of violence. Kate has been threatened with abduction and torture to make her "talk".

The twins have had threats of abduction made.

Gerry has been threatened with violence as has Clarence Mitchell and Brian Kennedy and even Brian Kennedy's son.

Also on this forum we have taken screenshots of someone threatening to throw a 'Molotov cocktail' at the McCanns home.

Also The McCanns relatives have been threatened with personal violence.

All these threats have come from a hate form better known as the 3 arguidos.

Tony Bennett posts from the 3 arguidos and his evil Foundation, where he regularly incites others to do his dirty work, where he regularly incites others to hand out his filthy leaflets, he has even tried to get convicted criminals in on the at by bribing them with a mention on his pathetic website.

When is all of this going to stop? When are the authorities in our country going to act to protect Mr Mrs McCann and their family and friends and neighbours?

Before or after a tragedy?

Bennett purposefully travelled to London so he could try and intimidate Gerry McCann, when Gerry appeared at a 'Commons Select Committee' to discuss media coverage of his daughter.

Here is Tony Bennett in plain view, notice he chose to sit directly behind Gerry McCann.

You Can't miss him, he is the ugly looking liar, with two hairs combed over his bald shiny pate' wearing huge milk bottle bottom glasses, sifting through his papers and trying to make himself look important, sitting behind Gerry McCann.

Watch The Video Here

http://orange.kewego.co.uk/video/iLyROoafJ1T7.html

Here Below is a Picture of the Weasel Sitting Behind Gerry McCann and Clarence Mitchell.

Tony Bennett is nothing but a lying despicable toad. He jumps on every high profile bandwagon going to try and bask in what he thinks is the glory of publicity.

Tony Bennett is a Walter Mitty type character, an attention seeking fantasist, however, he is not harmless!

He is hurting real life people, it is NOT funny and it is NOT harmless and Bennett himself is NOT funny or harmless. He is evil and he is dangerous and he must be stopped.

Please don't just tut, shake your head and mutter something under your breath at Bennett, here is YOUR CHANCE to actually do something to have him STOPPED, legally in the name of the UK law!

I urge all those who feel strongly about Bennett to write to their MPs and to the attorney general and Jack Straw the Minister for Justice and DEMAND that something is done about this despicable cretinous creature.

Write to the address on this letter and demand that something is done about this man Tony Bennett!

CLICK TO ENLARGE

PLEASE READ WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO TO HELP MR MRS McCANN

PLEASE HELP FREE THEM FROM PEOPLE LIKE BENNETT, SO THEY CAN CONCENTRATE ON SEARCHING FOR THEIR DAUGHTER!

Please take a Few Minutes and at the cost of a stamp please write to:

(Example Please Feel Free To Use)

Litigation & Employment Group
Treasury Solicitor's Office
One Kemble Street
London
WC2B 4TS

Dear Sir/Madam

Please can you take the time to look at Anthony John Bennett of:

Mr A Bennett
Secretary
The Madeleine Foundation
66 Chippingfield
HARLOW
Essex
CM17 0DJ
Tel: 01279 635789

With a view to making this man a vexatious litigant. He is hounding and stalking the parents of abducted and still missing Madeleine McCann.
He is making and distributing booklets and leaflets which contain unsubstantiated lies and accusations.
He is turning up where Mr and Mrs McCann attend in person, and is also inciting others to do so.

This is not the first time this former solicitor has done this kind of thing, he latches on to people who find themselves suddenly thrust into the media, and often when they are at the lowest ebb in their lives.

He has already been fined by the Law Society for bringing the profession into disrepute.
He has also encouraged the chairman of his foundation to write to the General Medical Council to demand that action be taken against these Doctors McCann, and that they may be removed from the Medical Register, because they may be depressed over their missing daughter!

I trust you will investigate this man thoroughly and take the appropriate action.

Sincerely

(Your Signature)

Just in case you are in doubt if to write or not, here is the letter his sidekick Debbie Butler wrote to the General medical Council about Doctors Kate and Gerry McCann.

******************************************************************************************
Here follows the kind if thing that Tony Bennett encourages, he has also been responsible for writing to Leicestershire social services about the McCanns, and he has also tried to UNSUSUCCESSFULLY bring a ridiculous action against these parents in court!

Monday 13 July 2009
Chairman,
Fitness to Practise Committee,
General Medical Council,
St. James’s Buildings
79 Oxford Street
MANCHESTER
M1 6FQ.

Dear Sir/Madam

re: Fitness to Practise: Dr Gerald McCann and Dr Kate McCann (formerly Dr Kate Healy)I write to bring to your attention a report about the above couple, both doctors, published in the Sunday People yesterday.Dr Gerald McCann and Dr Kate McCann are the parents of Madeleine McCann, who was reported missing by her mother at around 10.00pm on Thursday 3 May 2007. The circumstances of her disappearance remain mysterious and as yet unsolved. They were made official suspects of involvement in their daughter’s disappearance in September 2007, a status that lasted until July 2008 when the Portuguese judicial authorities concluded that at that time there was insufficient evidence to charge them or anyone else with a crime against Madeleine.Yesterday, the Sunday People published an article based on what they said was a 34-page libel writ served in Portugal against Goncalo Amaral. The McCanns and their advisers have already announced in the press that they intended to sue Mr Amaral for libel. Mr Amaral was the senior investigating officer in the case until he was removed from the investigation in controversial circumstances in October 2007. A month earlier, he was the man responsible for declaring the McCanns to be official suspects in their daughter’s disappearance.The Sunday People says it has translated the libel writ from the Portuguese. The McCanns are claiming damages of £1 million from Mr Amaral. I wish to bring to your attention the medical and psychological condition of these two doctors, one of whom continues to practise, and both of whom we understand to be on the GMC Register.The writ says of Dr Kate McCann that she is ‘deeply and seriously depressed”. The writ goes on to describe both of the McCanns as suffering from:

permanent anxiety
insomnia
lack of appetite
irritability indefinable fear In the writ, according to the Sunday People, the McCanns further describe both of themselves as:
“totally destroyed”
“irreparably damaged”, and “totally destroyed from a moral, social, ethical, emotional and family point of view”

The question that arises is whether either of these doctors is fit to practise or indeed to remain on the GMC Register, at least until these serious psychological problems, suggestive of mental illness, subside. We suggest that the appropriate committee of the GMC should consider (a) suspending them from the GMC until a psychiatrist deems that they have recovered from the above symptoms and (b) providing them with the expert psychiatric help and counselling that anyone exhibiting such severe symptoms should receive from the N.H.S. Presumably if the McCanns are exhibiting these symptoms there are reports available from their G.P. or a psychiatric specialist confirming those symptoms.The other possibility of course, is that the McCanns are grossly exaggerating the extent of their depression or even lying about it, in order to make as much money as possible from Mr Amaral. If that were the case, there would definitely be a whole series of other questions about their fitness to remain in practice and remain on the GMC Register. Many videos and still images exist of the McCanns laughing and joking and appearing to be anything but severely depressed. That would suggest at least the possibility that they have deliberately exaggerated their sadness at and reaction to the loss of Madeleine in order to make as much money as possible from their proposed libel action.Finally, I would like to take this opportunity to enclose a complimentary copy of a book written by Tony Bennett, titled: “What Really Happened to Madeleine McCann? - 60 reasons which suggest she was not abducted”. The book suggests that the McCanns’ claim that Madeleine was abducted runs counter to a mass of evidence. Its conclusion is precisely the same as that of Mr Amaral, whose book: ‘A XXXXXX XX XXXXXX’, (“The Truth About A Lie”), explains that the evidence suggests that Madeleine McCann died in her parents’ apartment and that her body was subsequently hidden or otherwise disposed of. I should add at this point that a great many British people would categorically refuse to be treated by either of the McCanns because of what they have seen of them on TV, or read about them in newspaper articles, or in Mr Bennett’s booklet. For them, the issue is trust. They do not feel that they can trust the McCanns.It is vital for both the medical profession and for the patient that patients have complete trust that their doctors are trustworthy. A clear example among many of why the McCanns cannot be trusted is that initially they claimed that an abductor had jemmied open the shutters to their apartment to gain entrance. Only when this was exposed as patently untrue did they then change their story, now claiming that the abductor must have entered by an open patio door and escaped with Madeleine out of a small window. These are matters we know have been brought to your attention by many others apart from us. We trust that you will take appropriate action with regard to the McCanns and their fitness to practise, taking account the contents of this letter and all the other evidence about their fitness to practice which is available to you.

Finally, I understand that there may be a form on which official complaints should be submitted. If such a form exists, please could you send me two copies of such a form, one for each doctor.

Yours sincerely,
Debbie Butler
Chairman The Madeleine Foundation

*******************************************************************************************

They made this complaint and they could not even quote the correct newspaper, they misquoted and quoted the WRONG newspaper.

Needless to say the GMC were quick to reply and more or less told them to go forth and multiply.

But they are not going to d any such thing and this man and his sidekick pensioner Butler, will not stop until they are stopped by law.

Please let us try to make this happen.

This man is doing irreparable harm to the search for an innocent missing little girl who was abducted from her bed in Praia da Luz, Portugal May 3rd 2007.

This man Bennett is now doing colossal harm to the parents of Madeleine, who are already suffering immeasurable pain and distress over their missing daughter.

It is is simple, Bennett MUST be STOPPED!

There is simply not enough space to include all the despicable things that Bennett has done to Mr Mrs McCann.

It has also been rumoured that Bennett has links to the BNP and has certainly been published on unsavory sites like this

http://seanbryson.com/articles/robin_page.html

(Beware this site of white supremacy is NOT for the faint hearted!)

MORE MADELEINE PREDATORS

Liar and fantasist Duarte Levy, when asked to provide the proof of photographs he said he had, he failed and he failed because they do not exist.
Another Convicted liar who is being allowed to make millions out of his failure to even conduct the basic of police procedures when Madeleine first disappeared who has written books and cashed in on just about every place and everywhere he could and is still making money out of Madeleine is Goncalo Amaral. former police chief, disgraced and sacked form his job, since found guilty of lying under oath and received a suspended prison sentence. Since charged with the torture of another witness, if found guilty will definitely go to prison!

Goncalo Amaral, is the disgrace former Portuguese detective who wrote the book of lies and who Tony Bennett based his lying pamphlets and leaflets on.

Madeleine McCann - New Information Appeal over "Australian" Woman

2009-08-14T15:11:00.003+01:00

UPDATE:

Madeleine McCann - New Information Appeal over "Australian" Woman

A witness has come forward to give the investigators currently searching for Madeleine McCann new information about a suspicious incident that took place in Barcelona in the early hours of May 7th 2007 - just over 72 hours after Madeleine was abducted whilst on holiday in Praia da Luz in Portugal.

The 41-year-old British witness was attending a party with a group of other men in the area of the Port Olimpic Marina in Barcelona. It is a busy location that is popular with both tourists and local people. The group had been visiting a number of bars and restaurants in the marina area on the evening of the May 6th 2007 and into the early hours of May 7th 2007.

At around 2.00am on May 7th, the witness became aware of a well-dressed woman, who he describes as appearing agitated. She was seen in the area of the El Rey De La Gamba restaurant-bar for some ten minutes, walking up and down.

The witness got up and walked towards the woman and had a short conversation with her. This conversation was potentially significant to the investigation. However, for strict operational reasons, the investigators will not be divulging any details of what was said to the witness.

It is as a result of this conversation that the investigators now want to trace the woman, who they believe to be possibly Australian.
mf...
Following the conversation the woman sat down in another nearby bar. A further person from the same party group also saw her there. At this bar the woman had a heated discussion with someone in what seemed to be fluent Spanish.
The woman was last seen walking away in the direction of a local hospital and the more distant ferry and cruise ship terminals.
The woman is described by the principal witness as follows:
White
Aged 30 to 35 years
Slim build
Short brown hair
Approximately 5"2 tall
Wearing expensive looking blue jeans and a jersey top, possibly pastel colour
Her build equated to a size 10 dress size.
The witness described her as "a bit of a Victoria Beckham look-a-like". She spoke English with what the witness has described as "possibly an Australian" accent. The investigators now hope the international media, in particular Australian and Spanish broadcasters, will help to distribute the attached e-fit of the woman, which has been prepared by a police artist, as widely as possible.
The British witness does not wish to be identified publicly. The investigators have already conducted some preliminary inquiries in the vicinity of the Port Olimpic Marina and are continuing to liaise with relevant police forces where necessary.
Anyone who may know the woman should contact the

Madeleine McCann investigation team on +44 845 838 4699

or via the Madeleine McCann investigation email address:

investigation@findmadeleine.com.

Tiny Bonnett Interviews For the Foundation

2009-08-13T10:38:00.001+01:00

Duarte Levy Discovered In a Chip Shop In Scunthorpe

2009-08-05T14:31:00.003+01:00

In His New Role As An Elvis Impersonator!

2009-08-02T18:10:00.004+01:00

3 Arguidos Is Going Down

Oh Dear Someone Else Thinks Bennett Is The Solicitor Fro Hell Too

2009-07-28T16:07:00.003+01:00

Good Old "Comb Over" Tony Bennett

Has Got Himself Entered Here

There you go you old attention seeker Tone

(Don't say we never give you anything!)